Weird post. Joshua is a much better boxer than Wilder. If you accept that (and you should, if you have eyes) it means that Joshua is going to land punches on Wilder. First. Punches that Wilder, chinny and sloppy as he is, isn't going to be able to absorb.
Wilder doesn't have any kind of notable head movement, either. The guy struggled with Molina, FFS.
OK let me explain my position with Wilder and him fighting conventional boxers as well as the logic that comes with it: common sense tells us that a conventional boxer who has been taught to throw punches along the best lines possible should meet his target first
@Andersons Dietician made the point a few posts ago and it's spot on when two conventional boxers have the same aims from the same school of thought: technique is huge then.
When an unconventional boxer comes along with tools that get them to the top, the conventional boxer has to be much better in fundamentals to compensate or to negate whatever the unconventional boxer is getting by on, when it happens, the unconventional boxer's gravy train is pretty much over.
As far as I can see Joshua has an elite uppercut and everything else isn't at a tier where he negates Wilder's tools for people to be calling it a non-competitive bout.
A jab can be rolled with and a bomb fired back - Joshua's jab isn't this amazing weapon he controls fights with and he hasn't the stamina to throw it with conviction for an extended period of time so what I struggle with is the notion Joshua is just going to go in there and make light work of someone who legitimately throws bombs that need to be avoided at all costs whilst having no means of doing so. I think apart from being overly muscular, that lack of movement is the other reason some liken him to Bruno.
It's easy to say he'll stop stuff at source but he's not considerably faster and it's arguable he's faster at all and he doesn't have the juice in the tank to snap shots for extended periods of time.
I'd better understand the elevation of Joshua if he was showing linear progression post Klitschko, but he isn't, is he? The Takam fight wasn't impressive, I'm away so haven't seen the Parker fight, but the impression is it wasn't great either. The biggest issue is he's there to be hit and that, for me, is the equalizer between them and even more so when that vaunted extra weight causes the inevitable slowdown in the middle rounds and with even less intense output, you've got a huge immobile target.
Not going to mention Wilder as
@Raoul has outlined nothing changes with him, but him being a joke when his potential opponent doesn't move is quite baffling.