RedTiger
Half mast
Morroco and France.Isn't it supposed to be France with the support during the revolution and Lafayette? I also don't think that both countries have ever been on different sides.
Morroco and France.Isn't it supposed to be France with the support during the revolution and Lafayette? I also don't think that both countries have ever been on different sides.
Fair point. But 49 % is still a high number of voters. Also there is a reason why they have electoral colleges in the US. I don't have time to explain it right now but in short it's so that the vote is more evenOooops. No to mention quite a few US citizens here who are not pro Trump
You realise that more US citizens voted for his opponent, right?
Ok an uninformed president. Not good, someone should inform him
says whatever comes to his head. many do and have done in the past (i'm sure I could dig up a few things if I had to)
could cause an international incident (true but that never stopped Obama from bombing everyone so they point is not even moot), plus no international incident as of yet.
Can't comment on number 4 as I've not been following
Cypriot haircut of deposits may be irrelevant but tell that to depositors who lost their money overnight because a president lied to them. It's far worse than this Sweden incident which has been blown way out of proportion.
There I've addressed your point. That's my opinion.
Morroco and France.
Because the same can be said of Russia, and USA's (backed by the EU) military and economy is far more equipped for the other forms of direct conflict.
Yeah bro, first country to recognise them as an independent state and the first to sign a bilateral treaty. To be fair, France wasn't too far behind.I didn't know about Morocco.
Did Trump invent some attack in Sweden?
Knew that was coming. That's a cheap shot. Of all the things I said you only read that which is relevant to your agenda while failing to address my points. But thanks you can go to bed and sleep happily now.And there's your problem. Thanks for playing.
I didn't know about Morocco.
Yeah bro, first country to recognise them as an independent state and the first to sign a bilateral treaty. To be fair, France wasn't too far behind.
Fair point. But 49 % is still a high number of voters. Also there is a reason why they have electoral colleges in the US. I don't have time to explain it right now but in short it's so that the vote is more even
yes they areThey're still mainstream media though.
Fair point. But 49 % is still a high number of voters. Also there is a reason why they have electoral colleges in the US. I don't have time to explain it right now but in short it's so that the vote is more even
Also been an awfully tough fight logistically.Except this is right on Russia's doorstep, as close to them as Cuba is to the US. Which is another reason why its a tough one to justify for America politically.
So hold on are you saying that the electoral colleges should not be used anymore?Too bad Trump only got46% of the vote. And you are wrong about why the electoral college exists it is not to make the vote more even. It does not have anything at all to do with making the vote even. For all intents and pimposed all 100% of the electoral votes could be won by one candidate and it would have worked as intended.
I'd say nice wumming but I suspect you actually believe the stupid things you are typing.
Yeah you can't expect a president or his advisors to be smart.People need to ease up on Trump - he has 'given the information' or 'heard' it - he isn't responsible for what he says.
sheesh...some people!
Yes it didThe reason being to prevent a dangerous, populist, demagogue from taking power. That went well.
So hold on are you saying that the electoral colleges should not be used anymore?
OMG you are so ignorant. DO you realise that your posts make no sense? Sorry, no of course you don't. Now if you have time to talk about what electoral colleges are there for, then knock yourself outLol talk about a reading comprehension failure.
Yes it did
So hold on are you saying that the electoral colleges should not be used anymore?
Knew that was coming. That's a cheap shot. Of all the things I said you only read that which is relevant to your agenda while failing to address my points. But thanks you can go to bed and sleep happily now.
Maybe they are. But seems that all this time nothing has changed in the US. Maybe there's a reason for that.They shouldn't. They are inherently undemocratic.
No it made sense to any who know what the electoral college is for and it is not to even out the vote.OMG you are so ignorant. DO you realise that your posts make no sense? Sorry, no of course you don't. Now if you have time to talk about what electoral colleges are there for, then knock yourself out
I'm also convinced that you're just trolling now. Like your Mar a lago comment
Maybe they are. But seems that all this time nothing has changed in the US. Maybe there's a reason for that.
OMG you are so ignorant. DO you realise that your posts make no sense? Sorry, no of course you don't. Now if you have time to talk about what electoral colleges are there for, then knock yourself out
I'm also convinced that you're just trolling now. Like your Mar a lago comment
Sorry but I can't address a point which I don't know about.You're the one who chose not to address what I said was the most important point because you're not informed. You cheap shotted yourself.
How on earth is the next step nukes? MAD means nukes aren't even worth discussing, the absolute worst case scenario would have been exactly the same fighting we saw anyway except that the Ukrainians would have been supplemented by US troops/equipment and therefore many more times formidable. With Russia already suffering economically and the EU likely to increase sanctions on them they couldn't have sustained their push for long, Putin wouldn't have bothered attempting it in the first place.
But he saw into Obama's mind and saw that all there would be was temporary economic sanction, a price worth paying. Would he have seen the same in Trump's?
I don't think the electoral college system should be dismantled but it should be revised to better reflect the demographic changes within certain states, ie California and New York should probably get a few more votes and perhaps Montana losing a vote.So hold on are you saying that the electoral colleges should not be used anymore?
I spoke about mar a Lago, and you're convinced wrongly of that merely because you're uninformed.
Nah you keep cheap shooting.Thanks again. Go to sleep (and next time post a link about mar a lago so it can also be debunkedI spoke about mar a Lago, and you're convinced wrongly of that merely because you're uninformed.
Too bad Trump only got46% of the vote. And you are wrong about why the electoral college exists it is not to make the vote more even. It does not have anything at all to do with making the vote even. For all intents and purposes all 100% of the electoral votes could be won by one candidate and it would have worked as intended.
I'd say nice wumming but I suspect you actually believe the stupid things you are typing.
"I don't have time to explain it right now"Too bad Trump only got46% of the vote. And you are wrong about why the electoral college exists it is not to make the vote more even. It does not have anything at all to do with making the vote even. For all intents and purposes all 100% of the electoral votes could be won by one candidate and it would have worked as intended.
I'd say nice wumming but I suspect you actually believe the stupid things you are typing.
What are you talking about
By feck do I hope you are asking rhetorically and not expecting a sensible answer.