Suedesi
Full Member
Always amazed me that Northern Italy is used as a reference scenario to what would happen in the US. I've lived in Brescia a few years ago, and I know for a fact that roughly 1 in 3 adults still live with their parents, which makes them extremely vulnerable. Spain/Portugal may be similar, some of the Eastern European countries also. I doubt Germany, most of the UK, the Nordic/Baltic countries fall in the same category. And that's categorically, not the case in the US.
Secondly, the air pollution in Northern Italy is terrible and according to WHO estimates (if you believe their science - because they're nimrods) it causes 8,000 deaths annually.
In addition, air pollution greatly increases the risk of viral lung diseases in elderly people (you can also check European Environment Agency data for Italy here). So don't think you can apply that uniformly to the US (maybe LA could be vulnerable?).
Finally the US significantly better equipped than Italy in terms of intensive care units – by a factor of about 3.
So I think that Italy/Spain or New York City for that matter (which is the most densely populated city in the US) are not realistic scenarios for the US.
Secondly, the air pollution in Northern Italy is terrible and according to WHO estimates (if you believe their science - because they're nimrods) it causes 8,000 deaths annually.
In addition, air pollution greatly increases the risk of viral lung diseases in elderly people (you can also check European Environment Agency data for Italy here). So don't think you can apply that uniformly to the US (maybe LA could be vulnerable?).
Finally the US significantly better equipped than Italy in terms of intensive care units – by a factor of about 3.
So I think that Italy/Spain or New York City for that matter (which is the most densely populated city in the US) are not realistic scenarios for the US.