What would be the problem with them (except taking a month or so to arrive)?They have loads of masks on AliExpress but who would risk buying from China?
Well they did. And they did it to stop mass hoarding of a very limited supply at the time.I'm not having that. Official misinformation to the public is a great hazard.
You do NOT communicate in a disaster the following:
- Masks don't work
- Masks work, but only for HCW's
https://khn.org/morning-breakout/ho...-obamas-team-eerily-mirrors-current-outbreak/Trump blames Obama for lack of pandemic prep
Pressed by a reporter over why the US was not more prepared for the pandemic, Mr Trump blamed the Obama administration, saying "the shelves were empty, we had no ammunition or medical supplies".
He also claimed he inherited "broken" tests, though it is unclear what he meant as the previous administration would not have developed such tests.
"I always knew that pandemics are one of the worst things that could happen," Mr Trump said.
This guy
What would be the problem with them (except taking a month or so to arrive)?
They don't meet quality standards.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020...ive-masks-imported-china-200329141715106.html
There have been loads of returns.
Masks shipped by containers also have a high risk of spreading the disease as there are some reports that the virus can stay there for 17 days and usually masks arrive quicker.
Yeah I was going to say historically and was thinking more Beijing and Shanghai tbh. Apart from the white out ruining your photos at Victoria Peak in Hong Kong, never had any particular pollution issues in Asia.These days, cities like Tokyo, Seoul, Bangkok or Kuala Lumpar don't have the pollution levels of China or India/Sub Continent.
In a sense, smog, SARS, covid19 etc are one of the same thing: external pollutants that make you ill. I guess mask wearing across Asia is something that hss happened for various reasons over a period of time.
But as pointed out by many, it's now become an educated and culturally acceptable solution. I've even saw fashionable hipster types wearing 'designer' masks, which complimented their clothing style on my most recent trip!
This region need education and liberation, badly. More badly than a corona virus patient needs ventilator. People living and spending their entire lives on the footpaths of Mumbai. Lack of civic facilities, food....Its like a ticking time bomb.Didn't India have the most casualties during the spanish flu? I dread to think what could happen if this gets out of hand this time. It could be an absolute catastrophe. I know it already is in a sense but it could get so so much worse. Also I agree with the rest of your post, you seem to be more in the know in regards to india than me. I just seen the video on BBC and I was absolutely appalled. According to the bbc it was due to the stigma of potentially being infected so that's why I said fear but I'll take your word for it.
So, how much do we think that China and Iran are lying about the number of infections/deaths? I assume that China is lying a lot, while Iran is totally lying.
Yes, but it is yet to be proven how much time the virus can survive on surfaces and especially damp and wet ones. It is still very early to conclude how much days/hours it lives there and generally many countries have blocked the import of goods from China.
A lifetime of the best food, living conditions and healthcare that money can buy will likely mean he's in a far better condition to fight off a virus than the average person his age. Up my way you'd be hard pressed to find a guy his age whose working life didn't involve a few lungfuls of coal dust or asbestos.
I was told that the test betweent the real proper mask and the fake ones is the burn test. Lighter will do.I'm sure the ones made of cloth can. The hospital style ones which seem to be made out of something a bit papery probably can't.
The county my wife works in has the 3rd most ICU beds in the state and her hospital system has had to convert whole pediatric and medical surgical wings into extensions of the ICU.
Trump blames Obama for lack of pandemic prep
Pressed by a reporter over why the US was not more prepared for the pandemic, Mr Trump blamed the Obama administration, saying "the shelves were empty, we had no ammunition or medical supplies".
He also claimed he inherited "broken" tests, though it is unclear what he meant as the previous administration would not have developed such tests.
"I always knew that pandemics are one of the worst things that could happen," Mr Trump said.
This guy
#MaskWars - war within the war.
It’s playing out exactly like movie ‘Contagion’ scripted it would.
That is absolute and utter tripe mate. I'm sorry but it is.
There are many types of masks on the market and most of them do feck all to protect you as they do not stop you inhaling droplets with the virus.
Are you a doctor? What is the scientific proof that masks protects you? Why the WHO doesn't recommend healthy persons to wear masks?
Masks with zero certifications, zero knowledge how they are made and if the person that made them is infected or not are sold on the market.
You have the Netherlands moving back millions of masks that were proven to do feck all and sent it back to China.
You might as well put your hand on your mouth when you cough and it will do the same job as 90% of the masks out there.
All people touch their face much more often with masks on, because they have to either correct it, take it off, take it on, change it (most of the masks only last for an hour or two) and that builds bacteria and viruses right on their faces.
17 seems a bit too much. To be fair, it could be and there are many unknowns, but from what I have seen the consensus seems to be that it can survive from a few hours to a few days (in metal). Masks are already inside a package, and I believe in packages the virus doesn't survive that long.They don't meet quality standards.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020...ive-masks-imported-china-200329141715106.html
There have been loads of returns.
Masks shipped by containers also have a high risk of spreading the disease as there are some reports that the virus can stay there for 17 days and usually masks arrive quicker.
They are having circa 100 deaths per day (and only 3.3k in total) which is kind of unbelievable. They were hit very early and very hard, some of their high level officials die (which probably means that it was very spread), they have the same population as Germany, are in relative poverty, have large families, yet somehow their deaths lag behind Italy/Spain/France/UK. Looks kind of fishy.Dunno about China, but I don’t think Iranian authorities are necessarily lying, just they’ve been so completely overwhelmed by what’s happened that they are really struggling to get a grasp of the true magnitude of their crisis.
Btw I think what’s happened in certain other countries since the virus exploded across Iran provides a good perspective on the nature of the Iranian approach. Many people who were a bit shocked by Tehran’s seemingly bungled initial response might be feeling a bit chastened by subsequent developments elsewhere (I include myself in that).
I don't need to be a doctor to figure out that masks might work to stop the spread of a disease transmitted in part by coughing. No mask is 100% safe (unless we're talking about lab grade masks) but anything that stops or can lower the viral load is beneficial.
Since you asked for studies, here are some:
Three commonly available face masks—a surgical mask, a pre-shaped mask, and a bandana—were challenged with saline aerosols in concentrations and particle size distributions representing dust storm conditions to determine their protective efficiencies. A N95 respirator was used as the positive control and challenged under the same conditions. All three masks performed poorly, with protective efficiencies less than 34% as compared to the N95 respirator that had a protective efficiency of nearly 90%. Possible factors related to the protective efficiencies observed with face masks and the N95 respirator includes the penetration efficiency and particle load characteristics of the fabrication materials. Equally important is the fit of the face mask and respirator. This may account for the less than 95% efficiency observed for the N95. Protection from dust, allergens, and infectious aerosols with face masks and respirators is dependent on the aerosol concentration of the compound and the in-fectious or inhaled dose. The results demonstrate that use of these types of face masks may not provide as much protection as desired against inhaled aerosols.
On deaths, also behind UK and France. And deaths is a better stat than infections considering the difference in testings (the US tests in a day as much as UK has tested in total).Fecking hell, 30.000 new cases and 1.300 dead today in the US. How much has this damned virus been bubbling under the surface over there? Ok, per capita they're still behind Italy and Spain, but this does not look promising.
There are many conflicting reports, but so far no one has come out with definite evidence of how long in can live on metal and damp surfaces as we don't have that many tests and information.17 seems a bit too much. To be fair, it could be and there are many unknowns, but from what I have seen the consensus seems to be that it can survive from a few hours to a few days (in metal). Masks are already inside a package, and I believe in packages the virus doesn't survive that long.
Fair point about defective masks.
On deaths, also behind UK and France. And deaths is a better stat than infections considering the difference in testings (the US tests in a day as much as UK has tested in total).
It does not look good though, especially with some states who are still relatively untouched and are going to be hell in a few weeks. It will be quite interesting here, the peak will last far longer than in European countries, primarily cause different states will peak very differently (for example, when Florida will peak, New York will have passed the worst).
Me eitherI don’t think he’s even noticed.
Dunno about China, but I don’t think Iranian authorities are necessarily lying, just they’ve been so completely overwhelmed by what’s happened that they are really struggling to get a grasp of the true magnitude of their crisis.
Btw I think what’s happened in certain other countries since the virus exploded across Iran provides a good perspective on the nature of the Iranian approach. Many people who were a bit shocked by Tehran’s seemingly bungled initial response might be feeling a bit chastened by subsequent developments elsewhere (I include myself in that).
You definitely took some time to come up with that, but neither of those is a proper study.This is a study:
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/153567601001500204
Some of the masks during those tests show less than 5-10% efficiency which means they do close to feck all.
So when you try to spread false information and 'sense of security' of the effect of wearing masks, I suggest you try to dig up a bit deeper on the subject.
She's said they've had people transferred in from there before. Wouldn't surprise me.Most of eastern and western NC will have to go to Greenville
Hopefully they'll tell us how they did it. Them folks at Duke are smart.At least there's been a delay in cases flooding into hospitals in the non-NY/La/WA/MI states. It gives them time to prepare and convert/expand treatment areas. Duke was able to figure out ways to sterilize N95 masks for reuse.
To be fair, 33% is hardly anything, especially if most people are wearing them. 1/3 of those who wear them not getting infected is a big deal, especially considering the spread of the virus (so not infected, do not spread the virus). Additionally, with a large part (maybe up to a few times of people diagnosed) showing no symptoms or just mild symptoms, if those people wear masks, then they won't infect the others.You definitely took some time to come up with that, but neither of those is a proper study.
This is a study:
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/153567601001500204
Some of the masks during those tests show less than 5-10% efficiency which means they do close to feck all.
So when you try to spread false information and 'sense of security' of the effect of wearing masks, I suggest you try to dig up a bit deeper on the subject.
I wouldn't even entertain that. If you have something constructive to say, backed with some evidence I'm perfectly fine with hearing you out.
Pure common sense says that in addition to handwashing with soap and physical distancing, wearing a face mask will help reduce chances of covid19 infection, IF properly used.
Thats enough for me, and most others who spend time thinking about it. However, you're welcome to continue your copy/paste 'peer review' war with @Suedesi, I just think it's a waste of your time.
If you don't want to wear one, don't. Nobody will force you: It's not even mandatory law, even in mask wearing cultures like Japan or S.Korea. Good luck!
Fair points. Like you, I do not trust China's numbers and that they have contained it.There are many conflicting reports, but so far no one has come out with definite evidence of how long in can live on metal and damp surfaces as we don't have that many tests and information.
By the look of it China has contained it and not many reports of newly registered cases (however I'd take that with a pinch of salt) and whilst the risk of contamination of the products might be really low(or maybe non-existent) the quality control is very poor, especially when you consider the high demand and the little to no time those masks needs to be manufactured, sealed and shipped.
Generally it's advisable to buy masks that are imported from the government at batches so if they are crap you at least can regulate and stop the distribution right away, rather than buy it from unknown sources and distribute it to friends/family, etc.
Surely that works to their advantage? It'll give them an opportunity to re-direct & focus resources on the places that need them the most.
On deaths, also behind UK and France. And deaths is a better stat than infections considering the difference in testings (the US tests in a day as much as UK has tested in total).
It does not look good though, especially with some states who are still relatively untouched and are going to be hell in a few weeks. It will be quite interesting here, the peak will last far longer than in European countries, primarily cause different states will peak very differently (for example, when Florida will peak, New York will have passed the worst).
I know I shouldn't but this made meYes, according to the Noggie middle eastern correspondent who's regularly been in touch with the local doctors, they only have so many testing kits to make positive confirmations of the cases, that they have no chance of giving a correct number. After hiding the outbreak before the February elections, people apparently didn't really believe the authorities when they actually came clean with the impending virus threat, and so the virus was able to grab a foothold.
Looking ahead, could this catastrophe turn Iran into a slightly less pronounced theocracy? I mean, the country has a pretty well-educated portion of secular minds, and the religious nutters seem intent on self-extinction by licking corona-infested religious artifacts, so the aftermath might be the right moment to bridge some gaps between Iran and the western world.
Is this a joke?Hello neighbour!!!!
As I said usually I hate a trip to Tesco’s but the last couple have been great.
Still no flour, no eggs no rice (apart from a 10kg bag and I’m not that desperate for rice!) and no pasta but everything else was fine. I have little hope that people around here will pull together as the things I have seen in there (including some
Guy wandering around with an axe!!) beggar belief and really make you question humanity.
Half price joints of beef atm though so I bought 2.5 kg worth and I plan on inviting some like minded affluent friends round on Sunday for a good roast.
(Is that getting old yet?)
Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't a lot also depends on how much virus you get contaminated (thus why many relatively young doctors and nurses have died). I think I read somewhere (and it was kind of shocking for me), that if you get infected with more virus, then it is harder for the immune system to fight the virus, cause it needs to fight many particles of virus at the same time (essentially the virus has a headstart). if true, it can explain why doctors are dying so much. A random guy inhaling some particles which are contaminated would have a better response than a doctor to whom people have been coughing in their face for days.Distancing, washing your hands and not touching your face, eyes, nose is perfectly fine for anyone.
If you inhale even one tiny droplet you can be infected with the virus. Some of the high quality masks have much better effect at reducing the chance of an infection, but a very small percentage of people are wearing them.
You are free to wear one yourself of course, and that's a personal choice, but people should be aware of the negative effects of masks and that it also builds bacteria and you might come in contact with another virus/bacteria whilst you wear them.
IF properly used is a big if, because most of the people that I see every day - don't.
Masks are useful in heavy polluted areas (such as China, Japan, Italy) because they stop dust, allergens and the big particles that you inhale daily, but so far I haven't seen a study that says wearing one will not get you infected with the virus.
This is horrible to see. Need more awareness in India. I realise this barbaric behaviour is driven by fear but still..
To be fair, 33% is hardly anything, especially if most people are wearing them. 1/3 of those who wear them not getting infected is a big deal, especially considering the spread of the virus (so not infected, do not spread the virus). Additionally, with a large part (maybe up to a few times of people diagnosed) showing no symptoms or just mild symptoms, if those people wear masks, then they won't infect the others.
Finally, the experiment was done when the mannequin was bombed with dust of contagious particles for half an hour. In many scenarios, like working, or going to supermarket/pharmacy, you are still keeping social distance and probably staying less than 30 minutes, which might mean that those masks offer more than 33% protection.
So, I would say that it is a good idea to save the respirators for medical staff, and make mandatory for everyone else to wear surgical masks (which offer less protection, but are cheaper and easier to produce).