- Joined
- Aug 2, 2014
- Messages
- 141
Good luck to him and all that. Really thought he'd make a bigger impression here but, cups aside, it just hasn't clicked. This season in particular has been absolutely dire.
The utter incompetence of not sacking him before the season if this was what they were gonna do. I mean, it's good that we move on from Ten Hag, but I have no confidence whatsoever in that they will get the next manager right.
Not really. We are on course for 45 points which will have us mid table.The thing people have to realize when saying this, is if nothing changes we're getting relegated. Do you believe we will?
That assumes that Ten Hag was the only problem. That is incorrect, in my view. He was a major part, but the factors that led to him failing were quite similar to those that led to previous managers failing, and they're rooted in the kind of environment we create for new managers as a club.
Imagine being a CEO who is hiring a series of people to work for you in your company, giving them what you think are the best tools, and when they keep failing you keep firing and replacing them.
At some point the shareholders above you should realize it's not the people you're hiring or the tools you're giving them, it's you. It's time to change CEOs. In our case, it's continued even into a new CEO for the first firing of their tenure.
One can only hope they hire better.
Not really. We are on course for 45 points which will have us mid table.
What gave you that idea? It's just that this isn't exactly a good look IMO and it, at the very least, appears completely incompetent. I'd be happy to admit I was wrong in a year.Right, so you have no faith in them because they chose not to sack him last season?
So you were part of the fans that didn't think the structure at the club as an issue?
Shouldn't need a rebuild. A good enough manager should be able to get more out of these players and improve them. There is a good enough team here, that just needs added to.
People will think the players are not good enough, but that is because the manager was doing a terrible job.
What gave you that idea? It's just that this isn't exactly a good look IMO and it, at the very least, appears completely incompetent. I'd be happy to admit I was wrong in a year.
Every underpeforming player in a long run should be gone. Apply that standard to everyone. ETH is gone, it's time to clear the mess he left, but what was the narration few months ago ? He stays because he can actually win a cup. Suddenly it's not the narration, and he's gone.It really sounds like you literally want to get rid of every single player in the squad. We've effectively done that bar a handful over the last couple of seasons, and you're saying that's not enough so obviously you think that every single one of them needs to go. So what's your idea of a clear out now? Every single player in the current squad? Only the ones who were here before ETH? The ones who have been here longer than one season?
Also, what do you mean that managers have paid the price so now it's time to judge the players? The players have been judged and replaced far more often than the managers. We've gone through five managers, none of whom have gone on to do anything better and prove us wrong (obviously ETH has only just been fired). Meanwhile we've gone though what feels like about 100 players, with some of them going on to have quite good success elsewhere (much more than any of the managers).
Nobody is saying we should be hiring and firing managers every couple of months. But we should act like a top club that actually has standards. The likes of Real, Barca, Bayern and PSG have all gone through more managers than we have despite being much more successful during the same period.
But since Ratcliffe bought part of the club, everything has changed except the manager. All the stuff before Ratcliffe and the failings are not related. As the club set up was completely different.
P128 | W70 | D23 | L35 | scored 217 | conceded 165 | win % 54.69 |
Big Dave sends his regards.
i thought it’s how you start easing your forearm into someone. at least that’s how my uncle showed me.A gesture used plenty in Italy where he currently is. It's a gesture that tends to be used in disagreement, frustration, or disbelief.
What's the loss % for them? And what about those stats when you keep it to PL games?
P128 W70 D23 L35 scored 217 conceded 165 win % 54.69
Above was Ten Hag's record with United. Ole for the record got to manage the club for 40 matches more and Ole left with win percentage of 54.17%.
They saw how the fanbase reacted to the cup win and they folded, it's that simple. So we already have clear evidence of weak leadership. In an alternate universe we lost that final and we have a new manager already.The utter incompetence of not sacking him before the season if this was what they were gonna do. I mean, it's good that we move on from Ten Hag, but I have no confidence whatsoever in that they will get the next manager right.
I can’t say I agree. We gave Ten Hag a solid platform to build success upon, and he failed. We’ve had numerous issues within the club in the past decade, but this is one instance where it’s clear the manager was the limiting factor. He received an extremely generous amount of time and understanding, and he was very well-funded in recruitment. Ultimately the manager is responsible for the performances on the pitch, and this has been unacceptable for far too long.
He probably can't believe that we didn't sack him in May like so many of us.A gesture used plenty in Italy where he currently is. It's a gesture that tends to be used in disagreement, frustration, or disbelief.
I really need someone to explain this one to me without making silly comparisons such as Ole. And I should insist on the fact that I'm really interested in Xavi or anyone else.
Xavi took over a mess and won the league, he is the one that either introduced or developed nearly all the kids that are currently shining and where shining with him and for Spain. Also for the Flick current love, Xavi has had similar periods with Barcelona in 2022-2023. To me he seems to be naive when it comes to big fixtures but he didn't fail with Barcelona and he is one of the big reasons they didn't totally collapse after the financial scandals because he relied on kids without issue.
Should have higher hopes than that. Has won one trophy in five seasons with Arsenal and whenever they play a decent team and are lucky enough to take the lead he choose to park the bus and hopes it's enough to win.RvN is one of my favorite players of all time, so the dream for me is that he somehow becomes the perfect manager for us who also happens to be a great man manager. Obviously, I can't see it happening, but would be nice if he could be our Arteta.
I think we can. The structures for success are now in place. My preference is Southgate. He transformed the England set-up, making us genuine contenders for the major tournaments. His media savvy and man management skills are impressive and possibly just what we need to get the most out of our expensively assembled squad. I think he would create a positive vibe, so long absent from Old Trafford. There is a lot of speculation about Xavi but I think Utd need to get back to basics and nobody knows the English game and mentality like Southgate.Forgive me for my lack of confidence that we can hire a successful replacement
PL games was posted up by the PL themselves today.What's the loss % for them? And what about those stats when you keep it to PL games?
Generally I think Cruyff is credited as being the first one to introduce it to Barca. So it goes back quite a ways and has since obv been used and perfected under other managers.Did he implement tiki taka at Barcelona? We're best at chaos football. We need a nutcase of a manager, it's a shame Roy Keane has mellowed.