SARS CoV-2 coronavirus / Covid-19 (No tin foil hat silliness please)

Even then, should it still be spreading so much so late into a full quarantine? If everyone fled South on the 8th March?
Easily, yeah, when you take into account the incubation period. Someone may get it and then it takes up to a couple of weeks for them to be ill and pass it to the next person and so on and so on.
 
Had this been posted? Satellite photo showing air pollution levels in Europe (from February)

italy-smog.png
This didn't really tell me much to be honest.
What do we compare it to?
 
@Revan the updated figures for tests in France. On April 5th hospitals labs had done 274409 tests and on April 7th 59398 tests were done in private labs, so at least 333807 tests were done on April 7th. Currently around 20k tests are done in hospitals and 5k-6k in private labs, daily.
 
@Revan the updated figures for tests in France. On April 5th hospitals labs had done 274409 tests and on April 7th 59398 tests were done in private labs, so at least 333807 tests were done on April 7th. Currently around 20k tests are done in hospitals and 5k-6k in private labs, daily.
Ok, better than before, though I still think that 25k is really low at this stage.
 
This didn't really tell me much to be honest.
What do we compare it to?

I think the point is that places that have high air pollution are also the places being hardest hit. So maybe people’s respiratory systems are weaker there.
 
I think the point is that places that have high air pollution are also the places being hardest hit. So maybe people’s respiratory systems are weaker there.
Right, that makes sense, I suppose. I thought it was one of those pictures showing how little air pollution we have after the outbreak.
 
Cheers, but 2.5% random people were infected right there and then, so likely the percentage who "have" been infected was much much higher right? Even a fair amount the 97.5% of negative people in the study may have had the virus, just weren't bearing it then.

That's what hopefully tomorrow will tell us once they've put that into the model.
Depends how long the test can detect infected people. Let's say it is 14 days. If doubling time in Stockholm in March was around 4 days, it gives us 2^(14/4)=11. So it should be missing only 2.5%/11=0.23% of the cases. Which would mean less than 10% of the 2,5% of the people had had it and recovered so they are not detected in the test. So it doesn't change almost at all.

Edit: I am saying it in a silly way that should be added to the 2.5%, so 2,73% would have had it before or have it during study.
 
Last edited:
Cheers, but 2.5% random people were infected right there and then, so likely the percentage who "have" been infected was much much higher right? Even a fair amount the 97.5% of negative people in the study may have had the virus, just weren't bearing it then.

That's what hopefully tomorrow will tell us once they've put that into the model.
Probably not. With an exponential increase in the number of cases, you can bet that the vast majority of the infected are infected right now (not infected and then healed). That 2.5% might go to 3% or so, but not much more than that IMO.
 
Ok, better than before, though I still think that 25k is really low at this stage.

That's pretty much what South Korea were doing when everyone was praising them. Now of course that's not the goal but to call it really low is a bit ridiculous.
 
I think the point is that places that have high air pollution are also the places being hardest hit. So maybe people’s respiratory systems are weaker there.
But we already have reasons why northern Italy was hit hard early. The picture needs more context and a legend (and source).
 
That's pretty much what South Korea were doing when everyone was praising them. Now of course that's not the goal but to call it really low is a bit ridiculous.
With the increase on infections, also the testing should increase. France now per capita is doing the same as the US (which is blamed for not doing enough testings). Of course much better than the UK, but for example, far worse than Germany (who is trying to increase it from 80k to 200-300k per day).
 
Depends how long the test can detect infected people. Let's say it is 14 days. If doubling time in Stockholm in March was around 4 days, it gives us 2^(14/4)=11. So it should be missing only 2.5%/11=0.23% of the cases. Which would mean less than 10% of the 2,5% of the people had had it and recovered so they are not detected in the test. So it doesn't change almost at all.
Probably not. With an exponential increase in the number of cases, you can bet that the vast majority of the infected are infected right now (not infected and then healed). That 2.5% might go to 3% or so, but not much more than that IMO.

5 days according to Tegnell today.

We’ll see tomorrow, I suspect it’ll be a lot higher.

Anyone in the test group infected for example between 1st March - approx 20th March would have shown as negative.
 
But is 5 days today or 3-4 weeks ago? Anyway doesn't change much. If 2.5% is correct (it had confidence levels from 1.4%-4.2%) the "real" total amount is at most 3% as @Revan said

The test isn’t an antibody test, no-one has an approved one yet.

The test can see if any of the test group were bearing the virus when the took the test, and Tegnell said that will likely be a window of 5 days.

Although yeah, I get that you can take from that that 2.5% of Stockholm had the virus during those dates. I get your maths and Revan’s input now.
 
Last edited:
With the increase on infections, also the testing should increase. France now per capita is doing the same as the US (which is blamed for not doing enough testings). Of course much better than the UK, but for example, far worse than Germany (who is trying to increase it from 80k to 200-300k per day).

But it's not really low, you have been using South Korea has an example every day and now you make that type of claim. I can accept the argument that they need to continue increasing daily tests which is exactly what they are doing but you can't go around claiming that it's really low when it's not, particularly when the country that has been used as a reference didn't test a lot more.

Anyway, it's not the goal, veterinary labs have been given the authorisation to help increase the testing capabilities, the only issue at the moment is that people don't go to labs, something may have to be done about it.
 
The test isn’t an antibody test, no-one has an approved one yet.

The test can see if any of the test group were bearing the virus when the took the test, and Tegnell said that will likely be a window of 5 days.
Thought you meant doubling time. 5 days to show it on test can not be correct. People have symptoms a lot longer even in some of the milder cases.

Hmm, maybe on average, if asymptomatic people "recover" in 1-3 days. So if the test really is that bad, it would indeed double it to 5% and bring the death rate down accordingly.
 
Last edited:
BBC
England reports 765 new coronavirus deaths
NHS England has recorded 765 new deaths in hospital from coronavirus.
It said that 140 of them occurred yesterday, while 568 took place between 1 April and 7 April.
The remaining 57 deaths took place in March, including two on 19 March and one on 16 March

My make the numbers seem better but this could go for any released daily figures in Europe

It doesn't make the numbers seem better? The delay is deaths is in the systems used to report
Why would Northern Italy be giving off the most pollution? I obviously know that it’s been a badly hit area but can’t see the correlatio, unless they’re taking no notice of any curfew?
You wouldn't naturally associate Northern Italy with heavy industry perhaps? I don't have much to go on but I do know that quite a bit of train manufacturing takes place in that area.
 
Thought you meant doubling time. 5 days to show it on test can not be correct. People have symptoms a lot longer even in some of the milder cases.

Hmm, maybe on average, if asymptomatic people "recover" in 1-3 days. So if the test really is that bad, it would indeed double it to 5% and bring the death rate down accordingly.

Only passing on what was said in presser:

Anders Tegnell poängterar dock att viruset finns kvar hos personer i omkring fem dagar och att viruset spridits i huvudstaden i över en månads tid.

(Sure you get the above but for the rest).

Anders Tegnell makes the point however that the virus exists in the person for approximately 5 days and that the virus was in the capital for over a month.
 
Only passing on what was said in presser:

Anders Tegnell poängterar dock att viruset finns kvar hos personer i omkring fem dagar och att viruset spridits i huvudstaden i över en månads tid.

(Sure you get the above but for the rest).

Anders Tegnell makes the point that the virus exists in the person for approximately 5 days and that the virus was in the capital for over a month.
Thanks, well that's good news. So I would revise my death rate to around 0.5%
 
With 65k confirmed cases, where do we reckon we're at in reality.... 10x that, maybe 20x by now?
Doesn't even scratch the surface in reality
 
South African lockdown as just been extend by another 2 weeks (from the original 3 weeks). So we’re in here for 5 weeks in total (for now), until end April.

Average daily increase in cases before lockdown 42% (1,100 cases at lockdown) to 4% daily increase in cases for the past 2 weeks (1,900 or so cases, roughly).
 
A doctor who was a good friend of my uncle and sister (also a doc) died in UK today from covid19, picked up on the front line.
Ironically and tragically, he wrote to PM 3 weeks ago, desperately asking for more PPE



uChXEMH.jpg
 
Last edited:
My whole street was out then clapping and there was quite a few fireworks going off in the distance too.
 
I think some of those things can open. Pubs, Cinema's, Gyms can open as long as there is strict enforcement of the number of people in them & carefully management of crowds gathering outside. Maybe you'll have to make a booking to go into a pub or gym (so you don't queue up outside), limit group sizes etc.

Cant see gyms opening soon at all, given the heavy breathing and multiple surface touching that goes on in a work out.
 
A doctor who was a good friend of my uncle and my sister (also a doc) died in UK today from covid19, picked up on the front line.
Ironically and tragically, he wrote to PM 3 weeks after asking for more PPE



92641728_1310050236049335_3838482731373690880_n.jpg


His kids have literally been on Sky News just now. 11 year old daughter speaking about him, absolutely heartbreaking