It's relative. The streets are extremely quiet but you do notice the same few people walking up and down multiple times per day with the same shopping bag in their hand.
https://www.rte.ie/news/coronavirus/2020/0331/1127572-covid-19-belgium-girl-death/You enjoy your scare mongering.
Was the child healthy first of all? Any previous conditions? What’s the details? Or you could just keep posting click bait shock like posts to get your point across
It’s not talked about enough, but the US already had a serious ‘death by despair’ problem lingering before all of this.All of those. Long term people left without jobs or income who were already near the mark.
Short term, people struggling to get basic needs such as food. People not getting basic care and being forced to stay indoors or self isolate. People dying of other illnesses or conditions which could be due to a lack of care or lack of regular activity, or mental stress caused by any of the thousands of things a lockdown affects. Relationships put under strain, etc.
It really does add up very quickly, and this is a more extreme circumstance that we've seen before. If the government haven't considered it at all then it's very likely to overshadow the virus itself in the medium and long term.
ChillIts very easy to translate. Don't start getting pissy or you can do one.
People seem to underestimate just how globalised the world is. Such an extreme economic collapse will literally affect every industry and sector. The struggle for resources will be immense and social unrest will rise to very dangerous levels.All of those. Long term people left without jobs or income who were already near the mark.
Short term, people struggling to get basic needs such as food. People not getting basic care and being forced to stay indoors or self isolate. People dying of other illnesses or conditions which could be due to a lack of care or lack of regular activity, or mental stress caused by any of the thousands of things a lockdown affects. Relationships put under strain, etc.
It really does add up very quickly, and this is a more extreme circumstance that we've seen before. If the government haven't considered it at all then it's very likely to overshadow the virus itself in the medium and long term.
As far as I know these models usually ignore that there would be a recession anyway, if the virus ran through the world without strict measures taken against it. It's not like people would continue to work and shop as before while thousands of people are dying around them. You also can't just leave the suffering people alone and ignore them. They would overwhelm the hospitals in a completely uncontroled way. Worst case is that you let hundreds of thousands of people die and run into a massive recession anyway, that'll cost even more lifes on top of it.Just caught the end of a segment on LBC that said the government hasn't done any modeling as to at what point the measures against coronavirus would cause a greater loss of life than coronavirus itself.
It said that modelling suggests the 2008 recession cost more days of life than coronavirus would have with no government counter measures whatsoever.
I'd like to see the statistics because intuitively to me it feels like if the measures are maintained for a few more weeks the economic effect on life will be worse than the virus would've been.
Yep I've been saying this since the start (or at least saying it should be an important consideration) but it actually seems to make people quite angry.
You also have to account for the fact there are millions in this country already living in poverty and with high levels of stress on their mental and physical wellbeing...and a lot of those have now had their income taken away.
I think realistically you're only looking at about 2 weeks before it's a very big problem.
I've not seen the trolley problem incorporate a U-turn before, so that everyone dies anyway...
Still a bit puzzling to me the hypertension one. Some governments, including the UK don't even list it as a risk factor as far as I can remember and other do. I am a bit suspicious that it's potentially blood pressure medication causing something here. Pure speculation though.
Just caught the end of a segment on LBC that said the government hasn't done any modeling as to at what point the measures against coronavirus would cause a greater loss of life than coronavirus itself.
It said that modelling suggests the 2008 recession cost more days of life than coronavirus would have with no government counter measures whatsoever.
I'd like to see the statistics because intuitively to me it feels like if the measures are maintained for a few more weeks the economic effect on life will be worse than the virus would've been.
That the circular track is a really good representation of how difficult it is to find a solution to the crisis we're in.
Fair enough. Guess I got caught up after reading a build up of posts (not same poster)https://www.rte.ie/news/coronavirus/2020/0331/1127572-covid-19-belgium-girl-death/
Lay of the chap a bit, it’s a bit OTT reaction
Exactly. Its not a direct comparison that can be madeAs far as I know these models usually ignore that there would be a recession anyway, if the virus ran through the world without strict measures taken against it. It's not like people would continue to work and shop as before while thousands of people are dying around them. You also can't just leave the suffering people alone and ignore them. They would overwhelm the hospitals in a completely uncontroled way. Worst case is that you let hundreds of thousands of people die and run into a massive recession anyway, that'll cost even more lifes on top of it.
Look at the video from the asian-american doctor in the stickied info thread. It tells you how the virus kills and why hypertension matters.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/alanoh...s-fight-ahead-of-tesla-alliance/#1b3ed79d4591
Medtronic Gives Away Ventilator Design Specs In Coronavirus Fight, Ahead Of Tesla Alliance
Excellent news.
I've just watched the bit about the ACE receptor. The virus targets this receptor but I'm still not sure why high blood pressure matters...unless the receptor being more active simply means it can be targeted more easily? Not got a medical background so bit out of my depth!!
The theory is that certain drugs cause more ACE receptors to be expressed inside our airways because they work by inhibiting the natural enzyme that binds to them (they’re called ACE inhibitors and are used to treat high blood pressure). Which gives more targets for the virus to bind to. Which causes a greater viral load and a worse outcome. It’s just a theory though. Not proven. There are also theories that these same drugs might actually improve outcomes.
Was it not always a when?One of the nurses in my wife's ICU has tested positive.
I guess now it isn't an if, but a when I'm wrecked right now
And this from California, translated from La Repubblica:19 year old with no underlining health problem dies in the U.K.
12 year old with no underlining health problem dies in Belgium.
I’m starting to think this depends on how bad you get it and it can kill anyone
The 17-year-old boy who died in California a few days ago from coronavirus had been rejected by the hospital because he had no health insurance. This was reported by R. Rex Parris, the mayor of Lancaster, the town in California where the teenager died, using the case to invite everyone to stay home. "He was healthy on Friday before he died, he died on Wednesday," Parris said: "He didn't have health insurance and they didn't cure him."
The theory is that certain drugs cause more ACE receptors to be expressed inside our airways because they work by inhibiting the natural enzyme that binds to them (they’re called ACE inhibitors and are used to treat high blood pressure). Which gives more targets for the virus to bind to. Which causes a greater viral load and a worse outcome. It’s just a theory though. Not proven. There are also theories that these same drugs might actually improve outcomes.
Well shit man, I'd like to think my wife's PPE would protect her. But thanks. I failed to realize the fecking housekeeping lady was Typhoid Mary.Was it not always a when?
I noticed a lot more dog walkers too last week, but today there seemed to be fewer, some must have remembered they don't particularly enjoy it. Same on a really sunny day, I see lots of dog people out who you just never see the rest of the time. Shame for the dogs really.I went for a run the other day at my usual time and there were at least 10 times as many people out walking their dogs, and that's no exaggeration. They are literally only out walking their dog BECAUSE they've been told not to go out unless it's essential.
I wouldn't say it was doing any harm except there were so many of them it was actually impossible for everyone to stay 2 metres apart.
Which comes back to me thinking that a majority of the deaths this whole thing will cause either directly or indirectly, will have a factor of stupidity involved.
It all feels like a movie to be fair. I still keep thinking it's really just a bad dream and we are going to wake up from it soon.It's crazy how everyone is guessing at the moment. It really is like a disaster movie with the harried scientists.
Just caught the end of a segment on LBC that said the government hasn't done any modeling as to at what point the measures against coronavirus would cause a greater loss of life than coronavirus itself.
It said that modelling suggests the 2008 recession cost more days of life than coronavirus would have with no government counter measures whatsoever.
I'd like to see the statistics because intuitively to me it feels like if the measures are maintained for a few more weeks the economic effect on life will be worse than the virus would've been.
Probably keep it until this happens again...What do you do with a ventilator when it stops being a ventilator?
There will be a world wide glut of the things when this is all over, maybe Dyson are designing one that converts into a carpet cleaner when its ventilating days are done?
Am I the only one who has no problem with the police going overboard with enforcing the lockdown?
The media are now going after the police, saying it's heavy handed to clamp down on people driving to remote locations for exercise. It has even lead to the government to tell the police not to be so heavy handed.
As far as I'm concerned, the cops can't be heavy handed enough. People have behaved like idiots. Telling the police to back down and let people carry on being idiots sends the wrong message.
Better to have them and not need them than to need them and not have them.What do you do with a ventilator when it stops being a ventilator?
There will be a world wide glut of the things when this is all over, maybe Dyson are designing one that converts into a carpet cleaner when its ventilating days are done?