In reality, he is a coward who hides and deliberately positions himself near an opposing player so that he would not receive a pass whenever we are building up from the back.
I really wish people who said this kind of thing would get banned.
No player at this level of football hides from the ball. To even suggest as much is embarrassingly ignorant.
Gnarby had 24 touches in 63 minutes. Pellistri had 25 touches in 81 minutes.
Do they also hide from the ball?
What's with this random influx of Newbie Scotland fans whose only purpose on here is to defend McTominay?
Is it against the rules to stick up for Scott McTominay? /Rhetorical question.
Never realised that to be considered a Manchester United fan you must follow the crowd and not engage your brain.
I've been a Manchester United fan since the early 90s, mate.
I'll stuck up for whichever player I choose. Don't really need your permission.
I fail to subscribe to this mass hysteria bullshit. I think for myself. I'm weird like that.
If you don't like it. There's the door.
OK. Fine. It appears that criticising and scapegoating is the fashionable thing to do:
1st Bayern Munich goal was because of Onana treating the ball like it was a greased up watermelon. 2nd Bayern goal was because Eriksen and Casemiro didn't track Gnarby. Bayern's 3rd goal was because Eriksen thought he was playing Volleyball. Bayern's 4th was due to Casemiro not closing down and Lindelov leaving Tel in acres of space.
All this and yet Scott McTominay gets in the neck for a 21 minute cameo.
Is the Erikson Onana, Casemiro and Lindelov's performance threads all filled with torch and pitchfork weilding mobs, too?
What a strange bunch the RedCafe fans are.
I've been registered to a few football forums. I have never seen a fanbase flog, criticize and abuse their team's fans as much as people do here.