Neutral
BTV
No doubt, I def will, although I have nothing on phone other than coc, clash royale, whatsapp, and fb.
yeah...I'm making sure you get screwed over buddy.
No doubt, I def will, although I have nothing on phone other than coc, clash royale, whatsapp, and fb.
Get away from the Pro-Russian stuff....he's even keeled and not a raving lunatic. He's going to help smooth over a lot of the shit Trump says and does with both allies and adversaries.
Why? Why should it be ignored that one of the most powerful government figures has interests in Russian sanctions being lifted?
'On Monday 20th February, parliament will be debating whether or not to allow Donald Trump a state visit. In coordination with One Day Without Us: UK National Protest, we are calling for a nationwide day of action to stand up and say no to the future of hatred, racism and division that Donald Trump is trying to create – and to say no to the disgraceful complicity of Theresa May and the British government in supporting him.
Protests this week saw tens of thousands take to the streets at just a day’s notice. With a bit of work we can make this national day of action massive! We’ve linked up with One Day Without Us, who are already running protests on the same day, to fight for migrants’ rights. Make sure to link up with them where you can. (www.1daywithoutus.org)
So on February 20th, organise! If you’re in London, join the march on parliament at 6pm.'
I actually think you should do another bingo card that predicts the content of Trump tweets.It's time... A few of them have turned up.
I don't see why that should have any bearing or whether or not someone chooses to protest... You protest because you want to make a statement, you want to do something. It's akin to not voting because you doubt your single vote will affect anything.Sorry to be bearer of bad news, but this debate has no influence or power whatsoever on forcing May to cancel the state visit.
Okay, that puts it into perspective. He's rotten, but not the most rotten of Trump's lot.@Crossie
@Cheesy
Y'all obviously missed the bit where Raoul said - 'best of' TRUMP's picks. He got more No votes than any SoS in history. So, people are aware of his background and some of his areas of conflict of interest. But, seeing as he's the guy for at least the next 4 years - you look at what positives he can bring.
I think when you compare him to the idiot savant Ben Carson...I hate the EPA head - Scott Pruitt....what does the Department of Energy do - Rick Perry...RExxon is obviously one of the more qualified cabinet picks.
In what sense? Tillerson's got lots of pro-Russian interests.
I acknowledge that you are quite enthusiastic about it but I don't share your optimism. I expect him to be as horrible as the other ones. That he refuses to hold a common presser with our Minister of Foreign Affairs who meets him today confirm my suspicion.
I don't see why that should have any bearing or whether or not someone chooses to protest... You protest because you want to make a statement, you want to do something. It's akin to not voting because you doubt your single vote will affect anything.
How so? The man's got literally no experience in politics or national security let alone conflicts of interest. Am I missing something?
Well yes but like I said I don't think that's reason not to protest, you can have that realism and still hope for the best. Rather protests against than sit back and accept...Protests are good and healthy for democracy, but time for a bit of realism about this debate. MPs will show up to make their views known, but there wont be a vote.
I know you guys are way more intellectual than anything on the right, the left is so superior they can't understand they lost the elections to an outsider and may take months maybe years for them to understand the Republicans won this elections.....get over.
Well yes but like I said I don't think that's reason not to protest, you can have that realism and still hope for the best. Rather protests against than sit back and accept...
Gonna have to disagree, he will be learning on the job as that will become clear as time goes by, trust me. Obviously we hope that he can get a handle on it but that's no given. They are clearly not the same field of experience, far from it.Government experience is obviously a plus, but in his case he has comparable private sector experience, including similar experience to what is required by the SecState job in terms of dealing with foreign leaders, advancing policy positions, negotiating etc. At Exxon, he was in charge of over 83,000 employees. The State Department only has about 30,000 and a significantly smaller budget than Exxon. I think he will be fine and a good counterbalance to Trump's antics.
Another one for the bingo card... Well done.I'll be working that day, trying to earn a crust for my family.
It doesn't change the facts. It's standard to hold these common pressers, it's considered a diplomatic insult if you don't.That's news to me. Today is literally his first day on the job and he's only beginning to meet his own staff, much less hold pressers with foreigners.
And the right talks about liberals virtue signalling.I'll be working that day, trying to earn a crust for my family.
Gonna have to disagree, he will be learning on the job as that will become clear as time goes by, trust me. Obviously we hope that he can get a handle on it but that's no given. They are clearly not the same field of experience, far from it.
Chain link fence for the win.
A wall you can see through
Oh you mean what we already have...gotcha.
@Crossie
@Cheesy
Y'all obviously missed the bit where Raoul said - 'best of' TRUMP's picks. He got more No votes than any SoS in history. So, people are aware of his background and some of his areas of conflict of interest. But, seeing as he's the guy for at least the next 4 years - you look at what positives he can bring.
I think when you compare him to the idiot savant Ben Carson...I hate the EPA head - Scott Pruitt....what does the Department of Energy do - Rick Perry...RExxon is obviously one of the more qualified cabinet picks.
He did what he had to for Exxon at the time. If that involved coziying up to Putin to advance Exxon's interests then that's what he had to do. I'm fairly confident he understands the fact that he is now representing an entire country and not an oil company.
Well yes but like I said I don't think that's reason not to protest, you can have that realism and still hope for the best. Rather protests against than sit back and accept...
Well from what I've seen over the past week or so, I think he will push through his agenda regardless. Effectively rewriting law to fit what he wants, or using legal loopholes...Will he have any problems implementing his policies - if his executive orders are overruled, can he override the ruling ? And what about the filibuster firewall - does it still exist, if so, will that go down the pan ?
Government experience is obviously a plus, but in his case he has comparable private sector experience, including similar experience to what is required by the SecState job in terms of dealing with foreign leaders, advancing policy positions, negotiating etc. At Exxon, he was in charge of over 83,000 employees. The State Department only has about 30,000 and a significantly smaller budget than Exxon. I think he will be fine and a good counterbalance to Trump's antics.
Nancy Pelosi not pulling any punches
Well from what I've seen over the past week or so, I think he will push through his agenda regardless. Effectively rewriting law to fit what he wants, or using legal loopholes...
I can't believe no one noticed we're on page 420.
Yeah. Amazing what he's done in a week. Makes you realise what lazy slobs politicians are compared to this go-getter.