Kinsella
Copy & Paste Merchant
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2012
- Messages
- 3,245
Why is it contentious in principle to have a citizenship question (perhaps it should be a nationality question) on the census form? It seems rather odd to me not to have one.
Why is it contentious in principle to have a citizenship question (perhaps it should be a nationality question) on the census form? It seems rather odd to me not to have one.
The question is not condusive to accurately determining the overall population of the United States.
Or more people in the generation of new voters that emerged between those elections found themselves more concerned with individual rights issues or environmental issues and sided with the Libs and Greens.
Speaking to reporters at the White House, Trump said you need the census citizenship question “for many reasons.”
“Number one, you need it for Congress — you need it for Congress for districting,” he said Friday. “You need it for appropriations — where are the funds going? How many people are there? Are they citizens? Are they not citizens? You need it for many reasons.”
Take note of that first one. Not only was a redistricting rationale not mentioned by the administration in its failed legal defense of the question, but it was actually something the other side argued was the administration’s true motivation.
...
Basically, Republicans would like to be able to draw districts according to the number of voting-age citizens, rather than total population, because that would increase the power of rural and more conservative areas with fewer noncitizens. The problem is they don’t have the data necessary to attempt it — and then hope it passes legal muster. Adding a citizenship question would give them the data tool they need.
Is a trend necessary for a new social movement?Is there a trend from 2012 -> 14 -> 16 -> 18 for libertarian and green votes? No, the 2016 presidential election stands out.
Is a trend necessary for a new social movement?
The cencus. Little donkey little donkeyI can't see that happening. The census is already being printed and it would be a monumentally difficult, timely and very, very costly exercise getting it changed now.
I mean, I wouldn't put it past him, and he may well try, but I just think he's left it a bit late.
The census exists to find out who's a citizen and who's not .The census exists to count everyone in the country, regardless of citizenship status. It’s a needless question and could lead to an inaccurate count due to low participation.
YesIs a trend necessary for a new social movement?
Which is what I said could have happened... that they showed themselves for the first time as a voting bloc in 2016.Yes. How else would you quantify a new generation with different views entering the voter pool?
All you see is a spike in one election in 2016.
If it is new, how can there be a trend?
That’s not true. It exists to find out how many people are living within our borders.The census exists to find out who's a citizen and who's not .
Which is what I said could have happened... that they showed themselves for the first time as a voting bloc in 2016.
You wouldn’t expect to see them in a midterm election where there’s no national libertarian or green candidate running.Where did they go in 2018? Why weren't they there in the 2016 congressional races? Do you expect the same numbers in 2020?
If they determine that out of 700,000 people in a congressional district there are tens of thousands who do not hold citizenship, they will work to exclude those people in the population when redistricting. That can change congress a great deal.Given that I don't live in the US, I have little awareness of the specifics around such issues. Although it's perhaps a little easier to predict the interpretations that those from the opposing ends of the political spectrum will have on them.
People tend to view things through the prism of their own experience I suppose and every census form I've ever completed has contained a nationality, and passport iirc, question on it. It's also mandatory to bring some sort of official identification, like a passport or driver's licence, with you in order to vote in an election.
You wouldn’t expect to see them in a midterm election where there’s no national libertarian or green candidate running.
Okay. That can be easily explained by apathy or frustration caused by the Trump administration’s obvious rejection of what their values are.the voteshare for both parties dropped in 2018 compared to 2016 and 2014 *congressional* elections.
Given that I don't live in the US, I have little awareness of the specifics around such issues. Although it's perhaps a little easier to predict the interpretations that those from the opposing ends of the political spectrum will have on them.
People tend to view things through the prism of their own experience I suppose and every census form I've ever completed has contained a nationality, and passport iirc, question on it. It's also mandatory to bring some sort of official identification, like a passport or driver's licence, with you in order to vote in an election.
Given that I don't live in the US, I have little awareness of the specifics around such issues. Although it's perhaps a little easier to predict the interpretations that those from the opposing ends of the political spectrum will have on them.
People tend to view things through the prism of their own experience I suppose and every census form I've ever completed has contained a nationality, and passport iirc, question on it. It's also mandatory to bring some sort of official identification, like a passport or driver's licence, with you in order to vote in an election.
Okay. That can be easily explained by apathy or frustration caused by the Trump administration’s obvious rejection of what their values are.
I know what Occam’s Razor is.
Not sure where you are from.
But it is natural to distrust a government that historically has used otherwise common sense tools to suppress voting.
For example. An ID, required to vote, should be easy to get right? Well what you see is that states that previously engaged in voter suppression with poll taxes and arcane literacy tests (this one is my favorite) now create these arduous loopholes that make it impossible for many to get IDs, hence keeping the vote down in practice.
Without the history of feckery, then a citizenship question or an ID requirement for voting would be kosher.
This country is still dealing with the Civil War and Reconstruction, so we definitely are dealing with issues from the Civil Rights Era.That all assumes that the government is a never changing entity, handed down through some sort of aristocratic order. Although prior to Trump a Bush or a Clinton had held a cabinet position since the '80s...
In other words does there come a point where such positions actually perpetuate that which they seek to remedy? If America is still contending with these kinds of issues 40 or 50 years from now, then something's really not right.
This country is still dealing with the Civil War and Reconstruction, so we definitely are dealing with issues from the Civil Rights Era.
And it is historically true that the conservatives have pursued a campaign of voter suppression of people of color since they gained the right to vote with the 15th amendment.
I’d love to live in a South where the majority of the white population doesn’t say “we lost the Civil War”.What is the end point though? Can you describe the destination.
I’d love to live in a South where the majority of the white population doesn’t say “we lost the Civil War”.
If this is in reference to voter ID issues, I watched a couple of videos on Youtube in the last half hour which are...interesting -
“We won”Fair enough. How would someone from the North answer the question though?
Why is it contentious in principle to have a citizenship question (perhaps it should be a nationality question) on the census form? It seems rather odd to me not to have one.
Rather than just posting YouTube videos (of street interviews?), could you perhaps describe your position yourself?
What is the end point though? Can you describe the destination.
If this is in reference to voter ID issues, I watched a couple of videos on Youtube in the last half hour which are...interesting -