The Trump Presidency | Biden Inaugurated

Status
Not open for further replies.
lYbcAZ2.jpg
Of course this makes the blood of any upright republican boil. If you want to have cancer, you should bloody pay for it yourself!!1


btw - hast this been posted yet? Apologies if it has.

C2N5lYBXEAA7eG9.jpg:large
 
Sooooo your point is?

But anyway, fair play for making fun of someone not dying from cancer. Top class.

You don't think it's hypocritical for someone who regards funding an expensive health service as a moral imperative to try to minimize his personal contribution?

Though it's in questionable taste to use a serious illness to score political points, I wasn't mocking the guy who wrote the tweet. Merely noting the liberal ascription of moral virtue to political opinions which cost them nothing.
 
You don't think it's hypocritical for someone who regards funding an expensive health service as a moral imperative to try to minimize his personal contribution?

Though it's in questionable taste to use a serious illness to score political points, I wasn't mocking the guy who wrote the tweet. Merely noting the liberal ascription of moral virtue to political opinions which cost them nothing.

Did I say I did? And if we're really talking tax avoidance, I wonder who's going to be the biggest avoiders of them all...

And it is in very questionable taste.
 
You don't think it's hypocritical for someone who regards funding an expensive health service as a moral imperative to try to minimize his personal contribution?

Though it's in questionable taste to use a serious illness to score political points, I wasn't mocking the guy who wrote the tweet. Merely noting the liberal ascription of moral virtue to political opinions which cost them nothing.

Aren't the premiums set by the insurance companies and not the ACA itself? So if it's too expensive why aren't the insurance companies held to account?
 
Farage so far up Trump's arse on 'Ridge on Sunday'. Saying how Trump has "knocked it out of the park" with his appointments by not going for career politicians.
 
Aren't the premiums set by the insurance companies and not the ACA itself? So if it's too expensive why aren't the insurance companies held to account?

We're straying too far from the point here. We'll be drinking tea with Vladimir Putin before the end of the page.

(Donald will have to drink his tea first though. Made from water boiled in the best samovar. Solid gold.)
 
We're straying too far from the point here. We'll be drinking tea with Vladimir Putin before the end of the page.

(Donald will have to drink his tea first though. Made from water boiled in the best samovar. Solid gold.)

What is the point, though? That ACA is funded by taxes? That some liberals don't pay taxes? I don't get it. A tax-funded system possible saved this guy's life, but the main takeaway is that he stole money from (only) conservative hard-workers? I really don't understand.
 
We're straying too far from the point here. We'll be drinking tea with Vladimir Putin before the end of the page.

(Donald will have to drink his tea first though. Made from water boiled in the best samovar. Solid gold.)

But you talked about the personal contributions people have to put in as a result of the ACA, and isn't that the result (At least partly) of the insurance companies and the premiums they charge? But also the amount of amendments that the Republicans made to the Act before they allowed it to pass? (only to then complain about it more)
 
What is the point, though? That ACA is funded by taxes? That some liberals don't pay taxes? I don't get it. A tax-funded system possible saved this guy's life, but the main takeaway is that he stole money from (only) conservative hard-workers? I really don't understand.

Some day, Grasshopper, you will understand.
 
What is the point, though? That ACA is funded by taxes? That some liberals don't pay taxes? I don't get it. A tax-funded system possible saved this guy's life, but the main takeaway is that he stole money from (only) conservative hard-workers? I really don't understand.

He's trolling you, nothing else to understand. :lol:
 
@berbatrick @vi1lain

My first post was a mild joke suggesting that since Obama hadn't personally paid for the guy's treatment, his moral claim to effusive expressions of gratitude was dubious. I don't know enough about the details of Obamacare to discuss it intelligently.
 
Like you have a good reason to believe so with no info on that bill like who's the guy or even anything on that bill saying ACA
The guy who's posted it is (clearly) saying it is. There's no reason to assume he's lying other than you wanting to because it suits.
 
@berbatrick @vi1lain

My first post was a mild joke suggesting that since Obama hadn't personally paid for the guy's treatment, his moral claim to effusive expressions of gratitude was dubious. I don't know enough about the details of Obamacare to discuss it intelligently.


That's never stopped you before.
 
@berbatrick @vi1lain

My first post was a mild joke suggesting that since Obama hadn't personally paid for the guy's treatment, his moral claim to effusive expressions of gratitude was dubious. I don't know enough about the details of Obamacare to discuss it intelligently.

Nice joke. Ugh.
 
Anything that comes from internet I mostly don't believe so if someone posts a bill with no information at all goes to my conspiracy theories folder.
What possible reason would he have to lie?

Are you suggesting there are no people who are being helped in that way by the ACA?

It's good to know you are so comfortable jumping on a cancer patient. Trump would be proud.
 
Plenty of Americans have posted on places like Reddit on how they had illnesses/accidents and Obamacare/ACA saved them a lot of money.
 
This "failed" spy is looking more and more credible, since the dossier was leaked.

The head of MI6 used information obtained by former officer Christopher Steele in his Trump investigation, in a warning against Russian cyberattacks and attempts to subvert Western democracies, The Independent has learned.

Sir Alex Younger’s briefing notes for his first public speech as head of the Secret Intelligence Service contained some of the material supplied by Mr Steele, according to security sources

Security sources stress that MI6 had extensive information, British and international, on the Russian threat apart from that of Mr Steele. But they pointed out that he is held in high regard and the contribution he provided was valuable.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...e-russia-documents-alex-younger-a7528681.html
 
Status
Not open for further replies.