And now he's writing about himself in the third person...
The Trump Presidency | Biden Inaugurated
- Thread starter Raoul
- Start date
- Status
This isn't Trey Gowdy doing the same Benghazi investigation over and over. This is Robert Mueller and federal indictments. It may not lead right to Trump as that is the nature of passing the buck but his son and son in law are toast. I think trump inc will be his downfall, his family business is basically a money laundering outfit.
Everybody seems to have come begging for his (Russia's) money and attention but when asked no one anything about it. He is fecking delusional, past the point where a person can function in normal society, yet he is the president.
Massive meltdown over the tweet on the morning shows. The President of the United States basically suggesting a prominent female Senator was prepared to give him sexual favors in exchange for campaign contributions.
Is he actually admitting to sexual harassment?
When Russia realizes that backing him was a dead end and he's eventually out of office, his empire would crumble. Give it time.
Its a shame that its unlikely he will land up in jail.
I dont get the "USED" bit at the end of his tweet?
Hopefully. Congress has already passed more sanctions on Russia that he criticized and has yet to sign. He is definitely caught in the middle and no matter what way he steps he is fecked.
It’s implying that he is the victim.
With Trump, its probably means the worst thing one can imagine.
Imagine Gillibrand's tweet will wind up with hundreds of thousands of likes later today
Very disloyal to Bill and 'Crooked Hilary' Clinton, clearly. Not clear what he is hinting at apart from that this Gillibrand woman offered him - in his office - something in return for campaign donations. How can he get away with that?
EDIT: And he is saying that now she is being 'used', apparently by his enemies? That's my guess.
Last edited:
Deny sexual assaults in one tweet.
Talk about a female senator "and would do anything for them" in the next.
Yeesh.
Talk about a female senator "and would do anything for them" in the next.
Yeesh.
Ok indicating that someone 'would do anything' doesn't equate to sexual assault/harassment...
Exactly.... I'm guessing lots of people look electable now (based on comparisons to the corrupt cnuts that have made it to the top), the new normal. Y'all need to learn from this not head down the same road that's been shown up for what it is. Have higher standards, expect more from your politicians...
Yes. I still read but I'm not as engaged as I used to be, and even when I'm shocked I can't be bothered to comment most of the time...
Holy feck did he just suggest she offered him sex?
No, he suggested that she offered something substantial. It could be sex or smuggling drug into the US or rigging elections or assassinating someone, anything.
Whatever it was it is a despicable statement to make about a member of government.
It is, I am still trying to wrap my head around it, it's the type of attitude that you expect from the worst political people on earth, autocrats and other criminal-politicians.
Disagree with that. In the context of the current discussion that he himself is now part of in relation to sexual assault etc, it's spectacularly poor wording of whatever the hell he was trying to insinuate and DOES sound pretty bad.
It's a new low for me. I like to think that with every vile tweet such as this he simply strengthens the will of those who are working to bring him down. And it will happen.....no man with the amount of enemies that Trump has, and continues to generate, can survive the long term. Deliciously his narcissm and his lack of intelligence leaves him blind to it.
Yeah, the "she'd do anything for..." thing has a pretty well understood implication. "She's a whore."
He'll wiggle out of it because of the technical ambiguity though, as per.
The problem is that it also strengthen his supporters backing because while that type of tweets are basically what you would expect from a Zuma, Mugabe or El Chapo, he has been elected on that platform.
I agree here... But the tweet's too ambigous, It could be what you all assume (reasonable assumption too), but it's still an assumption about what you think he specifically means.
Yes. He is pretty much confirming everything that his victims have said about him.
Trump's Tweet is so childish that even Roy Moore would date it.
Charges have already come out of the investigation, but I think Muller is going to bring more.
Well done.This old classic.
Yup, he's gone lower. Also, his random capitalisation of words really fecking pisses me off. Argh!
I think these many people he keeps talking about are mostly inside his own head.
"And/or have never met." Means he has definitely never met them. Which could be a bit of a problem if he in fact actually has met at least one of those women. You'd almost get the impression he's not sane.
He's Carl Spackler.
I guess we'll begin impeachment proceeding as soon as McConnell gets primaried by a Bannon acolyte in Kentucky.
Excellent
They had plenty of time to work a credible reasoning behind this tweet. I don't believe it for a minute.
- Status