Ruben Amorim - Manchester United Head Coach

I personally believe we were always going to struggle, regardless of formation but I don't understand what he means by "sticking to his principles".

Should a formation be part of a coach's principles?
 
Feels a bit of an overly complicated response to a hipster style. Top managers are adaptable, and he said he won't be with his formation. That means that even though he has some good players he won't put them in natural positions which sets him up for failure.
It isn't complicated at all. When you are building a shelf you also prepare yourself asking what kind of shelf it should be, what kind of stuff it should hold, whether looks are important or not or what the budget is. I'd be understand your point way more when the kind of failure we see right now would look a certain way - but it doesn't - we lose games while getting outfought. Because we make individual mistakes. We have been just as bad in back-four systems and while I agree that he might overdo it in terms of expressing his unwillingness to change, I think it gets blown out of proportion and given too much weight for something that most likely is a piece of media strategy. Just to be sure, I think, he should adapt in terms of cutting down the pressing because it only leads to us creating room for the opposition while it doesn't do much in terms of creating many chances for us. Thats the adaptation I would say is reasonable. But whether we start with 3 CBs or 2 doesn't matter. In modern football you'd still be hampered when your fullbacks don't contribute in attack and if anything, thats a dead given of United for years.
 
I personally believe we were always going to struggle, regardless of formation but I don't understand what he means by "sticking to his principles".

Should a formation be part of a coach's principles?

It almost always is because each formation has advantages and drawbacks, depending on what you prefer to emphasize a formation or set of formations will fit your "principles" better.
 
Feels a bit of an overly complicated response to a hipster style. Top managers are adaptable, and he said he won't be with his formation. That means that even though he has some good players he won't put them in natural positions which sets him up for failure.

He actually said the formation isn’t the issue and hes teaching principles to the squad. And its easier to do that with a familiar formation to him than try and teach it whilst also changing formation.

He also said switching to a back 4 or midfield 3 once the principles are in place is easy and the formation isn’t important.

Also as a fan watching the formation is clearly not the issue, we saw the same problems with player profiles under ETH and we actually control games alot more under Amorim than we did we ETH. Being completely toothless in attack is quite clearly a personnel issue. When you offer no attacking threat teams will attack you more and throw caution to the wind. We know what needs fixing, its down to the club now.

We are going to have pain, we are seeing that. The thing for Amorim is at some point there is going to need to be results of all this work. When that needs to be, well I would have hoped for before the end of the season. Lets see if he does not start the new season well hes toast
 
Because it's literally the managers job to get the best out of his squad. If you need 11 new players, you're not a manager but a glorified shopper

Well tell that to Pep , It’s like Pep managing Ipswich and moaning because the squad can’t play his system

It doesn’t matter who our manager is this squad finished 8th last season and will be lower this year its a mid table team with one of the highest wage budgets and transfer net spends in the whole of Europe it’s a complete shit show and yeah we generally do need about 8-9 new players regardless
 
That it's easy for a manager, any manager, to turn it around as the fundamental issue is still the overall squad.

Don't really understand the massive amount of moaning and bitching, the situation is what it is and it's not going to change quickly. The vast majority wanted the club to decide on a structure that would allow us to bring in managers to fit the structure rather than the manager deciding the structure, causing disruptions every time we sack and hire someone. We've decided on a way forward, we've hired a manager that we think we'll fit into those plans and he was hired mid season into a shitshow that we're trying to turn around. Amorim says he wants to do it in a specific way because he's certain it will benefit us going forward, rather trying to adapt too much, he says he's perfectly aware that there are big risks involved especially related to his job but he wants to stay true to his ideas, which is another thing people kept moaning about in regards to previous managers not sticking to their ideas.

If he ultimately fails or not remains to be seen, but given the overall circumstances there's no reason not to give him time.

Well to be fair that wasn't really my point.

I get what you're saying about putting in place a structure that we can plug coaches in and out of. But it currently looks suspiciously like we are still going the Woodward route of just firing and then quickly hiring whoever is available regardless of the style/formation they employ. And whether or not they suit the players we have.

Because the club chose to retain Ten Hag over the summer when Amorim was available (we didn't even interview him). So switching to 343 only seemed to become the plan once we sacked Ten Hag and needed a high profile replacement mid-season if we're being honest.
 
Well tell that to Pep , It’s like Pep managing Ipswich and moaning because the squad can’t play his system

It doesn’t matter who our manager is this squad finished 8th last season and will be lower this year its a mid table team with one of the highest wage budgets and transfer net spends in the whole of Europe it’s a complete shit show and yeah we generally do need about 8-9 new players regardless
Even if that was true, we're 15th, not midtable
 
Partially yes. If he had no clue what to do with this current group of players, he should have been honest with himself (and our board)

Also, Amorim's rigid way of playing needs more than one summer transfer window to sort out. There is no chance he is getting 11 new players this summer if that's when he wanted to join.

I’m sure he knew it was a long term project but he would have given himself the best chance starting in the summer, he wouldn’t have got 11 players but he would have got more than 1 that’s for certain
 
He was expecting it to be a shit show that’s why he asked to come in the summer

But nothing will majorly change after this summer. We won't be embarking on a £200-300m spending spree. He will have been made aware the club is skint.
 
But nothing will majorly change after this summer. We won't be embarking on a £200-300m spending spree. He will have been made aware the club is skint.

Oh yeah for sure. It’s going to be long term but he could have built a decent foundation in the summer with 3-4 new players and a full pre season to try implement his system

The way it’s been done is just asking for failure
 
We have made years of terrible decisions and consistently bailed ourselves out of the very worst of it through sheer luck or spending our way out of the most perilous of trouble. Eventually it all comes home to roost and the crisis reaches boiling point. The years of terrible recruitment leading to a shit squad and no money to spend, an injury crisis, a crisis of confidence. Years of terrible and diametrically opposed coaching pathways.

Eventually you have to pull the plaster off and reset everything, whether you like it or not. The only thing we have to build on is youth. That’s it. There’s nothing to be salvaged from our recruitment or previous coaching work. It’s a complete reset from top to bottom. As long as we don’t get relegated this season it doesn’t really matter what results are this season, we have to build a new basis and new foundation for moving forwards. Jettisoning Amorim or compromising on the vision just delays the inevitable and is more patchwork “solutions”. We’ll be right back to mediocrity in no time and be so in perpetuity.

Days like today, what can you say? A narrow defeat with 12 senior players out, a bench full of 17 and 18 year olds, most of whom who haven’t even made debuts. In an already flawed squad, that’s a difficult set of scenarios by any measurement. We just have to survive this season, recruit sensibly in the summer and then, hopefully next season can actually make a run at being a decent top six side. The players will have had time to assimilate to the new approach, tactics and standards and the team will hopefully have been augmented with a few specialised players. It’s always worth remembering how fine margins are at the top level.

Its also true that it is always darkest before the dawn, and that this day has been coming for a long, long time. We spent hundreds of millions under Ten Hag to get much, much worse. We have Sancho, Antony and Rashford all out on loan. 160m pounds of recent acquisitions and the big star from the academy. Three players who were supposed to be the face and threat of the team. All washed out. This disaster has been brewing for years, and the legacy of massive, stupid signings, and egregious contracts is coming home to roost. Eventually we were going to have a season that was an utter, unmitigated disaster, and here it is. Putting it on Amorim is akin to calling the fire brigade to put out an inferno, and then blaming them for the blaze. He didn’t even want to take over until the summer because he could see what a tragic mess it was. Well, he showed his faith in us and now we have to in him.

Fergie took over a massive shambles of a mess too and it took him several years to sort it out, including some really low moments. People called for his sacking. From the outside it is incredibly hard to judge the work he is doing on the inside, all we do know is that unlike the previous several managers, he doesn’t have a massive budget to work with, hasn’t been able to make any notable signings except a youth player from Arsenal and a youngster from Lecce. Of all the managers who have come and gone and been given time, his circumstances and his track record would tell me that he deserves the most patience. Not least because switching gears yet again seems to make absolutely no sense whatsoever.

This is a clusterfeck of epic proportions but it’s a clusterfeck a decade in the making. The only vaguely sensible decisions I’ve seen us make have happened in the last 6-8 months, and how sensible those will prove to be is still yet to be determined. What I do know is that where we are now is not of Amorim’s or Ineos’ making. Whether they are the ones to get us out of it and build a brighter future is as yet unknown, but I’ve seen enough and been around long enough to know that they didn’t create this mess. And the way they’ve gone about resetting the club and making decisions, has more logic to it than at any point since Fergie retired. Unfortunately it’s just far too little, far too late, to avert the doom that has engulfed us this season. Statistically we should’ve been in this position already last season, and it was by sheer luck that we weren’t. This isn’t the result of one or two bad decisions, this is the result of scores of terrible decisions over a very long period of time. Looking for acute solutions to a chronic problem is missing the point entirely. This requires institutional reform.
Bang on the money.
 
I’m sure he knew it was a long term project but he would have given himself the best chance starting in the summer, he wouldn’t have got 11 players but he would have got more than 1 that’s for certain

He will get about 2-3 new players each year, that's the average for our club. So, to change the whole 11, he'll need 3-4 years.

He needs to overachieve to get to even 3 years because no United manager has done it so far. Right now, he's definitely not overachieving.

It's too early to consider sacking him, I agree, but I'm certainly not giving him any 'free passes' to do stupid shit without scrutiny. He needs to formulate a better plan for the present situation to buy himself the time needed to see the whole 11 changed to his liking.
 
To be honest he was probably the one steady head in there, think Berrada and Wilcox are both battling to be the decison makers and Brailsford keeps chipping in.

How would any of us know either way?

People on the outside have a bizarre way of deciding on things and sticking to their guns. Ashworth was lauded as some sort of must have genius to build up the entire organization. The importance of Berrada coming in from Manchester City. Ashworth fecked off and people will jump on whatever bandwagon that suits them, while him being fecked off can be down to a lot of reasons and not all of them are problematic in terms of how the club is being operated now. Also, just because we've seemingly decided on a sporting structure it doesn't mean it's going to instantly work out and that there isn't going to be modifications made along the way.

I honestly don't care at this point. It's early days and it'll take time. People took the piss out of Liverpools model with a transfer committee and couldn't understand the idea behind taking the decision making away from the manager, it would never work and just result in further complications. They had to make adaptations, they needed a manager happy to work with such a system, and it turned out to be a fairly good idea and then people starting complaining why United weren't set up the same way.
 
We have made years of terrible decisions and consistently bailed ourselves out of the very worst of it through sheer luck or spending our way out of the most perilous of trouble. Eventually it all comes home to roost and the crisis reaches boiling point. The years of terrible recruitment leading to a shit squad and no money to spend, an injury crisis, a crisis of confidence. Years of terrible and diametrically opposed coaching pathways.

Eventually you have to pull the plaster off and reset everything, whether you like it or not. The only thing we have to build on is youth. That’s it. There’s nothing to be salvaged from our recruitment or previous coaching work. It’s a complete reset from top to bottom. As long as we don’t get relegated this season it doesn’t really matter what results are this season, we have to build a new basis and new foundation for moving forwards. Jettisoning Amorim or compromising on the vision just delays the inevitable and is more patchwork “solutions”. We’ll be right back to mediocrity in no time and be so in perpetuity.

Days like today, what can you say? A narrow defeat with 12 senior players out, a bench full of 17 and 18 year olds, most of whom who haven’t even made debuts. In an already flawed squad, that’s a difficult set of scenarios by any measurement. We just have to survive this season, recruit sensibly in the summer and then, hopefully next season can actually make a run at being a decent top six side. The players will have had time to assimilate to the new approach, tactics and standards and the team will hopefully have been augmented with a few specialised players. It’s always worth remembering how fine margins are at the top level.

Its also true that it is always darkest before the dawn, and that this day has been coming for a long, long time. We spent hundreds of millions under Ten Hag to get much, much worse. We have Sancho, Antony and Rashford all out on loan. 160m pounds of recent acquisitions and the big star from the academy. Three players who were supposed to be the face and threat of the team. All washed out. This disaster has been brewing for years, and the legacy of massive, stupid signings, and egregious contracts is coming home to roost. Eventually we were going to have a season that was an utter, unmitigated disaster, and here it is. Putting it on Amorim is akin to calling the fire brigade to put out an inferno, and then blaming them for the blaze. He didn’t even want to take over until the summer because he could see what a tragic mess it was. Well, he showed his faith in us and now we have to in him.

Fergie took over a massive shambles of a mess too and it took him several years to sort it out, including some really low moments. People called for his sacking. From the outside it is incredibly hard to judge the work he is doing on the inside, all we do know is that unlike the previous several managers, he doesn’t have a massive budget to work with, hasn’t been able to make any notable signings except a youth player from Arsenal and a youngster from Lecce. Of all the managers who have come and gone and been given time, his circumstances and his track record would tell me that he deserves the most patience. Not least because switching gears yet again seems to make absolutely no sense whatsoever.

This is a clusterfeck of epic proportions but it’s a clusterfeck a decade in the making. The only vaguely sensible decisions I’ve seen us make have happened in the last 6-8 months, and how sensible those will prove to be is still yet to be determined. What I do know is that where we are now is not of Amorim’s or Ineos’ making. Whether they are the ones to get us out of it and build a brighter future is as yet unknown, but I’ve seen enough and been around long enough to know that they didn’t create this mess. And the way they’ve gone about resetting the club and making decisions, has more logic to it than at any point since Fergie retired. Unfortunately it’s just far too little, far too late, to avert the doom that has engulfed us this season. Statistically we should’ve been in this position already last season, and it was by sheer luck that we weren’t. This isn’t the result of one or two bad decisions, this is the result of scores of terrible decisions over a very long period of time. Looking for acute solutions to a chronic problem is missing the point entirely. This requires institutional reform.
exactly this
 
How would any of us know either way?

People on the outside have a bizarre way of deciding on things and sticking to their guns. Ashworth was lauded as some sort of must have genius to build up the entire organization. The importance of Berrada coming in from Manchester City. Ashworth fecked off and people will jump on whatever bandwagon that suits them, while him being fecked off can be down to a lot of reasons and not all of them are problematic in terms of how the club is being operated now. Also, just because we've seemingly decided on a sporting structure it doesn't mean it's going to instantly work out and that there isn't going to be modifications made along the way.

I honestly don't care at this point. It's early days and it'll take time. People took the piss out of Liverpools model with a transfer committee and couldn't understand the idea behind taking the decision making away from the manager, it would never work and just result in further complications. They had to make adaptations, they needed a manager happy to work with such a system, and it turned out to be a fairly good idea and then people starting complaining why United weren't set up the same way.
Ashworth had a track record, Berrada didn't do the job he is doing now at City, so is he qualified to do it. Wilcox does seem to have a good reputation.
 
After sleeping on it and having a good time thinking about it I hope to god he walks. The club are in a mess and can't afford another payout but I genuinely believe spending to suit his system is complete lunacy due to the possibility of him losing his job next season. We can't afford to restructure the whole set up from senior side to youth sides for a system we may not be even using in 9 months time.

The huge mistake on this manager which is different from others previously, he's adopting a style of play and system alien to the club and what we have currently. I don't buy this notion because we've sacked a few managers we shouldn't be willing to move on again. The bigger mistake would be sticking by this guy and letting him making wholesale changes that a new manager would be again required to totally rebuild again.

It's an absolute mess of a situation but for me we should draw a line under it and admit this appointment isn't in suiting to our football club.
 
How would any of us know either way?

People on the outside have a bizarre way of deciding on things and sticking to their guns. Ashworth was lauded as some sort of must have genius to build up the entire organization. The importance of Berrada coming in from Manchester City. Ashworth fecked off and people will jump on whatever bandwagon that suits them, while him being fecked off can be down to a lot of reasons and not all of them are problematic in terms of how the club is being operated now. Also, just because we've seemingly decided on a sporting structure it doesn't mean it's going to instantly work out and that there isn't going to be modifications made along the way.

I honestly don't care at this point. It's early days and it'll take time. People took the piss out of Liverpools model with a transfer committee and couldn't understand the idea behind taking the decision making away from the manager, it would never work and just result in further complications. They had to make adaptations, they needed a manager happy to work with such a system, and it turned out to be a fairly good idea and then people starting complaining why United weren't set up the same way.

Liverpool's transfer committee didn't work that's what they had between 2012 and 2016. They got rid of it in 2016 and appointed their first DOF which was a member of that then defunct committee under the advice of Klopp.
 
Gone are the days when managers regularly adjusted formations to get the best out of their squad. It still happens, of course, but more often than not, modern coaches prioritise mastering a single system rather than adapting to exploit an opponent’s weaknesses.

Rubén Amorim is a clear example of this. He favours a 3-4-2-1 and has made it clear he will stick with it, regardless of circumstances. If I were the owner of Manchester United, that stance would concern me—especially given his slow start. As Gary Neville pointed out after the last game, Amorim’s public insistence on sticking to his system limits his tactical flexibility.

Take yesterday, for instance. Aside from Garnacho—who is arguably more of a traditional winger than an inside forward—we lacked natural options for that role. Rather than adjusting, Amorim persisted with his setup. A shift to a 3-5-2 could have been the smarter move, putting an extra body in midfield against a possession-heavy Spurs side while allowing both Zirkzee and Højlund to play in their natural positions. Instead, Zirkzee stayed central, which left Bruno to push into wide areas from midfield, thus leaving Casemiro exposed.

A manager who is both stubborn and inflexible with tactics is asking for trouble. I'm not suggesting Amorim abandon his preferred system—every coach has a blueprint they believe in—but adaptability is crucial. Pep Guardiola constantly tweaks his approach. Jürgen Klopp initially tried to impose a 4-2-3-1 at Liverpool before realising a 4-3-3 suited his squad better. Same with Arteta.

Some may argue that United have experimented with multiple formations in recent years, but the real question is this: If Amorim gets the players he wants next season and it still doesn’t work, will he persist with a failing system, or will he adapt?
 
I see no reason to have faith in Ineos for a complete reform. The youth teams aren't even playing a similar system to Amorim from what certain posters said.

They've botched plenty of decisions thus far.

The decision to not sack ETH during the summer was just pure incompetence.
 
I see no reason to have faith in Ineos for a complete reform. The youth teams aren't even playing a similar system to Amorim from what certain posters said.

They've botched plenty of decisions thus far.

The decision to not sack ETH during the summer was just pure incompetence.

Yes, I've seen this posted too and it is particularly worrying for me because if the system is so rigid and the youth teams are not training on it since day one, then how in the hell are we supposed to integrate them into the first team in the future?

Everyone at all levels needs to be playing the same style so the transition to the first team isn't going to be a system shock.
 
Liverpool's transfer committee didn't work that's what they had between 2012 and 2016. They got rid of it in 2016 and appointed their first DOF which was a member of that then defunct committee under the advice of Klopp.

Edwards being named sporting director and the committee itself no longer existing doesn't really change the overall concept, it was just modified and it doesn't really change the fact that it was the overall concept of the manager not being responsible for player signings/sales that people disagreed with.
 
Yes, I've seen this posted too and it is particularly worrying for me because if the system is so rigid and the youth teams are not training on it since day one, then how in the hell are we supposed to integrate them into the first team in the future?

Everyone at all levels needs to be playing the same style so the transition to the first team isn't going to be a system shock.

If it's true, I see no coherence behind anything Ineos are doing on the football side. It doesn't seem like they have a plan honestly.
 
Yeah, don't get not using some subs. I mean you're already losing. What's the worse that can happen you lose by more? Is he worried about goal differential?
I think it was quite simply protecting young players that are not ready for first team football and blooding them in this environment could really damage their progress.

He had to have them on the bench because otherwise we would have too few players in the match day squad and they might have played if injuries forced it but they weren’t included on the bench as viable tactical options and they weren’t included for their own development.
 
Edwards being named sporting director and the committee itself no longer existing doesn't really change the overall concept, it was just modified and it doesn't really change the fact that it was the overall concept of the manager not being responsible for player signings/sales that people disagreed with.

It totally changes the concept. They went from a three many committee to following the direction of a single man. People issue wasn't with the idea of a head coach instead of a manager but the fact that ruling by committee generally doesn't work. Nearly no club has a manager responsible for player signings/sales and the vast majority of people have no issue with it.
 
I disagree with everything you’ve written.
You disagree with everything that everybody has written unless it's relentless negativity.

I say this / mean this sincerely and in the nicest possible way...why don't you just take a break from watching until the start of next season?

I only really watch our games now out of boredom / morbid curiosity. I'd personally be surprised if we won more than three PL matches between now and the end of the season. I have made my peace with that. I accept its our penance, our punishment for a decade (or more) of gross mismanagement.

We're not losing games because Amorim didn't bring a 17yo early enough or because he has the WBs on the wrong sides or whatever....we're losing games because we have signed completely the wrong players for ten years and then provided absolutely no stability for those players.

This is "rip the band-aid" off stuff. We know it hurts. We don't need to keep hearing about it...or how we made this mistake or that mistake in ripping it off...or how we should have never ripped it off in the first place etc...
 
You disagree with everything that everybody has written unless it's relentless negativity.

I say this / mean this sincerely and in the nicest possible way...why don't you just take a break from watching until the start of next season?

I only really watch our games now out of boredom / morbid curiosity. I'd personally be surprised if we won more than three PL matches between now and the end of the season. I have made my peace with that. I accept its our penance, our punishment for a decade (or more) of gross mismanagement.

That is really positive way of looking.
 
The sudden flurry of injuries to Ugarte, Mainoo and even Collyer made yesterday a mountain to climb. Amorim clearly doesn’t rate Casemiro and with good reason as seen yesterday when his hand was forced. If Ugarte isn’t in there, it’s tough anyway. The squad composition is so shit that even trying to find alternative ways of playing makes it hard in my opinion.

Our toothless attack didn’t help either. Zirkzee tried his best to make stuff happen but Garnacho had one of his bad games and Hojlund kept being largely anonymous once again. Bruno also for most of the game was doing stupid shit. Losing Amad for the reminder of the season is obviously a massive blow for us.

Once again, whoever signed off on keeping ETH essentially signed the death warrant to this season. I refuse to believe our board are swayed by a handful of overly-romantic fans who after winning the FA Cup essentially said ‘well Ferguson won the FA Cup as a springboard to success so obviously it’ll happen again!’ and rather someone on the board thought it was a good idea to keep him for whatever reason. Whether it was done through incompetence or being stuck in a shit situation is another matter though.

My personal theory is that Amorim in May/June said not right now but call me next year, which Berrada and Wilcox were for but Ashworth wasn’t. They are then stuck in a predicament where the guy the majority want, will come next year, and stuck with the incumbent who just oversaw the worst season campaign in a long time who I don’t think any of the hierarchy are glowing with fondness for. No manager is going to step in as a season long interim to warm the seat for Amorim so they continue on with ETH in blind faith and hope almost. Shit hits the fan as most predict then Berrada says ‘now or never’ to Amorim and then he comes, Ashworth leaves and that’s where we are now. I guess based on that theory, they should have pitched harder for Amorim back in May?
 
So what exactly are you disagreeing with then?

Do you think 3-4 new players in the summer window will transform this squad under Amorims system into a top 4-6 side?
Baleba
Cunha
Gyökeres

But that's not realistic but shows what 3 players could do.
 
It totally changes the concept. They went from a three many committee to following the direction of a single man. People issue wasn't with the idea of a head coach instead of a manager but the fact that ruling by committee generally doesn't work. Nearly no club has a manager responsible for player signings/sales and the vast majority of people have no issue with it.

People generally agreed with Rodgers about the responsibility that comes with it and that the manager should be responsible of all things. People have no issue with the concept of clubs no longer being responsible for it because they see that modern successfull clubs have changed approach. Go back 9-10 years and the feeling wasn't the same. Imagine suggesting that when Fergie fecked off, oh lets overhaul the sporting side of the thing and remove a lot of responsibility from the manager, it would've been seen as a coup attempt by the glazers and nothing else.
 
The idea that we could sack Amorim, bring in a new manager and get better results for the rest of the season is completely fecking ludicrous to me.

We are currently reaping what we have sowed, and what we saw have sowed is incredibly poor squad building. Amorim has had no influence on that whatsoever beyond Dorgu. If Amorim does end up being sacked the primary reason will have been that we brought him in midseason to manage a complete shitshow.
 
The idea that we could sack Amorim, bring in a new manager and get better results for the rest of the season is completely fecking ludicrous to me.

We are currently reaping what we have sowed, and what we saw have sowed is incredibly poor squad building. Amorim has had no influence on that whatsoever beyond Dorgu. If Amorim does end up being sacked the primary reason will have been that we brought him in midseason to manage a complete shitshow.
Moyes has Everton moving up the table & past us just fine, the idea we have to buy St.Amorim a new squad before he can win a single game or something is pure insanity, unless people think our squad is worse than Everton’s, somehow.
 
Hi all

Newbie Wolves fan come is peace but I did live in Higher Broughton for many years in the late 80s/early 90s so saw all the players at the Cliff, Fergie running around in a big gold Mercedes and a few amusing encounters with McGrath in the city centre. Went to lots of games including the ECWC semi against Legia Warsaw at OT

I have been watching the comments with interest and just wanted to say something from an outside perspective (and a supporter of a club below you in the league)

It is a really difficult situation with Amorin - he clearly has talent and is really committed to his 'project' which has served him well in the past and this was all known at the time of his recruitment. He is in a really tricky position now though and I am not sure how easy it will be for him to get out of it

He should not have been forced to come mid-season when the players are/would not be available for his system that he is known to be committed to. If the stories are true then Ashworth was perhaps right to caution but how any caretaker would have worked in that situation is hard to see (Rangnik showed that)

The future is difficult to read - there are some talented players at United but none, even as a Wolves fan, I am particularly coveting - to someone who saw the 90s team coming into its own that is quite something. There do not seem to be any funds available for Amorin to really target proven players of the type he would like so he is going to have to take a punt on some of the youngsters or buy in cheaper emerging talents - not something easy to do

In the end though football is a results game, especially for United and (moreso if Liverpool win the league) and he has to start winning at some point and that is where I worry most - are the club going to invest the money he needs in new specific players or will they wait until he has shown he can get the most out of the players he has, and will hav, for a while longer? Europe next year may be a 'must' for him

As has been mentioned many times this is not really the fault of Amorin or any indication of what type of manager he is. I just wonder if he was the right manager at this time for United and whether another approach could have helped to stabilise a difficult situation. His commitment to his project is clear but if it is not winning games then something has to give at some time. I do worry he perhaps is a little inflexible for the current time. The United fans I have known are usually very patient (I remember that the were always supportive of Fergie during his first few years) so that may help him.

The problems lie elsewhere obviously - the player culture at OT has been spoken about a lot as has been the upper levels which seem not to have improved much either. I am not a fan of Ineos for a number of reasons and don't see them as a good choice but that is my own (biased) view

We have had our share of bad owners - the Bhatti brothers who took us to the brink, and Fosun are hardly great but we were lucky to get Sir Jack as a benefactor who laid the groundwork that Nuno eventually prospered from. Ratcliffe should try to be more like Sir Jack than the Glazers!

Fingers crossed and will pop in to make some (hopefully constructive) observations

I do honestly believe Amorim knew that this would be pain. I actually believe people like Berrada and Wilcox knew it and are more than willing to accept that.

Fans have been crying out for a reset. A cultural reset from top to bottom. Well, this is it. It’s not going to be peaceful and peachy. We are a total mess as a football club. Managers have been hired nonstop. All end up in gutter. Money management has been insane. Player acquisitions have been insane.

We are a club with a rich history and a huge fan base. That will help us in the long run, but right now, we are a club that needs the reset.

The issues we are seeing right now are not on Ruben Amorim. He inherited this mess and he has to stand in front taking all the responsibility that comes with a reset. Shame on Ineos for not standing up beside him.

Even if Amorim turns out to not make it, what happens now need to happen. The circle of mediocrity must stop.

Yeah I know that game to game is miserable, I yell at the tv and get moody as hell. But then again, I’d rather have it all, than continuing with this nonsense circle we have been doing. New manager, manage out from fans, manager sacked, new manager, ………….

For me the only fear right now is Amorim leaving.
 
Last edited:
So long as you can see that the team is slowly starting to get his system and tactics, of course it's worth staying the course and sticking with him.

If none of the players are adapting and you need to sign 9 new ones, then that's a bit of an ask to back the manager because Ratcliffe doesn't really seem like the type to spend what you'd need to spend to do that.
 
So you don't think any of it is to do with him dominating the league with Sporting after them not winning it for 20 odd years?
Of course not, that absolutely plays it's part. I just think good looks and how you present yourself go a long way. Football's just an extension of real life in that sense.
Southgate would have been doing much better in terms of results.
Ultimately it was going to get us nowhere, probably.

Currently we expect Amorim to reshape the whole idea of the team, to something more promising and sustainable.
It was never going to happen in 3 months.


With a better finishing yesterday we win and this thread doesn't enter this ludicrous spiral.
That's fair and this isn't me advocating for Southgate. I didn't want him then and I don't want him now. But I don't know if we can make this argument when we're 15th and playing like we are.

Let's say we were 10th. We're an inconsistent side but one where you can see the positives and a style of play developing. I think that's what myself and a lot of others expected. It's fair to prefer that over a side that finishes higher in the table but plays pragmatic football with no long term benefits.

We haven't got that though. With the exception of the games against Liverpool, City and Arsenal, I don't think there have been any positives. This isn't just a reaction to the Spurs game. We're lucky the teams below us are as bad as they are. If this was a season where just one of the promoted sides looked like staying up then we'd be in real danger. That can't be ignored.
 
Last edited:
I have checked all our wins under Amorim.

  • 1. Against Everton. Amad was wingback.
  • 2. Against Pizen. Pizen scores. Antony comes on for Malacia. We score 2 more goals.
  • 3. Against City. Antony comes in for Mazraoui. We score 2 goals after 61 minute.
  • 4. Against Soton. We started game with Amad as Wingback.
  • 5. Against Rangers. We started game with Amad as wingback.
  • 6. Against Fulham. The only game we played with 5 defenders and won all through.
  • 7. Against FCSB. The Garnacho half time substitution on for Malacia. The legendary one.
  • 8. Against Leicester. Half time substitution. Leicester was 1 nil up at half time. Dorgu off for Garnacho. We score 2 goals in second half.

You can see even our fortunes with Amorim here changes drastically when we play with less than 5 defenders.

Take time and go through this and see if its true.
And Fulham game we really created nothing (Fulham 0.5 xg vs United 0.2) and it was the Martinez deflected shot that won it with Collyer heading it off the line for us and Munoz skying that last minute shot. Sky were even doing graphic on it early in his tenure re playing 5 defenders but he seems a stubborn dude.

Also, Dorgu on the Left clearly better - the caf saw that about 5 years ago. Now we just need Garnacho to use him on the overlap.