Ten Hag sacked | Ruud appointed Interim Manager

Pretty much. I'll never understand the blind backing of a manager, it's like Gary Neville banging on about not believing in sacking managers. Imagine this in any other industry. @pocco is right for calling this out.

Being entrenched in these views is probably due to growing up with SAF but SAF was a different breed to the managers nowadays, none of them will ever come close to him
Gary said that whilst sacking managers at Salford on the regular. Which makes you wonder why he's the total opposite when it comes to United.
 
I do want what's best for the club, that's why I'm pissed off at people like him. He was more concerned about being right then what is best for the club. The post I'm referring to was a prefect example.

I just hope that these people have learnt from this and never get so entrenched again. Obviously one man alone isn't a problem, but when half the fecking fanbase is in some deluded alternative reality, it's a problem. Now they'll talk about hope exciting it all is after telling us there's no standout candidate for months on end. Go figure.
Give it a rest mate, you were VP89 before VP89 ever posted in Caf, just that the manager was called back then David Moyes.

EtH is out, which is the most important thing, no need to remind others how wrong they were, let's move on and hope that the new manager, Amorim or whoever it is, is actually not a total clown, and finally we start improving and become successful again.
 
Ruud would be moving on once Amorim is appointed? Any news on what his future looks like?
Surely he knew when joining that Ten Hag wasn't doing well and could go even earlier than he did. Unless he is genuinely not liked and isn't getting a response out of the forwards then he should be kept on really, otherwise we just made him sign a contract to then pay him out on it after a couple of months of work.
 
Be interesting to see how Ruud sets up today and if he defers from the 4-2-3-1 formation which just doesn't suit our players at the moment. Love to see him with a 3-4-3 or a high pressing 4-3-3. Be some kick to Ten Hag if he has us flying with a new formation and proper pressing after only a few days!

Unfortunately Ten Hags biggest problem was 600 million spent and we are still no where near a possession team so was time to go. Ten Hag was unable to adapt to our players and was to stubborn to change the system. We were setup the same every single match bar some games the defense was higher.
 
Please read New
Silly that this needs to be highlighted again but any managerial or player threads should be civil and respectful with no personal insults thrown toward the player, manager or other posters. Criticism of their tenure, form, ability or post is fine, but crossing the personal line isn't. That includes snidy comments trying to get people to gang up on posters or tagging them (or not) to try and get reactions. Posts will either be deleted or given warnings. Ta.
 
Surely he knew when joining that Ten Hag wasn't doing well and could go even earlier than he did. Unless he is genuinely not liked and isn't getting a response out of the forwards then he should be kept on really, otherwise we just made him sign a contract to then pay him out on it after a couple of months of work.
Yes but we can ask Amorim to keep him in the coaching staff. At least for this year so that Amorim integration is smooth. Wanted to know if there is any news regarding that?

Letting go of Ruud in just 2-3 months doesn’t feel right at least to me. He seems to have respect of the squad and has track record of being a good coach.
 
This is the most bizarre of all our managerial sagas (and that's saying something). I'm not one for calling for the managers head, but how this guy survived for so long, considering some of the utter trouncings we've had, is incredible. Must have one hell of an agent.
 
Silly that this needs to be highlighted again but any managerial or player threads should be civil and respectful with no personal insults thrown toward the player, manager or other posters. Criticism of their tenure, form, ability or post is fine, but crossing the personal line isn't. That includes snidy comments trying to get people to gang up on posters or tagging them (or not) to try and get reactions. Posts will either be deleted or given warnings. Ta.
Can I also add to this that going outside exists.
 
This is the most bizarre of all our managerial sagas (and that's saying something). I'm not one for calling for the managers head, but how this guy survived for so long, considering some of the utter trouncings we've had, is incredible. Must have one hell of an agent.

Its only bizzare if you dont take context into it. I guess things are black and white with you?

Context? First season got 3rd and trophy = good season
2nd season - fails miserably = should be sacked

That's how you probably look at it.

However; in his second season, we had the takeover to deal with, so there was no chance Glazers were making a change whilst INEOS took over in February, the first point of call was to do a complete review of the club and hire the correct structure. Something most fans are calling out for.. some may find us appointing a structure before bizzare.

Then he won a trophy in his 2nd season and had loads of injuries, the board reviewed his position and interviewed candidates, none of them really impressed.

Instead they said, okay lets see what you can do, whilst we appoint a CEO and DoF in July. They then needed to settle in at the club, whilst looking at the football. Once they realised, this man isn't suited for the job, Post Liverpool / Spurs, instead of reacting and sacking without a plan, they made a plan.

The plan was to appoint Amorim and once they found out he will come, they sacked Ten Hag and looking to appoint a manager within 1 week of sacking one.

That is not bizzare, its planning, rather than sacking a manager and playing on interim and loads of questions around the permanent manager.
 
Nice read in the Athletic article that basically confirms Ten Hag

1. Wanted to go into this season with McTominay and Amrabat rather than Ugarte
2. Wanted Danny Welbeck in to solve our goalscoring problems
3. Was responsible for us selling Alvaro despite having two crocked left backs
 
Nice read in the Athletic article that basically confirms Ten Hag

1. Wanted to go into this season with McTominay and Amrabat rather than Ugarte
2. Wanted Danny Welbeck in to solve our goalscoring problems
3. Was responsible for us selling Alvaro despite having two crocked left backs

Why can't we just let our former players leave in peace :lol:
 
Nice read in the Athletic article that basically confirms Ten Hag

1. Wanted to go into this season with McTominay and Amrabat rather than Ugarte
2. Wanted Danny Welbeck in to solve our goalscoring problems
3. Was responsible for us selling Alvaro despite having two crocked left backs
I mean, throw in 'Was responsible for us signing Antony and Mount' and you could sack him on this list alone, you don't need the results on top of it.
 


Incredible read. Forget Ten Hag, ithe article is also not a good look for Ineos considering the role they played through their costly indecisiveness. I wonder if Tuchel and De Zerbi developed cold feet during their talks with the club after sensing just how directionless we’ve become as an institution. On the other hand, Berrada seems like a breath of fresh air and I’m not surprised he led the charge to court Amorim going back to summer. We’ll need his forward thinking and expertise
 
Incredible read. Forget Ten Hag, ithe article is also not a good look for Ineos considering the role they played through their costly indecisiveness. I wonder if Tuchel and De Zerbi developed cold feet during their talks with the club after sensing just how directionless we’ve become as an institution. On the other hand, Berrada seems like a breath of fresh air and I’m not surprised he led the charge to court Amorim going back to summer. We’ll need his forward thinking and expertise

Exactly the opposite actually. INEOS understood that they dont have the expertise to make these calls, thus waited for footballing people to join in Berrada and Ashworth, let them deal with the footballing side.

It the opposite to directionless, its actually having a plan. They back their men, so have given them the responsibility to sack and hire a new manager.

You cant say a club is become directionless after 3 months of taking charge of a football club, that is silly. They reviewed the managerial role, interviewed candidates, weren't impressed and moved on letting the CEO and DoF make these decisions.
 
Think after a certain amount of time people will look back on his stint more fondly with less recency bias, like Ole.

He won us trophies after years going without. Last season we had a shit ton of injuries and everything that was going on behind the scenes with the club "sale." Not impossible to work through but incredibly difficult.

You just know in the right circumstances, with the right environment (like he had in Ajax) he can succeed. We need someone who can take us as we are now and do something, not wait around for the ideal circumstances to perform.
 
Think after a certain amount of time people will look back on his stint more fondly with less recency bias, like Ole.

He won us trophies after years going without. Last season we had a shit ton of injuries and everything that was going on behind the scenes with the club "sale." Not impossible to work through but incredibly difficult.

You just know in the right circumstances, with the right environment (like he had in Ajax) he can succeed. We need someone who can take us as we are now and do something, not wait around for the ideal circumstances to perform.
If he'd gone in the Summer then perhaps but not sure. I will only remember the shitty league performances of the last season and a bit.

I'll give him big credit for sticking up to Ronaldo and Sancho but will primarily remember scratching my head at what was supposed to be going on during matches.

Even now I don't have much of an idea on how we were supposedly set up to play.

If Amorim is confirmed I have a good feeling about this appointment - same young(er) coach, a viewed weaker league but I dunno he looks well worth a go. Will certainly give him a lot of time.
 
Exactly the opposite actually. INEOS understood that they dont have the expertise to make these calls, thus waited for footballing people to join in Berrada and Ashworth, let them deal with the footballing side.

It the opposite to directionless, its actually having a plan. They back their men, so have given them the responsibility to sack and hire a new manager.

You cant say a club is become directionless after 3 months of taking charge of a football club, that is silly. They reviewed the managerial role, interviewed candidates, weren't impressed and moved on letting the CEO and DoF make these decisions.

Berrada, Wilcox and Ashworth were in place when it was decided to extend ETH in summer in lieu of giving him the can and appointing another manager. A costly decision it turned out to be, and we all saw this coming
 
Think after a certain amount of time people will look back on his stint more fondly with less recency bias, like Ole.

He won us trophies after years going without. Last season we had a shit ton of injuries and everything that was going on behind the scenes with the club "sale." Not impossible to work through but incredibly difficult.

You just know in the right circumstances, with the right environment (like he had in Ajax) he can succeed. We need someone who can take us as we are now and do something, not wait around for the ideal circumstances to perform.

Ultimately club sales, player fueds, banned players and injury crises etc. weren't his undoing. His tactics and own inability to implement something resembling a working plan is what lead to his sacking. This video breaks down his tactical failings.

 
Its only bizzare if you dont take context into it. I guess things are black and white with you?

Context? First season got 3rd and trophy = good season
2nd season - fails miserably = should be sacked

That's how you probably look at it.

However; in his second season, we had the takeover to deal with, so there was no chance Glazers were making a change whilst INEOS took over in February, the first point of call was to do a complete review of the club and hire the correct structure. Something most fans are calling out for.. some may find us appointing a structure before bizzare.

Then he won a trophy in his 2nd season and had loads of injuries, the board reviewed his position and interviewed candidates, none of them really impressed.

Instead they said, okay lets see what you can do, whilst we appoint a CEO and DoF in July. They then needed to settle in at the club, whilst looking at the football. Once they realised, this man isn't suited for the job, Post Liverpool / Spurs, instead of reacting and sacking without a plan, they made a plan.

The plan was to appoint Amorim and once they found out he will come, they sacked Ten Hag and looking to appoint a manager within 1 week of sacking one.

That is not bizzare, its planning, rather than sacking a manager and playing on interim and loads of questions around the permanent manager.

The context is that we had been poor since the League Cup win.
 
Berrada, Wilcox and Ashworth were in place when it was decided to extend ETH in summer in lieu of giving him the can and appointing another manager. A costly decision it turned out to be, and we all saw this coming

Wrong.

Berrada said:
"Again, so in terms of the contract, that was a decision that was taken prior to both of our arrivals.

"But as I said before, we're very happy with that decision. Erik has our full backing and we have worked very closely together, as Dan said before, in this transfer window. We're going to continue working very closely with him to help him get the best results out of the team."

Ashworth said:
I didn't start until July 1, so none whatsoever [say in keeping Ten Hag]. All I can do is reiterate what I remember saying, I've really enjoyed working with Erik for the last eight weeks.

Source: MEN

I always thought it curious that they made an effort to distance themselves. Felt that didn't bode well for ETH.

As for Wilcox, as far as I know, he doesn't have the remit to hire and fire managers. He can probably make a recommendation, but that's it.
 
Wrong.





Source: MEN

I always thought it curious that they made an effort to distance themselves. Felt that didn't bode well for ETH.

As for Wilcox, as far as I know, he doesn't have the remit to hire and fire managers. He can probably make a recommendation, but that's it.

Werent Ashworth and Berrada exchanging emails when United supposedly tapped Ashworth up while they both were still employed by the barcodes and City? Naughty boys. That’s how it goes in private in business isn’t it? They flouted the rules and their public comments after officially taking their roles are cop outs to cover themselves in my opinion. Ashworth outed himself with his email blunder.They had to have put their direct input into the decision to keep ETH at the helm. I could be wrong
 
Berrada, Wilcox and Ashworth were in place when it was decided to extend ETH in summer in lieu of giving him the can and appointing another manager. A costly decision it turned out to be, and we all saw this coming

No they weren't. Berrada and Ashworth joined in July, but no point me discussing with you when you will deny the basics.
 
No they weren't. Berrada and Ashworth joined in July, but no point me discussing with you when you will deny the basics.

What basics? You’re going with public statements and official start dates but the evidence shows Berrada (while still a City employee) was representing United when the club tapped up Ashworth at Newcastle long before July. Are you refuting that?
 
What basics? You’re going with public statements and official start dates but the evidence shows Berrada (while still a City employee) was representing United when the club tapped up Ashworth at Newcastle long before July. Are you refuting that?

What evidence suggests that they started working before then?

Tapping up and working is 2 different things.

Its like saying, we know Amorin is manager, so the next few results will on him? Win lose or draw?

They might have had informal talks with the club and be part of decisions, but they were not allowed to go into a meeting with say Tuchel whilst not officially starting..

They definitely were not involved with meetings with agents before they joined, what you are trying to prove is all opinion that they were involved.

There is a reason why they paid Newcastle the fees to waive the gardening leave, because if they didn't and carried on working like you think they did, they would be in legal issues.
 
Werent Ashworth and Berrada exchanging emails when United supposedly tapped Ashworth up while they both were still employed by the barcodes and City? Naughty boys. That’s how it goes in private in business isn’t it?
i’m quite high up the corporate ladder at the multi-billion dollar company i work for, and i can confirm we send emails. all. the. time.
 
The press can't let go of the fact that they got it wrong about his sacking in the summer, do they ? Amusing really.