Are you Corey Lewandowski? Isn't it too early for all this gloating?
The Trump Presidency | Biden Inaugurated
- Thread starter Raoul
- Start date
- Status
Are you Corey Lewandowski? Isn't it too early for all this gloating?
So based on the non-answers and attempting pivots and hyperboles, that's a errr yes then....?
I have no skin in the game, I can't even vote, no affiliation to the nation per se.
But people laughing it all off or making hyperbole statements, or using their outlandish opinions as facts of how it will turn out, winds ME up!
I'd rather an intellectual analysis of why these types of events are happening across the globe.
He used hashtags man, that means he wins the argument and is a grownup!
So you are wound up by an opinion on this forum that you want to wind them up in return? Isn't that the definition of a WUM?
I never bought into the "He is going to start WWIII" nonsense. He is an isolationist. Hillary was more likely to start wars. Though there was no fear of her blowing up the world either.
Other than some of the crazy stuff he has said...and unfortunately incited he seems a moderate Republican in policy terms or what he advocates.
Immigration, Jobs and Health seem to be his priority.
Lets see what he does.
The fact is he has pretty much said he needs help and has said he will be seeking Obama's council. He is not making a mistake there.
I don't want to prejudge him. We should give him a chance.
A counter argument or playing the devil's advocate to display the other side of the argument, I say....
Well if you want an intellectual analysis, the first thing you have to do is be intellectual yourself. Whatever man, knock yourself out.
absolutely fair.
Unless ofcourse there are systemic issues with each input poll (their estimating of turnout of different groups)
Please don't tell me, or tell yourself that this thread or the Election thread was anything other than a Hillary love-fest. Was almost impossible to get a word in without being ridiculed IMHO.
Looks like Bannon has an inside track to getting Chief of Staff.
Aggregators are well off either way. They get the credit when they call it right, and they blame the poll quality when it goes wrong
You did see the months and months in which people wanted Sanders instead of her, right? And the widespread recognition that she was an average candidate, but one who people felt was a much better choice than Trump?
Bull. No British government in the last 50 years would have legitimacy if that were the criterion. Tony Blair entered Downing Street with an overall majority and only one third of the popular vote.
The US constitution is state based: the concept of a national majority is not relevant.
Indeed. That's the sensible and pretty obvious train of thought the citizens need to follow.
Be that as it may, are you a conservative or a liberal? If you are a conservative, your gloating is in bad taste. If you are a liberal who is gloating because you didn't like Hillary and would have liked to see someone else nominated, your posts here are incredibly blase. As I said, you are welcome to post however you like, I'm just telling you what I think of your posts.
No, but it can at least be argued that every government who's gone in (or at least most of them) has done so on the basis of being the most popular of the options available. I mean, I still think the current British system is shite and needs changing too, but it's a joke that Trump has won the electoral college by a comfortable margin whilst finishing second.
Even if it's state based, the electoral college gives clear advantages to small states over larger ones, as has already been discussed.
I think he has already stated that he isn't aligned to any of those.
Paul Ryan won't be happy.
Wonder what Republican Senate and house will do if Trump carries on with his infrastructure spending plan. I bet he'll tie it up with either a Obamacare repeal or some social issue amendment and everyone will praise is business acumen
Nor will Bannon once he learns he has to shave and wear a suit.
Shouldnt Trump be prosecuted for his groping antics?
never heard of pop-culture references? Anyway. How about you find out by driving there?
Whats shocking about Trump is not just what he said, but how he said it. Someone who struggles to articulate two coherent sentences in a row will also struggle to follow coherent thinking-patterns. Trump might have pretended to be a racist to get elected, but he certainly didn't pretend to be incredibly daft. He just is as stupid as it gets.
I am neither, I am merely an observer - and I am a pragmatist.
Based on....?
Groping will be the new Benghazi/Email server hearings.
But it's essentially just a bigger version of the UK system, with the focus on "swing states" instead of "marginal constituencies". Even with a straight majority vote, you would still get this urban v rural divide leading to large parts of the country feeling cheated (e.g. in the EU referendum, where London, Manchester, Liverpool, Newcastle, Edinburgh all voted stay, with Leeds 50:50).
Based on what he says. He struggles to keep his mind focused on a coherent thought for more than 30s. Either he just jumps between ideas or he repeats the same meaningless phrases over and over again. Just listen to the man. It is the same with someone like Sarah Palin.
Language tells you something about someone’s mind; especially when he lacks the filter that most people have.
Even if you can't pick up the obvious clues from watching him "debate", his biographer has already confirmed he's a half-wit with the attention span of a two year old.
Just wow, now that is scary as the most powerful man on earth for 4 years. But I believe he won't make the mistake and will let some smarter people handle those complex topics then...
You think? Never struck me as someone willing to put his ego aside for the greater good.
Interesting.
I've just been reading about the "Redistricting" over the last 4 years in the US. To an outsider it looks similar to gerrymandering. What do you guys in the US think ?
Fascinating indeed
You clearly haven't done a shred of reading or research on the subject.
Probably no surprise therefore that you come across as such a staggering ignoramus.
You'd have been a guaranteed additional vote for Trump if you had qualified. Lucky for him he didn't need you.
Trump names his son in law and his three children to the executive committee of his transition team. Also names Pam Bondi, Peter Thiel and Bannon
- Status