It is not clear if that is really the case, or they were just false negatives (essentially tested negative/fully recuperated, but had still the virus inside them). But it is very troubling if it can come back.
Today I got to suspect that Portuguese health authorities are working under the assumption that it takes a few weeks to go from the first case (usually imported) to intracommunity spread. This indeed seems to be the case in a few of the first countries to get hit. And I now start to understand better the timeline of some actions on part of our government (we had the first confirmed cases two days ago).
However, I have a theory that as the disease spreads throughout the world this time will get shorter and shorter in each new affected country. It just seems obvious. Now I need data to back it up or throw it in the bin. Will sort each country by order of the first case and plot it against days until community spread is acknowledged by local authorities.
Out of interest why do you think the period from the first case and intracommunity spread will decrease?
I'm amazed that we have seemingly contained the disease here in Australia with no intracommunity spread so far. Probably just a matter of time of course.
My idea is that as more places become sources of intracommunity spread, more routes of international spread will exist, making the existing measures in place.
I see countries like Spain, France and the UK following a similar pattern. Both started slowly, with a few cases almost always from China and later Northern Italy, and then a recent upsurge in cases and acknowldgement of intracommunity spread.
But now you see a country like Germany, which had their first case much later, but an explosion of cases nearly at the same time as the above three.
Now I look at Portugal's first two patients: One from Italy and one from Valencia. The number of different porential sources increases, perhaps more are appearing at the same time. It seems to make sense that will lead to faster intracommunity spread...
It just seems to me reasonsble to expect Portugal to follow a path that is more akin to Germany rathern than that of the UK and Spain.
In general, alcohol kills most bacteria and some viruses. COVID-19 fortunately is one of them.
Hand washing, done properly, doesn't so much kill as simply remove from your skin any virus or bacteria. Soap kills some, but it's biggest job is removing the adhesive quality of them, allowing you scrub and rinse them off your skin. The net result when properly applied, is more thorough than alcohol and has the added benefit of being much more expansive with regard to all kinds of infections, as it removes dirt where it may hide, spores, etc.
The 'good bacteria' thing is probably true, but there is no studies showing that this has any negative impact. If it worries you, just touch your arm with your hand and voila, bacteria culture restored. Don't know about the bugs thriving on alcohol.
I know this only because I had to study hand hygeine when I studied nursing, and part of that was also examining the results in uv light and petri dishes after cleaning our own hands with alcohol, casual hand wash and proper hand wash. The healthcare professional advisory was that the basis is hand washing, but if you are certain no material contamination has taken place in touching something, then sanitiser can be used for intermittent sterilisation to relieve the skin, as too frequent handwashing every day can take its toll.
The stock markets are important too as every 1% increase on the unemployment rate on an average population of 300m kills around 40 thousand people by other means.Reading the trump nutters on twitter it seems like their biggest priority is ensuring the stock market isnt affected.
Doesnt matter how many people it kills, just as long as the conditions are maintained for Trumps reelection.
Looks like trump is thinking the same with his approach.
Most of them will change their tune quickly. Young people die too, just a lot less. They may, however, generate proportionatelly more coverage, newsploitation, etc.Can almost see parallels with Nazi ideology - who actively went about killing their "weak". Promoting a lack of action on the basis that it's "only them" who will die, you may as well be killing those people.
They'll be up soon when the hospital execution tables all run out.It seems like mass shootings are down because of the virus.
If there's one thing I've learned from all this on a personal level is how incredibly difficult it is to go through a regular work day without touching my face and any surfaces that have been touched by tens of people.
My idea is that as more places become sources of intracommunity spread, more routes of international spread will exist, making the existing measures in place more and more innefective.
I see countries like Spain, France and the UK following a similar pattern. Both started slowly, with a few cases almost always from China and later Northern Italy, and then a recent upsurge in cases and acknowldgement of intracommunity spread.
But now you see a country like Germany, which had their first case much later, but an explosion of cases nearly at the same time as the above three.
Now I look at Portugal's first two patients: One from Italy and one from Valencia. The number of different porential sources increases, perhaps more are appearing at the same time. It seems to make sense that will lead to faster intracommunity spread...
It just seems to me reasonsble to expect Portugal to follow a path that is more akin to Germany rathern than that of the UK and Spain.
The stock markets are important too as every 1% increase on the unemployment rate on an average population of 300m kills around 40 thousand people by other means.
Based on real info. It was from that and I read a lot of stuff based on that movie too.I don’t know if brad Pitts character in the big short is a good source of info
Based on real info. It was from that and I read a lot of stuff based on that movie too.
Exactly right. All I've heard from Trump supporters around me is : Corona virus is nothing to worry about / but what is the stock market doing? I get the not getting too worried about the virus part (I'm definitely the last to think the world is ending in that regard) but for Christ sake I can totally understand why others are freaking out and worried. It just continously amazes me how infatuated some folks are with this president that all they care about is making sure he gets re elected literally without regard for human life.Reading the trump nutters on twitter it seems like their biggest priority is ensuring the stock market isnt affected.
Doesnt matter how many people it kills, just as long as the conditions are maintained for Trumps reelection.
Looks like trump is thinking the same with his approach.
imagine the end of it said "michael barry invests in one commodity now.... hand sanitizer"
It'll sweep through them like the janitor grim reaper in a nursing home considering half of politicians are the wrong side of 60.Weaklings, the lot of our leaders
I know what you mean. If I get it, fine. I'll sit on my arse for a couple of weeks. But there's a big chance that four kids are also going to get it too and that's what worries me.My biggest fear is not me catching it, but it's the fact that those around me catch it and suffer very negatively. It's really sad.
The stock markets are important too as every 1% increase on the unemployment rate on an average population of 300m kills around 40 thousand people by other means.
I know what you mean. If I get it, fine. I'll sit on my arse for a couple of weeks. But there's a big chance that four kids are also going to get it too and that's what worries me.
Am still in Phuket. Not a big deal here at all! Really don't understand the Western hysteria over this.
Anyway, there was a rumour swirling around the hotel I'm staying at that UK Government is considering stopping all international flights in and out of UK for an indefinite period, and that Cabinet was meeting today to decide. I've searched on google and cant find any credible sources stating this.
Anyone in UK know if this is true?
Trump to Hannity on WHO saying coronavirus death rate is 3.4%:
"I think the 3.4% number is really a false number. Now this is just my hunch, but based on a lot of conversations ... personally, I'd say the number is way under 1%."
Astoundingly irresponsible.
It’s literally all he cares aboutReading the trump nutters on twitter it seems like their biggest priority is ensuring the stock market isnt affected.
Doesnt matter how many people it kills, just as long as the conditions are maintained for Trumps reelection.
Looks like trump is thinking the same with his approach.
Really don't understand the Western hysteria over this
Am still in Phuket. Not a big deal here at all! Really don't understand the Western hysteria over this.
Might you be more inclined to help if you, and of course oates, had already had the virus and were probably immune? I know you were a volunteer worker back in England so you have the public spirit in you.I see there's talk about asking retired doctors and nurses to return to help out in the UK. I also see the the Nursing and Midwifery Council have just brought in a much quicker way to return to practice than the previous fairly comprehensive clinical and academic programme that you had to complete, which was several months long - now you can do an online theory test and an OSCE practical.
Cynical me thinks the new arrangements are aimed at combatting the effects of Brexit on the nursing workforce, but I suppose it might help now for nurses who are prepared to return in light of Covid-19. However, I don't think many older, retired doctors and nurses will be rushing back to work in these circumstances.
If we were living in the UK, I certainly wouldn't be volunteering. Retired staff are in the older age group which is at-risk.
Am still in Phuket. Not a big deal here at all! Really don't understand the Western hysteria over this.
Anyway, there was a rumour swirling around the hotel I'm staying at that UK Government is considering stopping all international flights in and out of UK for an indefinite period, and that Cabinet was meeting today to decide. I've searched on google and cant find any credible sources stating this.
Anyone in UK know if this is true?
Might you be more inclined to help if you, and of course oates, had already had the virus and were probably immune? I know you were a volunteer worker back in England so you have the public spirit in you.
It's a question for all of us really, as if the shit hits big style it's not just qualified medical staff like your good self that will be required, it will be cleaners, porters, drivers, cook's assistants and dogsbodies in general. I don't know what I'd do to be honest. I suspect there tends to be a herd mentality with these things, like going to war, and individuals get swept up in the general will.
Governments will need to change, and soon. Without doubt.
If you've ever read about Empires / Super-Powers crumbling, you'd be well aware that there are now numerous signs that realistically we're entering into such a period.
Actually caring about their public and putting that at least near the top of priority - re-prioritizing Health care is a must
Transparency as the social media era moves faster than Governmental campaigns can
Environmental issues need to overtake old economic systems
That's just my opinion.
What changes would you like to see, if any?