The Trump Presidency | Biden Inaugurated

Status
Not open for further replies.
Oooops. No to mention quite a few US citizens here who are not pro Trump
Fair point. But 49 % is still a high number of voters. Also there is a reason why they have electoral colleges in the US. I don't have time to explain it right now but in short it's so that the vote is more even
 
Ok an uninformed president. Not good, someone should inform him
says whatever comes to his head. many do and have done in the past (i'm sure I could dig up a few things if I had to)
could cause an international incident (true but that never stopped Obama from bombing everyone so they point is not even moot), plus no international incident as of yet.
Can't comment on number 4 as I've not been following

Cypriot haircut of deposits may be irrelevant but tell that to depositors who lost their money overnight because a president lied to them. It's far worse than this Sweden incident which has been blown way out of proportion.

There I've addressed your point. That's my opinion.

And there's your problem. Thanks for playing.
 
Because the same can be said of Russia, and USA's (backed by the EU) military and economy is far more equipped for the other forms of direct conflict.

Except this is right on Russia's doorstep, as close to them as Cuba is to the US. Which is another reason why its a tough one to justify for America politically.
 
And there's your problem. Thanks for playing.
Knew that was coming. That's a cheap shot. Of all the things I said you only read that which is relevant to your agenda while failing to address my points. But thanks you can go to bed and sleep happily now.
 
Yeah bro, first country to recognise them as an independent state and the first to sign a bilateral treaty. To be fair, France wasn't too far behind.

I'm fairly sure that I was supposed to learn that at some point.:lol:
 
Fair point. But 49 % is still a high number of voters. Also there is a reason why they have electoral colleges in the US. I don't have time to explain it right now but in short it's so that the vote is more even

Too bad Trump only got46% of the vote. And you are wrong about why the electoral college exists it is not to make the vote more even. It does not have anything at all to do with making the vote even. For all intents and purposes all 100% of the electoral votes could be won by one candidate and it would have worked as intended.

I'd say nice wumming but I suspect you actually believe the stupid things you are typing.
 
Last edited:
People need to ease up on Trump - he has 'given the information' or 'heard' it - he isn't responsible for what he says.

sheesh...some people!
 
Fair point. But 49 % is still a high number of voters. Also there is a reason why they have electoral colleges in the US. I don't have time to explain it right now but in short it's so that the vote is more even

The reason being to prevent a dangerous, populist, demagogue from taking power. That went well.
 
Too bad Trump only got46% of the vote. And you are wrong about why the electoral college exists it is not to make the vote more even. It does not have anything at all to do with making the vote even. For all intents and pimposed all 100% of the electoral votes could be won by one candidate and it would have worked as intended.

I'd say nice wumming but I suspect you actually believe the stupid things you are typing.
So hold on are you saying that the electoral colleges should not be used anymore?
 
Lol talk about a reading comprehension failure.
OMG you are so ignorant. DO you realise that your posts make no sense? Sorry, no of course you don't. Now if you have time to talk about what electoral colleges are there for, then knock yourself out

I'm also convinced that you're just trolling now. Like your Mar a lago comment
 
Knew that was coming. That's a cheap shot. Of all the things I said you only read that which is relevant to your agenda while failing to address my points. But thanks you can go to bed and sleep happily now.

You're the one who chose not to address what I said was the most important point because you're not informed. You cheap shotted yourself.
 
OMG you are so ignorant. DO you realise that your posts make no sense? Sorry, no of course you don't. Now if you have time to talk about what electoral colleges are there for, then knock yourself out

I'm also convinced that you're just trolling now. Like your Mar a lago comment
No it made sense to any who know what the electoral college is for and it is not to even out the vote.
 
OMG you are so ignorant. DO you realise that your posts make no sense? Sorry, no of course you don't. Now if you have time to talk about what electoral colleges are there for, then knock yourself out

I'm also convinced that you're just trolling now. Like your Mar a lago comment

I spoke about mar a Lago, and you're convinced wrongly of that merely because you're uninformed.
 
You're the one who chose not to address what I said was the most important point because you're not informed. You cheap shotted yourself.
Sorry but I can't address a point which I don't know about.

Plus, if I don't address it, you'll say that I didn't address your point. So I addressed it with the truth. No harm in that.
 
How on earth is the next step nukes? MAD means nukes aren't even worth discussing, the absolute worst case scenario would have been exactly the same fighting we saw anyway except that the Ukrainians would have been supplemented by US troops/equipment and therefore many more times formidable. With Russia already suffering economically and the EU likely to increase sanctions on them they couldn't have sustained their push for long, Putin wouldn't have bothered attempting it in the first place.

But he saw into Obama's mind and saw that all there would be was temporary economic sanction, a price worth paying. Would he have seen the same in Trump's?

Sounds like you're inventing scenarios to support your original position. The US isn't interested in any kind of hot war with the Russians and vice versa - for obvious reasons. Once you start one, there's too much risk of things escalating to nukes as both sides attempt to gain supremacy. You can't therefore decouple the plausibility of nukes coming into the equation if a military conflict were to take place. Economic sanctions were therefore the only realistic reaction to Putin's actions. By the way, the steps Obama took were only initial ones. He could've pressed for Russia to be removed from the SWIFT banking system, which would've been devastating to the Russian economy.
 
Too bad Trump only got46% of the vote. And you are wrong about why the electoral college exists it is not to make the vote more even. It does not have anything at all to do with making the vote even. For all intents and purposes all 100% of the electoral votes could be won by one candidate and it would have worked as intended.

I'd say nice wumming but I suspect you actually believe the stupid things you are typing.

On the top of my head, isn't it to give more say to rural America?
 
These guys have heads made of concrete, they never take anything in. Never soften their argument due to the facts they encounter... Always double down, embarrass themselves, and end up discredited and ignored. Pointless...
 
Too bad Trump only got46% of the vote. And you are wrong about why the electoral college exists it is not to make the vote more even. It does not have anything at all to do with making the vote even. For all intents and purposes all 100% of the electoral votes could be won by one candidate and it would have worked as intended.

I'd say nice wumming but I suspect you actually believe the stupid things you are typing.
"I don't have time to explain it right now" :lol:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.