Was Carrick younger? Gotta be close.He's younger even than Giggs was when he was our interim
Exactly. You’d think our fans would finally start to understand the short cycle life of players and managers in the modern game and stop pining for those in perpetuityBut if we are, that's life of a football club? No team is guaranteed success and if this bloke gets three years and it doesn't work out, what can you say really beyond he was given time and it didn't go as we'd hoped.
Will he be your youngest ever perm manager?
I think that's all countries in fairness.Isn't Abola the worst of the portuguese sources? I get them all confused, I know their media is full of utter shite though.
TBF to me I didn't get past the first line of his post.If dyscalculia is a s rife as it seems, it won’t be an issue for most games.
Damn!I believe Matt Busby was 36
Pure vibes because it doesn’t work on FIFA. Conte won the league with 3 at the back. It doesn’t have to be a defensive formation, you can still play high up the field.What are we basing this on then?
Oh no, what ever will we do? It’s almost like modern football teams fire under performing managers and United won’t be the only team doing so if that is the case.Hard to shake the feeling that we won’t be back in the exact same spot in 2-3 years.
true. Just years of Gaitan rumours, I won't forgive.I think that's all countries in fairness.
Damn!
Obviously I don't know Man United's history as well as most in here but I'm surprised I didn't know he was so young.
True, but the tenures of Pep, Klopp and Arteta suggests that we may need to progress with one manager over a longer period. Only Chelsea really gets away with having success and swapping managers constantly.
Yeah Carrick was 40 too, so he was older than AmorimWas Carrick younger? Gotta be close.
He was here just a few months.Why? By the sounds of things Ruud was part of the problem
What the feck has Ruud done?Why? By the sounds of things Ruud was part of the problem
Carrick looks way younger here:Yeah Carrick was 40 too, so he was older than Amorim
From what I've seen his Sporting team close spaces in an organised manner, hence having such high possession by winning the ball back quickly. But I wouldn't equate it to the gegenpressing we've seen from Klopp's teams for example. Is it less extreme and more measured, which probably does suit our team better as they certainly aren't conditioned for such high intensity running.Thanks. High pressing oriented too?
On top of Busby, Crickmer, McGuinness, Sexton were all younger, too.Damn!
Obviously I don't know Man United's history as well as most in here but I'm surprised I didn't know he was so young.
he also left Sporting towards end of title charge to go and have talks with West Hamso what’s the plan lads ???
What about that guy that said no to Liverpool he must be good ???
Amorim it is
What the feck has Ruud done?
United’s youngest.Isnt Brighton’s manager younger?
Ye. Amorim will be 2nd youngest in the leagueIsnt Brighton’s manager younger?
On top of Busby, Crickmer, McGuinness, Sexton were all younger, too.
Chapman the same age.
Hilditch was younger and, like Giggs, a player at the same time.
Oops, just checked and you're right! I was a decade off!Dave Sexton? Surely not.
He looked about 50 odd.
McKenna is 38. So third.Ye. Amorim will be 2nd youngest in the league
True, but the tenures of Pep, Klopp and Arteta suggests that we may need to progress with one manager over a longer period. Only Chelsea really gets away with having success and swapping managers constantly.
Oops, just checked and you're right! I was a decade off!
People will make any old shit up to support their narrative that we’re toxic and everything is a mess and everyone has to go.We honestly have no idea. It's like when people were saying Carrick and McKenna were useless because they were part of Ole's setup.
Amorim will obviously decide who he wants as part of his coaching setup but having heard Ruud talk about the game I wouldn't be surprised if he likes having him around.
Argh of course. Forgot about him.McKenna is 38. So third.
3 at back will never work in EPL.
It’s possible to defend with 3-5-3 but you just can’t have an attacking side with that format.
I hope he changes to 4 at back.
That’s why conte won the league using 3 at the back. It’s actually better to attack like that because you have extra cover at the back which gives more freedom going forward.3 at back will never work in EPL.
It’s possible to defend with 3-5-3 but you just can’t have an attacking side with that format.
I hope he changes to 4 at back.
353, so we play 12 players?3 at back will never work in EPL.
It’s possible to defend with 3-5-3 but you just can’t have an attacking side with that format.
I hope he changes to 4 at back.
He’ll be in Manchester tonight you would imagineSporting Lisbon have a game tonight. Will he be in the dug out for that?
Pure vibes because it doesn’t work on FIFA. Conte won the league with 3 at the back. It doesn’t have to be a defensive formation, you can still play high up the field.