Wing Attack Plan R
Full Member
We have a diverse fanbase of skeptics, dreamers, and loons!There’s a good few in here that thinks the sun shines out of their backside mate.
We have a diverse fanbase of skeptics, dreamers, and loons!There’s a good few in here that thinks the sun shines out of their backside mate.
There’s a good few in here that thinks the sun shines out of their backside mate.
What makes us a top club, considering our last 10 years?
At this moment, do we have the money, resources or the players of a top club?
So you don't think any of it is to do with him dominating the league with Sporting after them not winning it for 20 odd years?It's interesting to imagine what the reaction would be if this was Southgate. I don't think there'd be a single supporter backing him.
Amorim escapes a lot of scrutiny because he's young, attractive and is a good speaker.
Also it’s funny how some people absolutely slate players when they arrive if they’re not performing after 20 games, but will say ‘back the manager’ if the manager is failing in his job in a similar way for much longer. Managers aren’t really that much more special than players these days, they should have to earn their respect with good performances, good decision making, a clear path to success - which hasn’t happened with Amorim.It's interesting to imagine what the reaction would be if this was Southgate. I don't think there'd be a single supporter backing him.
Amorim escapes a lot of scrutiny because he's young, attractive and is a good speaker.
It's interesting to imagine what the reaction would be if this was Southgate. I don't think there'd be a single supporter backing him.
Amorim escapes a lot of scrutiny because he's young, attractive and is a good speaker.
He also actually did win stuff he wasn't expected to win. The opposite of Southgate in that regard.It's interesting to imagine what the reaction would be if this was Southgate. I don't think there'd be a single supporter backing him.
Amorim escapes a lot of scrutiny because he's young, attractive and is a good speaker.
Feels a bit of an overly complicated response to a hipster style. Top managers are adaptable, and he said he won't be with his formation. That means that even though he has some good players he won't put them in natural positions which sets him up for failure.At what point do we finally stop attempting to evaluate players only by being good and bad. It got us nowhere and there isn't much indicating this will end. The football world moved on, they look for players "that fit a system". There is a reason why we get fleeced so often - we buy players that were "good" elsewhere without understanding why they were good and how this translates to ourselves.
We lost on xG vs Spurs as well. It wasn't the worst performance we've seen recently, but it's not like we played a terrible Spurs side off the parkSouthgate would have been doing much better in terms of results.
Ultimately it was going to get us nowhere, probably.
Currently we expect Amorim to reshape the whole idea of the team, to something more promising and sustainable.
It was never going to happen in 3 months.
With a better finishing yesterday we win and this thread doesn't enter this ludicrous spiral.
Chasing him, paying him on garden leave, then ignoring his advice, then sacking him weeks later = it’s not a series of actions to inspire confidence.
I think that's a fair way of looking at it and, you're right, we cannot exclude that things could change for the better.
Still, Amorim's win % is worse than Arteta's at the same stage. Plus, Arteta stands out because very few coaches follow the same path.
We fell into this trap before with giving managers 'time' because our experience was Sir Alex. However, Sir Alex was the rarity not the rule.
Pointing to the one or two times when something works out misses the 98 or 99 times when it doesn't. Right now I think its more likely Amorim is the rule rather than the exception.
I hope I am wrong. It does not make me happy seeing us slump from loss to loss. However, I see more reasons for this to continue going belly up than for it suddenly getting better: Inability to sell players at profit, inability to sign players, visible decline in confidence and results. It makes me feel that its more likely that we go into next season, have a couple of shaky results, then fall apart under the spotlight than go on an amazing run of wins.
For me, increasingly, it feels like Amorim was the right guy at the wrong time.
Knowing the club's financial position and the makeup of our squad, we should have gone for a coach better suited to the players we had on an 18 month contract and re-evaluated the situation properly at that point. We would not have won the title but we were not completely out of contention for top four in November. Look at us now...
Terrible decisions all round which have not helped the manager or our finances.Admittedly with the benefit of hindsight.
We are told he was advised come to United now or not at all
If ETH had remained in post until the summer, would we have been in a worse position than we are now.
United with all its cost cutting in recent months would not have had to pay Amorims release clause,
He would have joined in the summer, a chance to bring in players that suited him and have a pre season
It was clear for the second half of last season that it was not working out with ETH but the cup win, as great as that was, it just papered over the cracks, but it meant he got a new contract and a bigger payout than he would have done.
Brought in Ashworth after paying to get him released, let him go after a short time, presumably he was paid off as well, how much did his short stay cost overall.
Ineos sure haven’t got many big decisions right since arriving.
As bad as the Glazers have been, no evidence I can see that suggests Ineos are the answer.
I hope It works out for Amorim, beginning to have my doubts.
With a group of players clearly not up to it, and employers who are no better, he has his work cut out.
I have no idea how much it cost to assemble the squad he had at Sporting but I bet it was massively less than the squad assembled at United on his arrival.
By the same token what was Amorim expecting?
If he thought this set of players wasn't suited to his formation then he shouldn't have taken the job or he should have taken the job but then slowly implemented his system over the next 2 years as and when he got players more suited to it.
Because what's currently happening on the pitch week after week, seems like the result of naivety on the part of the club and Amorim himself.
At least if we don't get to any cup finals nobody will be able to charge the club 5m to travel over.Agreed. If they take out one single dollar as dividen, fans should protest hardcore
There's a lot of work going on to restructure how the entire footballing setup functions, it's naive to think that everything is going to function well from the get go and that the roles initially laid it will be as they were on paper. It's hardly problematic by itself and neither of us are privy to exactly what happened. People just want their balls caressed at all times.
I totally disagree. Chelsea was top 4 in europe for long years. They would win something. Barça would win something, not as much without the refs. Pep's City would win a lot, maybe not as much if the coach wasnt him.I suppose another question would be, would any other manager post Fergie have survived winning four out of their first 14 league games? It's ultimately an absolute disaster but the club also being a mess off the pitch has bought him some leeway.
The wins in the cups have given him some positivity and should he be successful in at least one of those in May, I'd say he's done enough to warrant being given the summer.
It is pointless sacking him now because, who would you bring in? Should that even be a reason to keep him though?
I keep making this point but I'm not sure these "long term project" type managers can work at United in our current state. Short term quick fixes and a conveyor belt of managers have won Chelsea two Champions Leagues since Mourinho was sacked in 2007. Who's to say that's the wrong philosophy?
Again, I have made this point before but the next manager post Ten Hag should have been somebody who could have steadied the ship for 18 months. Even if that meant letting some players get away with their shite performances in Ten Hag's final matches. Buy the club some time to get the structure correct off the pitch before committing to someone who ultimately needs that structure to succeed anyway.
In addition, if the funds aren't gonna be there to give Amorim the squad he needs then the whole thing has been fecking pointless anyway.
You are preaching to the choir, but time and SAF has nothing to do with this, I keep mentioning it but SAF had an immediate effect at United, he took the team from relegation contention to middle table during his first season and from middle table to 2nd during his second season. SAF got time to reshape the entirety of the club from top to bottom because he immediately showed his abilities and impact of the club.
He still chose to joinHe was expecting it to be a shit show that’s why he asked to come in the summer
We lost on xG vs Spurs as well. It wasn't the worst performance we've seen recently, but it's not like we played a terrible Spurs side off the park
The 1st title he won he was lucky, Sporting didn’t play that well, a lot of late goals. They fought well though.So you don't think any of it is to do with him dominating the league with Sporting after them not winning it for 20 odd years?
He still chose to join
The lack of adaptability is on the manager, the decision to appoint him regardless is on the board. The blame isn't mutually exclusiveBecause it was now or never and United is still a huge club. He said from day 1 he wanted to come in the summer and the early months will be painful he’s not delusional
We’ve hired a manager with a certain idea of how the game is played and we don’t have the players to do it. Is that on the manager?
If that is the new structure, than moving a failing coach on at the end of a season should be almost an irrelevance. If that is the new structure they should already have a succession plan and a shortlist of coaches to take over if they do move Amorin on.Great, because that is the new concept.
He's been quite open about why he doesn't want to change his approach, not sure why you want to boil it down to not having any other ideas or being unable to adapt. He's also been more than open about the potential consequences of sticking to those ideas, which is perfectly fine.
If you take away the wingbacks, you need to change the roles of the forward players as well because you still need width. As I said, I do see your point and I would even agree to it, if we hadn't experienced more than enough games where the players showed that different roles also didn't work for them. Thats the thing, I agree with the notion of asking Amorim to be a little less inflexible. But thats about the height of his defensive line. About his ideas of pressing and use of space. The formation is stuff is extremely overblown though.No, i get that he needs 3 CBs when playing with wing backs. My point was to remove one CB and not play wing backs, because they are not effective going forward nor back.
That is true but that has been a thing since Mourinho. So it is nothing new. One of the biggest issues is, that our squad isn't phyiscally up to scratch to reliably control matches. And thats not just being weak, it isn't being fit and intense enough. Stuff like that will break ANY system.Agree - its a hot mess. The profiles just dont fit this system. But regardless of profiles and system, there are times when players cant pass from A to B. Its rudimental stuff.
I don't think, thats true though. There is a notion around here, that our players might not be great but all of them are at least good and when this isn't enough for Ruben to work something out, then we need worldclass to even have a chance. I don't see it like that. Most of our players aren't shit but overall, I don't think many of them are actually good because so many of them lack in certain departments that are key to their roles though. We have strikers who are showing inexperience and crumbling under pressure. We have wingers who seem to think that it is the job of others to create for them, who are not great dribblers and often lack in working for the team. We have no real midfielder - Eriksen and Bruno are lightweight AMs playing in CM with all negative consequences against the ball. Casemiro is too immobile at this point. Ugarte is good and probably the best one overall we have, but he is still in desperate need of a partner with passing capabilities that we simply not have. The only midfielder we have, that is able to deal with being pressured is Mainoo, a teenager that unfortunately also seems to lack mobility and passing range. Our fullbacks haven't contributed anything attackingwise since years. And we have a backline that is probably pretty decent but not great in terms of speed and prone to blunders - including the goal keepers. And even though we have players that have technical levels there that might be able to balance out deficiencies in some aspects, their technical level doesn't seem to be so far away to our competitors that any balancing will happen.I like Amorim a lot, but shit, if he needs so many new players. With the best will in the world, you could perhaps count on one had the number of players he would like to retain and use in his system.
Or they made a mess of the whole season.
If that is the new structure, than moving a failing coach on at the end of a season should be almost an irrelevance. If that is the new structure they should already have a succession plan and a shortlist of coaches to take over if they do move Amorin on.
But ultimately if they have a plan/philosophy than surely the plan/philosophy is to build a squad to play 3-5-2/3-4-2-1. So we have to sign wingbacks rather than wingers basically. And presumably if they move Amorin on than they would have to bring in another 3-5-2/3-4-2-1 manager.
Maybe that is the plan I will be honest when I say playing 3-5-2/3-4-2-1 really does not fill me with any joy and most managers who play that way are substance over style, structure over risk, rigidity over fluidity. And we can see that on the pitch right now.
The lack of adaptability is on the manager, the decision to appoint him regardless is on the board. The blame isn't mutually exclusive
Don't expect to see him as manager at the start of next season at the moment. Disaster of a club.
Said it since he arrived, he's fecked.
Every coach has flaws. A good club and good environment protect the team from those flaws.
Our club exposes coaches.
We are going to be a midtable team for a long time.
Because it's literally the managers job to get the best out of his squad. If you need 11 new players, you're not a manager but a glorified shopperWhy appoint a manager that should adapt to a failed squad full of overpaid players? He should change his idea on how to play to accommodate this lot? not for me
Partially yes. If he had no clue what to do with this current group of players, he should have been honest with himself (and our board)Because it was now or never and United is still a huge club. He said from day 1 he wanted to come in the summer and the early months will be painful he’s not delusional
We’ve hired a manager with a certain idea of how the game is played and we don’t have the players to do it. Is that on the manager? Should have kept Ruud until the summer and worked with Amorim on targets for the summer window, he could have come in with a full pre season and 3-4 players to suit his system but no
It's interesting to imagine what the reaction would be if this was Southgate. I don't think there'd be a single supporter backing him.
Amorim escapes a lot of scrutiny because he's young, attractive and is a good speaker.