Sweet Square
ˈkämyənəst
Maddow/Taxes = Sneijder, Ozil, Benzema, Hazard etc.
Was thinking this as well.
Maddow/Taxes = Sneijder, Ozil, Benzema, Hazard etc.
Yes, which means it's not likely to be about her ethics or wherewithal but electoral chances. Seeing that R incumbents on Clinton districts are few and far in between, it doesn't affect Ryan's ability to whip enough votes for major legislations (he can afford to lose about 20, taking absentations and vacancies into account)
Just did a huge plug!By the sounds of it they're not making a big deal out of it on air so far, which you'd think they would if this was in any way explosive.
Obviously they read the CE.Just did a huge plug!
well she did in depth reports on Trump links to Russia Tycoon and Tampa Bay property so she knows the subject better than most.
The bill is dead on arrival. It may not even make it out of committee.
TMIJust did a huge plug!
Obamacare in particular inflames the crazies, but they will be more amenable to tax cuts, military spending, the whole Randian shebangs. His agenda will be advanced or stopped by the Freedom Caucus with their 40 votes, not the odd weak incumbents like the one in your tweet.
The Russia connection allegedly goes as far back as his Casino business where he may have helped them launder money.Bit too early for Russian juice you suspect.
Does this, if true, make Maddow's scoop important or unimportant?
Confirmed by herself
Its a combination of both the freedom caucus and the moderates. Together they will sandwhich Trump and Ryan's healthcare strategy into an untenable position that can't advance past the house or senate. If they capitulate to the freedom caucus demands, they will lose Trump (pre-existing conditions, medicare etc), and if they go too far to the center, they will lose both the freedom caucus and many other GOPers who don't want to commit political suicide in the lead up to a mid term year. In either case, they won't succeed in moving ahead.
She's cooling it a little. Probably realised how damaging a damp squib could be to her. I'm guess they've got something though otherwise it wouldn't be worth reporting.
"We have his tax returns!"
"Nothing really to say about them"
Still it's quite encouraging that they can get access to some of it. More could follow.
The thread title needs changing.
'Presidency', needs to be swapped for 'dictatorship' or any of the other similar synonyms.
Coz it's not acting like anything based on any constitutional law, but more like a fascist or (ironically) communist state.
Ultimate question is: Do all these matter? To Trump they don't really matter. He gets away with everything. Things that bother him, he swats it away or rants on Twitter. Whatever.BTW, this could wind up being an even bigger shit week for Trump than previously thought. Botched healthcare roll out, Comey goes public, and someone publishes part of his taxes.
Your not kidding. They won't be investigating him on a whim so the very fact an investigation like this is warranted would be huge for a President.
Drumpf attempting to beat Maddow to the punch, preemptively releasing a statement on his taxes.
That's an official white house statement?