Not sure about that. When you see the same countries getting absolutely hammered twice (while others deal with both waves better) you have to think what’s going on is more than just bad luck. Lessons not being learned anyway.
SARS CoV-2 coronavirus / Covid-19 (No tin foil hat silliness please)
- Thread starter Don't Kill Bill
- Start date
Not sure about that. When you see the same countries getting absolutely hammered twice (while others deal with both waves better) you have to think what’s going on is more than just bad luck. Lessons not being learned anyway.
Unfortunately common sense is often anything but and that lets out a large proportion of the population!
Except a second wave was totally and inevitably predictable. That it occured a few weeks apart in different countries means little in such dynamic systems.
Everyone knew back in March/April that we'd be facing this sort of situation around this time of year, its not a sneak attack, we had the time and resources to plan and strategise.
That's not been the reality at all though, throughout this lockdown a big chunk of people have done whatever the lockdown restrictions allow as if it's encouraged them.
You just can't rely on enough people having common sense unfortunately. It's quite worrying how many seem to have a bit of denial about the whole thing.
It'd be nice if the government at least issued guidance because without it people won't take the necessary precautions and it'll be a normal christmas.
We're isolating before hand then we've booked a couple of separate cottages so inlaws can enjoy key bits of christmas with us but we won't have to have the whole day together. Sounds wonderful from my perspective.
I know plenty of people don’t have common sense. My brother‘s wife seems to think if the government say it’s OK then somehow she’ll be safe. Their family is having a big Christmas. I think most posters in here are able to see things as they though. You can have 12 in a house and you’d be absolutely fine more likely than not . A minority won’t be, however. I guess it’s how much risk you want to take given your personal circumstances and geographical location. I won’t be looking to the government for advice anyway.
My close family don't want to get together in door at all which makes me happy. We’re planning on going on some family walks over the period instead.
Italy aren't doing well at all.
Belgium have brought an extremely bad situation down to the equivalent of 16-20k cases and 800 deaths per day of France or UK populations, which is still very bad. Maybe take a moment to understand what 25k cases and 300 deaths would be that Belgium were doing.
Only country out of the bigger nations to have done well is Germany and that's with the first and second wave from a region of 80 million, it's impressive by European standards but worldwide Germany is poor as well.
Cases have ballooned again across Europe with people wearing masks. People look at East Asian nations and think mask wearing is a silver bullet, but there's been enough mask wearing on mainland Europe to say no it's not and it's what you do beyond the public act of wearing a mask, how sensible are you around others in your circle of contacts. The most well behaved, organized and experienced that are in well populated busy areas are in East Asia. Germany is probably the closest we have with that mentality.
The numbers in Italy don't tell the full story. In the first wave the majority of cases were in one region, around 75% of the total IIRC, and it was rough. This time that region accounts for less than 20%. The total countrywide case numbers are the same but they are spread out this time and the stress on the system is much lower.
We learned from last time it takes about a month before lockdowns have an effect, as you have to wait for it to incubate and transmit around everybody in a household. The health services predicted peak deaths on 10th December.
Whether it's more spread out or not isn't the point, it's varied in the UK and France too. More deaths in London or Lombardy first and second time around less. We're talking about deaths in single digits that have gone up to 600-800 and in Italy's case over 800 and may peak higher, who knows. Currently it's bad enough.
Italy has 17% of the population over 70 years old. The average in other European countries is around 10%. The average age for deaths from Covid in Italy is 80 years old. Only 1.1% of Italian deaths from Covid have been people under 50 years old.
That's a significant reason why we're getting high numbers of deaths - Italy has loads of oldies.
Good luck JY
Obviously doesn’t help that your cases per 100k is the sixth highest in Europe and 14 day incidence increasing at the fifth highest rate.
With an elderly population there was all the more reason to try and stop the virus getting out of hand like that.
Still a high possibility
Hope you're okay mate
Veiled attempt at showing off Ireland
As @bazalini would say!
Ireland’s done a great job at getting the numbers down but at what cost? My heart breaks for the hospitality industry. So tough getting the balance right. Nordics aside, maybe only Germany has managed this? Although it helps that they’re incredibly wealthy with a phenomenally well resourced health service (and they love following rules!)
Not that different to the UK - around 15% of the population are over 70. The average age for covid deaths (on/before mid-October) was 83.
Does anyone know of the requirements of how to inform anyone if you've had a positive test? I have a colleague at work whose neighbour tested positive but she hasn't been notified by test and trace. I'm not sure if she has the app however should test and trace be automatically informed if she a positive test?
I hadn't noticed that in amongst all of the announcements on tiers and Christmas bubbles, Johnson also sneaked through this change on support bubbles:
So as long as a household has a child under the age of one in it (regardless of how many adults/other children are also there), that household can now join with another household, of any size, in a single support bubble. These combined households will only count as a single household for the purposes of the "three household" Christmas bubble plan, which will obviously benefit Boris and Carrie directly (how nice for them!).
A friend from work is planning to make maximum use of this change. He, his wife and their nine month old are currently living with his in-laws. His brother, his wife and their two kids are living with her parents. From 2 December, the two households can bubble up. That's eight adults and three kids, which will only count as a single household for the purposes of Christmas. Collectively, they can start searching for the two other households they want to incorporate into their Christmas bubbles for the 23-27 December period.
If my friend wanted to really push the envelope, he might even choose to form a separate Christmas bubble from his in-laws, even while he continues to live with them:
So you are free to be included in a different three household bubble to the people you are currently living with, even while you continue to live with them. Both my friend and his in-laws would therefore be free to bubble with two other households each (all the while living in the same house and with him still being in a support bubble with his brother, sister-in-law, her parents and his kids via the support bubble change on 2 December). That is now probably 30+ adults and god knows how many kids, frequenting maybe one/two houses continuously for a period of five days - not a single rule would be broken, you'd just be advised to clean the door handles a bit. It's nonsensical!
So as long as a household has a child under the age of one in it (regardless of how many adults/other children are also there), that household can now join with another household, of any size, in a single support bubble. These combined households will only count as a single household for the purposes of the "three household" Christmas bubble plan, which will obviously benefit Boris and Carrie directly (how nice for them!).
A friend from work is planning to make maximum use of this change. He, his wife and their nine month old are currently living with his in-laws. His brother, his wife and their two kids are living with her parents. From 2 December, the two households can bubble up. That's eight adults and three kids, which will only count as a single household for the purposes of Christmas. Collectively, they can start searching for the two other households they want to incorporate into their Christmas bubbles for the 23-27 December period.
If my friend wanted to really push the envelope, he might even choose to form a separate Christmas bubble from his in-laws, even while he continues to live with them:
So you are free to be included in a different three household bubble to the people you are currently living with, even while you continue to live with them. Both my friend and his in-laws would therefore be free to bubble with two other households each (all the while living in the same house and with him still being in a support bubble with his brother, sister-in-law, her parents and his kids via the support bubble change on 2 December). That is now probably 30+ adults and god knows how many kids, frequenting maybe one/two houses continuously for a period of five days - not a single rule would be broken, you'd just be advised to clean the door handles a bit. It's nonsensical!
No. Not unless her neighbour (when asked by test and trace) describes her as a close contact who she met with from 2 days before symptoms started (or two days before the test if that was done for some other reason) or any time subsequently.
According to the government advice:
For the purposes of contact tracing and isolation, however, ‘close contact’ means having face-to-face contact with someone less than a metre away (even if a face-covering or face-mask is worn) or being within 2 metres of an infected person for 15 minutes or more.
Covid tiers: Boris Johnson says measures will bring clarity
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-55097182
Thanks, I've checked with my colleague and Test and Trace haven't been in touch with the lady who tested postivie at all.
In Lithuania we had barely any cases up until September and have been touted about as a perfect example for good management of this virus across Europe. Now it's off the charts and we're one of the worst hit countries for cases per head in the Europe, it was largely caused by autumn parliamentary elections as majority party (at that time) gave in to the pressure from the public as they've decided to not take any early measures in the lead-up to second wave as it would have costed them a lot of votes. At the end they still ended up as a opposition party and we now have a difficult time controlling the spread. Although restrictions currently are definitely very lax in comparison to the lockdown in spring. We had crowds on for indoors events for up to 5000 people just few weeks ago still, ffs.
Good summary of UK tiers. Seem to be generally fair and correct.
Almost as though there’s a lethal virus out there, spreading from household to household and killing the elderly and vulnerable. Surreal, right?
Got pissed off at work today, end of the day they did the christmas decorations at the school as they do every year. Senior member of staff for the trust left some treats in staffroom and asked to keep social distancing in mind. *yet was the main instigator in making sure everyone was there*
Come end of the day, people start gathering and I leave as I'm still busy with it related issues driving me up the fecking wall and the same senior member of staff asks if I'm having some, say I'll be back soon.
While in the class, hear the guy going around getting people to go so he can have a word. 5minutes later, I'm in the class with another ta whose doing the decorations and another ta comes asks her to come as he wants everyone there. She didn't want to go as everyone is there and we're in lockdown in a tier 3 region but got pressured into it..
Must of been 15-20minutes before I see staff moving around the school again another 10minutes before the everyone had.
We're in a fecking lockdown in a tier 3 area, I can't see my girlfriend.. you did a briefing in the hall with less staff and no goodies this morning with social distancing but this is acceptable with peer pressure too? When we have a school in the trust closed for a week due to extreme cases..
Maybe I'm being a bit petty but gah
Come end of the day, people start gathering and I leave as I'm still busy with it related issues driving me up the fecking wall and the same senior member of staff asks if I'm having some, say I'll be back soon.
While in the class, hear the guy going around getting people to go so he can have a word. 5minutes later, I'm in the class with another ta whose doing the decorations and another ta comes asks her to come as he wants everyone there. She didn't want to go as everyone is there and we're in lockdown in a tier 3 region but got pressured into it..
Must of been 15-20minutes before I see staff moving around the school again another 10minutes before the everyone had.
We're in a fecking lockdown in a tier 3 area, I can't see my girlfriend.. you did a briefing in the hall with less staff and no goodies this morning with social distancing but this is acceptable with peer pressure too? When we have a school in the trust closed for a week due to extreme cases..
Maybe I'm being a bit petty but gah
Personally I go walking around with anthrax in my back pocket all day long. Who are these jokers telling me it's "illegal". I'm not harming anyone. I mean, sure, a few jars break every now and then, but nobody was near me so it's all good. Probably. How does anthrax work again? Anyway, feck the government.
Last edited:
Confirmed case in my kids school
We've had a few, but today seems to be breakout day. My step son is in Year 2, and two of the four classes are already self isolating and we just got an email today that 22 staff members are having to isolate from today. They still said we should take him to school as normal on Monday
Real men walk around bollock naked covered in only their own hair, presumably.
And women couldn’t possibly drink or play amateur sports. Fecking hell, Renua are absolute trash.
Best reply.
Have you tried looking after a baby during a pandemic? Without the usual family support it is quite hard.
I have no doubt that it is incredibly difficult, which makes it even more damning that Boris chose to do nothing at all to help people in that situation, until it could benefit him personally.
First vaccines for UK front-line worker possibly less than 2 weeks away
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...pare-early-december-covid-vaccine-rollout-nhs
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...pare-early-december-covid-vaccine-rollout-nhs
This week vs last week (county by county in SC)
Dont be so naive, he is a tory!
This is what some of the anti-lockdown people are saying. Does anyone here have counters to this research? Besides the obvious, letting the virus run rampant even with a less than 1% fatality rate would lead to tens of millions of deaths and untold economic damage?
@Pogue Mahone
@Pogue Mahone
I liked the one that asked is that the opinion of all two of them.