SARS CoV-2 coronavirus / Covid-19 (No tin foil hat silliness please)

Some countries are trying the BCG vaccine to see if it works. In theory it may work so India, Vietnam and even in UWA in Australia are trying it in trials. Incidentally in some small Asian countries everyone gets a BCG vaccine and a Polio vaccine at birth. Maldives is a good example. It looks like at this moment in time, they have about 86 confirmed cases and half are foreigners and 16 recovered and fortunately at this moment in time no deaths. But this figure is going to rise for sure as more people are tested. The good news maybe no deaths (so far). If and there is a big IF it is the BCG that seems to keep this under control then it is very good news. As far as the information I had from all these who has been tested positive only one man of 80 years is in ICU and he has had past complications of various underlying causes including a stroke and pneumonia too.
Sri Lanka has 310 positive cases and 7 deaths including some foreigners in this 7. From the 310 already 100 have recovered.

Heh. Up until a decade or so ago, it was part of the common child vaccine program in Norway. Nearly everyone got it at around 14. Probably wore off by now, though.
 
So certainly subject to a backlog, and you presume gets back updated?

Yes.

image.png


[Source] [.xlsx doc]
 
It is clutching at straws and if it shows it helps then we will go down that path. It is not that BCG is an effective cure but what they are testing is to see if BCG controls the immune system to attack the virus at the right level and not overload the system and control the cytokine that is secreted. I think this overloading by the immune system is what kills most people and not the virus itself. This is what these trials are for.
That's interesting. Old people (maybe the 75+ age group) won't have routinely had BCG as teenagers. I had it when I entered nursing and later worked as a midwife in a city where there was active TB. My heaf test mark became prominent more than once, which showed something was reacting to something.
 
It was breaking news on BBC news 24 just now. Don't know if that was just England or whole of U.K though.


If it is just England, Scotland/Wales/NI don't usually contribute a huge number so you'd expect this to be a total just under 700 or similar. Would be great if we could see another drop tomorrow.
 
Heh. Up until a decade or so ago, it was part of the common child vaccine program in Norway. Nearly everyone got it at around 14. Probably wore off by now, though.

BCG vaccine is a once a lifetime vaccination according to what I have heard.
 
Updated graph of deaths in England by day of death. Reported deaths were 778, 6 fewer than Saturday. Pretty confident we're on the slide now.

Orange is a 5 day trailing average. Last 5-7 days will see large to moderate upward changes:
E5yPjz8.jpg

Updated graph of deaths in England by day of death. Reported deaths were 665, 113 fewer than yesterday. Orange is a 5 day trailing average. Last 5-7 days will see large to moderate upward changes:
cnDFK8M.jpg
 
Last edited:
If it is just England, Scotland/Wales/NI don't usually contribute a huge number so you'd expect this to be a total just under 700 or similar. Would be great if we could see another drop tomorrow.

Correction it seems now, 759 in UK.
 
Actually wouldn't be shocked if the UK extended again after this current extension, with a view of studying how other nations coped with loosened restrictions.

I agree. Given there's a bank holiday in last week of May I think we'll see another two week extension up to then with perhaps a few more garden shops opened up.

Start of June is the critical point really seeing as the 12 week stay at home message for over 70s will be close to expiring.
 
It is clutching at straws and if it shows it helps then we will go down that path. It is not that BCG is an effective cure but what they are testing is to see if BCG controls the immune system to attack the virus at the right level and not overload the system and control the cytokine that is secreted. I think this overloading by the immune system is what kills most people and not the virus itself. This is what these trials are for.

Yeah, any research outcomes is useful at this moment I agree. The scientific data obtained could be used as a basis to inform other investigations, even if BCG itself may not provide a viable solution as a cure/vaccine due to its rarity.
 
Let's hope your right. It's hard not to get demoralised by these high daily numbers, I sometimes lose track of the bigger picture such as this.

The data in England appears to show there is already a decline (see the post above) so there is light at the end of the tunnel.

EDIT: Fixed link.
 
The first official US death from COVID19 has been moved back 3 weeks to Feb. 6. Maybe those anecdotes of people thinking they might’ve had early have some merit? Though a lot that will just be paranoia and cognitive bias I suppose.

CNN link
 
How can anyone take UK figures seriously when they exclude deaths outside of hospitals?

Even then, a lifting of lockdowns will result in the virus spreading again.

It took 1 person to infect the world, what do you think will happen with thousands carrying the infection in the UK?-
 
I got the BCG in school - was this not standard for most people for many years? Perhaps this was just in NI? I honestly don't know.
 
The first official US death from COVID19 has been moved back 3 weeks to Feb. 6. Maybe those anecdotes of people thinking they might’ve had early have some merit? Though a lot that will just be paranoia and cognitive bias I suppose.

CNN link

In Seattle they've been retrospectively testing a load of blood samples for covid that were collected from people with viral illnesses in December/Jamuary, with absolutely nothing turning up. Which makes sense. Covid has a really different clinical picture to flu, so an ongoing outbreak for a couple of months before the first official cases couldn't have gone under the radar.
 
In Seattle they've been retrospectively testing a load of blood samples for covid that were collected from people with viral illnesses in December/Jamuary, with absolutely nothing turning up. Which makes sense. Covid has a really different clinical picture to flu, so an ongoing outbreak for a couple of months before the first official cases couldn't have gone under the radar.
I was thinking more like February, possible cases before official ones were commonly reported in the area.
 
How can anyone take UK figures seriously when they exclude deaths outside of hospitals?

Even then, a lifting of lockdowns will result in the virus spreading again.

It took 1 person to infect the world, what do you think will happen with thousands carrying the infection in the UK?-

ignoring the actual total, it at least shows that we seem to be at peak and now heading back downwards. it's a good sign. but yes, it's only the beginning still. long way to go over the next 12-24 months.
 
Problem with the daily date of death figures is while we're passed the peak, in the next week(s) they'll be adding more to today, this week and last week and filling in those gaps more, those bars or plots on the graphs will rise. Italy has gone sideways for 17 days at the 400-600 range. We might have a 500-700+ range for the next few weeks and overtake Italy's total. A lot of recent positive tested cases from those ~5.5k a day are yet to unfold.
 
Last edited:
I was thinking more like February, possible cases before official ones were commonly reported in the area.

I guess that’s possible. Also Seattle isn’t representative of the whole of the US! I’d need to dig out the paper to check.

Just talking to friends in hospitals, though, they really don’t buy the idea it’s been around any longer than the official estimate. Young people ending up intensive care from pneumonia - without testing postive for any of the usual respiratory pathogens - is an incredibly unusual thing to happen but is a regular occurrence since the first official cases were reported.
 
I would guess that Oxford people know best about the sort of work they have done and the possible obstacles. All of the others (not directly familiar with the work done) are merely speculating and making educated guesses based on what they think is true regarding the virus.

Once again, I am interested in knowing how can a rando on the internet be certain that there will not be a vaccine ready in 2+ years if there is a team of scientists thinking that it will be in six months? Ok, it genuinely being six months would be too-good-to-be-true news, but how arrogant must you be to write it off outright?

At the same time, we are unsure even regarding basic things, such as the death rate and if one can get reinfected. This is also another reason why opinions difer - no hard data means more room for speculation.
Tbf, there are multiple teams of scientists who think 12-18 months is much more realistic than 6, and even for that, they urge caution. There is also the fact that the vaccines take 10-15 years to be developed.

Oxford’s team is also not the leading team on this. Moderna from Boston is the leader, and they produced a vaccine two months ago (I am not sure that Oxford’s super optimistic team has even developed the vaccine yet), and administered it on humans a month ago or so. The 12-18 months or so delay is more about doing intensive (though somehow rushed) testing, rather than developing the vaccine. There are already multiple vaccines that seem to be working fine.

What Oxford’s team is proposing looks to me to essentially skip the testing. Which can be dangerous for mass vaccinations and it will likely not get the green permit. And to be fair, I think that they have been advocating to start administering it in doctors and medical staff on fall, not on general population.
 
I’m sure there are plenty. There’s actually some real evidence that nicotine might be protective. Zero evidence that THC/CBD protects.

You sure based on what? Show me the numbers.

How many cannabis daily smokers are sick?

Based on Italy (heavy nicotine consumers), I can safely deduce that nicotine does nothing to save you.
 
Something weird happened with the English mortality data. There used to be a single case that was dated to before 1st March, but that's now been removed. Is it possible they'd be updating death certs from February this late on?