I think that's the case everywhere now tbh. You can tell by the number of officials, celebs, sportspeople coming out positive now that the figures everyone is reporting are not worth the paper they are written on. All that will matter when all the dust has cleared is how many have died. Not just from Covid19 directly but also from the fallout of it.
No further deaths reported though? 10 is still very low compared to other countries.
No further deaths reported though? 10 is still very low compared to other countries.
Trump just met with him, shook hands etc. The pressure to get him tested will be immense now.
Bolsonaro is someone worthy of it, to be honest. Don't care how un-PC that comes across. If Trump has it, jesus. They would NEVER tell us I reckon.
No further deaths reported though? 10 is still very low compared to other countries.
798 cases in the UK, +208 cases. 30% rise for the second day in a row.
Welcome to the party, i guess.
798 cases in the UK, +208 cases. 30% rise for the second day in a row.
Welcome to the party, i guess.
3597 tested, for 208 cases = 5.7% infection per test. Down from 6.1% yesterday.
They have stopped testing now sure, if you think you have it simply isolate yourself.
Can we call it off in retrospect.............
Sorry, I'll reword it.
So I am assuming that most people that become infected are infected at a single point in time or at least in a short period of time by a single person or handful of people :- They will likely be infected by the virus in a particular point in its evolutionary life cycle and hopefully overcome it.
Front line medics on the other hand are likely to come into contact with literally thousands of infected people over a much longer time frame :- They are likely to see greater variety in the virus as it mutates from person to person, in some cases it might be more harmless and in others it could have mutated in a particularly nasty way or in a way that has evolved to overcome the natural immunity the medic has developed.
Is this logical/biologically viable? Essentially does immunity generally protect from the virus when in place or can a virus mutate in such a way/rate that continual exposure over a length of time to a wide variety of carriers increase the risk of a critical infection?
Given official government policy is that they are not testing anyone, and they specifically do not want to know if you have the symptoms at home, these numbers are worthless.
They have stopped testing now sure, if you think you have it simply isolate yourself.
Use yours and answer the fecking question if you're gonna bother wading in.
Respected Health officials the Globe over are criticizing the Tory Governments heel dragging, particularly over schools.
Repeating the same blurb that you've heard some fat conman peddling on TV isn't answering the question - it's paying lip-service, so save the bother if that's all you're willing to do.
Covering your cough with the fold of your arm is better than spitting into your hand.I'm really out of touch when it comes to these things, I get that it's an efficient way to expose people to the WHO link but I still roll my eyes when I read #dab.
If Trump has it, jesus.
For increasing health awareness?What a fecking knob this guy is. Get out of our club.
Is that the case? Not read that anywhere. Surely that will under-report the figures massively over the coming week? Makes sense I guess from the point of not overwhelming hospitals, but then you're not really tracing anyone and you're allowing it to spread everywhere, which'll be damaging especially for the older population.
What a fecking knob this guy is. Get out of our club.
the reason why China doesn't have a problem having enough darecare and nannies is the same reason as they can build a hospital in a week. you can't compare like for like.
if you ban schools, where are all those kids going? tell me. and don't say their grandparents. the schools will be shut down, don't worry. just not yet. it's pretty simple.
Ok. I think I understand the question. And the answer is “no”. The reason healthcare workers are more likely to be more sick is most likely about viral load. In animal models, the higher the initial infective dose of most viruses the worse the outcome. There’s an assumption that the same is true for doctors/nurses infected in hospitals.
Is this confirmed? Absurd if true.
For increasing health awareness?
Wales Scotland off. Gutted, literally just arrived in Wales for it and would have been my first rugby match.
However I know it's for the best.
What a fecking knob this guy is. Get out of our club.
Dabbing?
Yea what a fecking wanker using his profile to raise awareness of good hygiene practice.
The government guidelines are not to run your business or organisation in an inflexible manner. We are following government guidelines to keep out organisation fully operational, whilst also encouraging staff to consider more home working and conducting meetings remotely. This is not remotely contradictory with the official guidance published.They are -LITERALLY- following government guidelines.
Would the economic down fall have been as great if we just closed off China when this all began? And instead focussed resources on helping them? Scientific models would have predicted a worldwide outbreak nonetheless unless it was kept inside the boundaries of the country it originated from.
Dabbing?