Moby
Dick
Did he say anything about Roe v Wade during his campaign? Can't remember myself.Doesn't mess with Roe v Wade
Did he say anything about Roe v Wade during his campaign? Can't remember myself.Doesn't mess with Roe v Wade
Wasn't a big thing...but, he harped on about appointing 'Pro Life' and 'strict constructionists' Judges to the Supreme Court. Judges he thought would overturn Roe V Wade - if for no other reason, that States Rights.Did he say anything about Roe v Wade during his campaign? Can't remember myself.
My Trump theory is far more recent than the 80s.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/21/politics/donald-trump-election-democrat/
I'm more troubled by your theory than any other. Every single thing you predicted has failed spectacularly so far. Many of us had got it wrong with Trump though, but you were some sort of an expert on US elections
One guy on TYT predicted Trump wont kick out as many illegals as Obama.I'll kick out 12mil illegals...he kicks out a mil.
Well, it's still a million...illegal president Obongo wasn't doing shit.
Obama was kicking out pretty big numbers to be fair. I'm more interested to see what Trump does with the DREAMERSOne guy on TYT predicted Trump wont kick out as many illegals as Obama.
I'm more troubled by your theory than any other. Every single thing you predicted has failed spectacularly so far. Many of us had got it wrong with Trump though, but you were some sort of an expert on US elections
I remember suggesting a few weeks ago that the models might not be such great shakes when it comes to predicting elections, you gave that view short shrift at the time.What theory are you talking about ? My views on a Hillary win were completely in line with most probabilistic models, which i was using to form my view.
In what way?Tbh,the whole concept of illegal immigrants and the attitude of US citizens to it has been very surprising to myself.
I'm more troubled by your theory than any other. Every single thing you predicted has failed spectacularly so far. Many of us had got it wrong with Trump though, but you were some sort of an expert on US elections
What theory are you talking about ? .
I bet he means your theory about the new Doofus elect not do anything he has said he will and will probably be quite Liberal and certainly not as bad as everyone thinks or is making out.
On a scale of 1-10, how chuffed were you when you thought of that?
I laughed and I am ashamed.
"I hear you're a racist now, Father."
I remember suggesting a few weeks ago that the models might not be such great shakes when it comes to predicting elections, you gave that view short shrift at the time.
Yeah. Will be interesting to see how they do in forthcoming elections.Turns out you were right. The problem with most of the models is they do fine when you have two conventional candidates squaring off, but they go a bit haywire when you have an asymmetrical populist like Trump in the mix. The 2nd half of why they go wrong is they are unable to factor in things like early voting results and shy or silent voters. If people don't answer polls honestly, then the polls and by extension the probabilistic models as a whole, are likely to be wrong.
I stand by that bit. You don't go through most of your professional life with one view and then flip on a dime when you turn 70.
But that's the problem, isn't it? He's never really had one view...he's constantly and consistently changed them on a whim. If he was really a closet liberal who'd played us all for a fool...then why the hell is he appointing extremely conservative cabinet members? At what point does he change into this supposed liberal?
Well he never seemed much of a liberal on ISIS. He's going to go after them hard,
Boots on the ground, carpet bombing?
I'm more troubled by your theory than any other. Every single thing you predicted has failed spectacularly so far. Many of us had got it wrong with Trump though, but you were some sort of an expert on US elections
It's Glazers all over again.That family will rob America blind.
It does but we're being mean to Raoul, not the polls he mistakenly championed.It seems that late deciders made up a higher proportion of voters than usual and opted for Trump in large numbers. It's hard for polls to catch that. Even Trump's own people didn't think he was going to win.
In what way?
I think they just assumed that you had your finger on the pulse of American opinion, you're right that they're gullible if that's the only avenue if news they had but it's evident that opposing views from the predominant narrative were shot down quite quickly in the election thread, it's why I kept my pessimistic mouth shout for the duration of the campaign.I'm actually more troubled for the gullible sheep who rather than doing their own research, came to a football forum to read my views on the US presidential elections for comfort or reassurance as to who might win.
It's Glazers all over again.
I think they just assumed that you had your finger on the pulse of American opinion, you're right that they're gullible if that's the only avenue if news they had but it's evident that opposing views from the predominant narrative were shot down quite quickly in the election thread, it's why I kept my pessimistic mouth shout for the duration of the campaign.