Ruben Amorim - Manchester United Head Coach

Millions can be added to the player if they stay as well. I mean, we are in a few competitions still - and as stated in the post you quoted - we have a decent shout at the Europa, which would grant us entrance to the CL and alleviate some of our financial pressure - that amounts to more than just a few points, but to even go for it you need bodies, even if the players aren’t of great quality, you still need the bodies

They weren't playing though. Nor have they performed for a long time. Another half a season of that and their value is only going down. Very difficult to move them on in the summer etc. All stuff we know.

Keeping them doesn't really make a difference. A few points maybe. I don’t think anybody really believes those two could be the difference between winning Europa and not.
 
I'd have preferred the manager and the club not push the nuclear option button and give it to the end of the season to see what could be done. And if there's a mutual parting of the ways in the summer? Fine. We are not in a position to not do everything possible to try to turn him around. Clearly stuff has gone on behind the scenes and they decided being left short would be better than trying to rehab him. We'll see.

So just do what we’ve always done, give him a clean slate then when it goes wrong we’ve just kicked the can down the road.

The whole point of loaning him and Antony out is for them to play well so we can actually sell them in the summer and rid ourselves of their financial burden. It’s something that’s actually going to plan, maybe the only thing.
 
Last edited:
They weren't playing though. Nor have they performed for a long time. Another half a season of that and their value is only going down. Very difficult to move them on in the summer etc. All stuff we know.

Keeping them doesn't really make a difference. A few points maybe. I don’t think anybody really believes those two could be the difference between winning Europa and not.

I don’t know if I’m not articulating something particularly well or something. You don’t plan a first team squad simply with your first eleven in mind - you will always have players that play less - they however still need to be around to account for the variables I’ve mentioned. We are in multiple competitions still.

The suggestion that keeping them doesn’t make a difference is readily proven false seeing as these same players would be here to step-in for the ones we have just lost to injury. Players form can also change quickly - these same players have done alright elsewhere so far.

And of course they could be the difference between winning the Europa or not, because to be able to compete at a base level - as low as it may potentially be - you still need first team bodies. Antony and Rashford are capable of coming up with moments - even if not consistently - and that’s important in cup competitions.
 
He's fecked. Squad was shit when he came in and they made it even worse in Jan.

Even the summer they are saying sell to buy. Considering hes gonna need like 6+ players to have a chance we are fecked because he is never gonna get that in the summer.

Club is absolutely shite
According to my limited knowledge you need more specialist players in a 3421 than in a 4231, and that's part of the reason why change of manager had almost no effect. But maybe the club thought Amorim could transform our team by just adding a player or two?
 
So just do what we’ve always done, give him a clean slate then when it goes wrong we’ve just kicked the can down the road.

The whole point of loaning him and Antony out is for them to play well so we can sell actually sell them in the summer and rid ourselves of their financial burden. It’s something that’s actually going to plan, maybe the only thing.
Fair. I just wanted to see a redemption story. That's all.
 
I don’t know if I’m not articulating something particularly well or something. You don’t plan a first team squad simply with your first eleven in mind - you will always have players that play less - they however still need to be around to account for the variables I’ve mentioned. We are in multiple competitions still.

The suggestion that keeping them doesn’t make a difference is readily proven false seeing as these same players would be here to step-in for the ones we have just lost to injury. Players form can also change quickly - these same players have done alright elsewhere so far.

And of course they could be the difference between winning the Europa or not, because to be able to compete at a base level - as low as it may potentially be - you still need first team bodies. Antony and Rashford are capable of coming up with moments - even if not consistently - and that’s important in cup competitions.

I'd say your approach is only concerned about this very moment. The here and now. In a season where nothing is really happening for us. So we keep these guys just in case there are injuries. The problem of how to move them on not thought of.

Those who agree with loaning players are looking at the bigger picture. What do we do in the summer, next season. Because that's more important than this disaster of a season. With that in mind it makes sense to loan them out.
 
At this point it’s just a farce isn’t it, he is clearly being let down by this club. He should be managing a competent set up, not these jokers. He’s got rid of three attackers and they’ve brought in nobody for him. If I was him I’d just quit, he’ll get another job at the top 100 percent
 
According to my limited knowledge you need more specialist players in a 3421 than in a 4231, and that's part of the reason why change of manager had almost no effect. But maybe the club thought Amorim could transform our team by just adding a player or two?
They haven't exactly covered themselves in glory with some of their decisions, but they knew he was not the right choice for this squad in the summer, or was that Ashworths influence. In which case he is being proven right. Amorim could work, but if he is tied to that formation and is not capable of tweaking it, signings were needed in certain positions to make it work. Which means either not keep ETH and spend that money then with Amorim or get him in next summer. There seemed to be a bit of a power struggle and Berrada seems to have won the battle, even if it has been detrimental to the manager and the team. You wonder if SJR will get seriously annoyed with what is happening and go on a mad sacking spree, then god knows what will happen.
 
Our injuries and City’s return to form makes this weekend even more demoralising as a fan. Hope Amorim has something special in his locker for Spurs. Or perhaps a a breakthrough from the youth ranks
 
Momentum is everything in football. The club hasn’t set him up for success.

I’d resign if I were him.

Your rep isn’t worth sacrificing for INEOS or the glazers
 
Players had to leave because the goalkeeping coach is a better player than Rashford and despite the flashes he showed under him apparently Antony wasn't good enough also.
So you just wanted us to do the same thing that we have done every year. So you wanted us to spend the whole summer trying to find buyers for these players before we could get our own window in order? Did you not see how hard it was to find a buyer for McTominay and only then we could afford Ugarte?

Lets get this straight. We are not Manchester United of the past, both in terms of glory and financials. Our financial situation is so grim that we simply have to sell before buying. It has been suggested that this window was used to set us up better for the summer because of these loan spells there will be more interest and we ship out underperforming players quicker, buy new players quicker and allow them to have a proper preseason. At least thats what I see as the plan. Whether it works or not is another story.

And regarding Rashford/3rd goalkeeper thing, if you really believe that players who don’t put enough effort in the training or on the pitch should still be playing for us then you really must have loved the Woodward era where any bit of standards was obliterated. Everybody has seen how that player jogged around the pitch with no intensity whatsoever and how his first contribution for villa (ramming into a defender to contest for a header) became a talking point. There was no need to keep players like that.
 
I don’t know if I’m not articulating something particularly well or something. You don’t plan a first team squad simply with your first eleven in mind - you will always have players that play less - they however still need to be around to account for the variables I’ve mentioned. We are in multiple competitions still.

The suggestion that keeping them doesn’t make a difference is readily proven false seeing as these same players would be here to step-in for the ones we have just lost to injury. Players form can also change quickly - these same players have done alright elsewhere so far.

And of course they could be the difference between winning the Europa or not, because to be able to compete at a base level - as low as it may potentially be - you still need first team bodies. Antony and Rashford are capable of coming up with moments - even if not consistently - and that’s important in cup competitions.

Rashford wasn’t getting on the pitch even with injuries and I don’t think it’s certain Antony would even start tomorrow if he were still here. As for moments in a Cup game there is every chance a youngster can do whatever Antony could.

We always complain about not being able to sell players or having to sell them for peanuts and that’s exactly the situation we’d be in if we didn’t let Antony and Rashford go. It’s not ideal of course but the prospect of selling both in the summer massively outweighs one being on the bench and one being on the stands for majority of this season.
 
Results this weekend have gone our way. Annoying that Ipswich got a point, but, what can you do? Free hit to try and pick up a point at spurs.
 
I'd say your approach is only concerned about this very moment. The here and now. In a season where nothing is really happening for us. So we keep these guys just in case there are injuries. The problem of how to move them on not thought of.

Those who agree with loaning players are looking at the bigger picture. What do we do in the summer, next season. Because that's more important than this disaster of a season. With that in mind it makes sense to loan them out.

We keep those guys because you need a first team squad not just team. United isn’t winning the league but a base competitive level still has to be kept - especially so when you have a very decent shot at winning a competition that could change our fortunes financially. If you’re not bringing bodies in - letting the few that you have, leave - is comical planning.

Loaning those players without replacements and without accounting for variables such as injuries/suspensions/fatigue/drops in form is actually the approach concerned with the now seeing as the only thing it’s guaranteed to achieve is alleviate wage pressure. There isn’t any long-term vision master-plan seeing as there’s no guarantees those loans would go well - whereas at United you still have a modicum of control regarding appearances etc.

The problem of how to move them on not thought of” loaning players isn’t a novel idea. Those players could be moved in the summer the same way they were moved in January - with the difference being not nuking our competitive capacity for the remainder of this season
 
Rashford wasn’t getting on the pitch even with injuries and I don’t think it’s certain Antony would even start tomorrow if he were still here. As for moments in a Cup game there is every chance a youngster can do whatever Antony could.

We always complain about not being able to sell players or having to sell them for peanuts and that’s exactly the situation we’d be in if we didn’t let Antony and Rashford go. It’s not ideal of course but the prospect of selling both in the summer massively outweighs one being on the bench and one being on the stands for majority of this season.

These were managerial choices. Plenty of reports came out stating that reintegrating Rashford had not been ruled out - in our current circumstances - both of those players would be a plus.

Antony and Rashford are bonafide first team players - even if not of the quality we want to compete at a consistent level. They are better options than “youngsters” all things considered

It’s one thing if you’re not bringing replacements - waiting for the summer market etc - but sanctioning exits without doing so is not good planning and you guys won’t convince me otherwise - especially with the squad we had/have
 
Momentum is everything in football. The club hasn’t set him up for success.

I’d resign if I were him.

Your rep isn’t worth sacrificing for INEOS or the glazers
That would be career suicide. Getting a big job and quitting is just about the worst thing you can do for your rep.

The club has been mismanaged for two decades now, eight of those years was masked by the greatness of Sir Alex. Since then we’ve lulled between not good enough and downright awful. It’s crazy that with every manager we say it can’t get worse and it just does, if not for how utterly terrible the sides below us are we could have actually been in a legit relegation battle.
On the flip side, the club is just not setup for success and it’s gonna take time, at some point we have to stick it out.

Obviously there’s not much to be impressed about so far but I’ll maintain that it’s not even worth considering his position until around this time next season. Back him in the summer, give him a full pre-season (plenty of training sessions) and let him go again. He might not be the one but he might be given enough time, let’s not cut our losses without giving him a fair shake.
 
These were managerial choices. Plenty of reports came out stating that reintegrating Rashford had not been ruled out - in our current circumstances - both of those players would be a plus.

Antony and Rashford are bonafide first team players - even if not of the quality we want to compete at a consistent level. They are better options than “youngsters” all things considered

Antony hasn’t been a plus all season, he’s barely played whoever was manager. 130 odd minutes in the league in over 20 games, not even player 90 minutes in total in Europa, so not much of a first team player. He’s offered virtually nothing so it’s a very low bar for a youngster to match.

Rashford has had his chances and made his choices, again he want getting picked so keeping him was pointless.

Both are doing well on loan, it was the right choice, it has the biggest potential benefit. It think a lot of people would be happier to see them both playing badly still but then complaining when we can’t get rid in the summer.
 
The manager question is so irrelevant right now. Unless Ratcliffe is about to turn into Boehly and sanction £300m+ spending this summer, no manager will be able to arrest the decline.
Even Ruud was able to arrest the decline, albeit temporarily. I think any PL manager could come in and get at least the shit results that Amorim is getting, if not better them by playing players in familiar positions, even that means a return to the dreaded 4231.
 
Antony hasn’t been a plus all season, he’s barely played whoever was manager. 130 odd minutes in the league in over 20 games is not a first team player. He’s offered virtually nothing so it’s a very low bar for a youngster to match.

Rashford has had his chances and made his choices, again he want getting picked so keeping him was pointless.

Both are doing well on loan, it was the right choice, it has the biggest potential benefit. It think a lot of people would be happier to see them both playing badly still but then complaining when we can’t get rid in the summer.

I don’t know if you didn’t read “managerial choices”. Those tend to change when the circumstances change/call for it. Players form isn’t a static thing - that’s the reasoning behind loaning them - if they’re capable of turning it around elsewhere, there’s no real reason as to why they wouldn’t be able to do so here. Antony has been a bonafide first team player for years - it’s best to avoid the suggestion that he isn’t just for argumentation sake.

“Rashford wasn’t getting picked” - please refer to “managerial choices”. The same manager also was vocal about potentially reintegrating him.

Yes, they are doing well - our current injury crisis with the fact we sanctioned their exits without replacements is the crux of my posts here.
 
I honestly think he’ll leave at the end I do the season, if not before. His system will come under more scrutiny when we lose the next couple of games where we should be picking up points. He doesn’t have the players or the backing from the board to be successful here and a couple of players in the summer won’t change anything. We will be relegation fodder next season too.
He’s a young manager who could get a very good job next without all this hassle.
It’s not working and doesn’t look like it will. Him leaving would be best for all parties.
 
I could be wrong obviously but I think hel get a major backing in the summer and we will be OK with spending.
 
I don’t know if you didn’t read “managerial choices”. Those tend to change when the circumstances change/call for it. Players form isn’t a static thing - that’s the reasoning behind loaning them - if they’re capable of turning it around elsewhere, there’s no real reason as to why they wouldn’t be able to do so here. Antony has been a bonafide first team player for years - it’s best to avoid the suggestion that he isn’t just for argumentation sake.

“Rashford wasn’t getting picked” - please refer to “managerial choices”. The same manager also was vocal about potentially reintegrating him.

Yes, they are doing well - our current injury crisis with the fact we sanctioned their exits without replacements is the crux of my posts here.

Rashford has been bad for us for over 18 months, Antony for at least 2 years so it’s a safe bet that they weren’t suddenly going to improve just because Amad got injured. Their form improving because of a huge is maybe just a total coincidence and would also for no reason apply at Utd but I know what is most plausible.

The manager made it pretty clear what Rashford had to do to get back into the team and he wasn’t willing to do it. That was Rashford’s choice, he made it and now he’s gone.
 
Last edited:
Same. The financial crisis is a great talking point for the media and fan channels but despite how pathetic the club is right now, generating revenue isn’t one of our problems.
Yeah we always brief that it's a really tough summer and then spend close to 200m.

I believe Amorim when he said we need to sell players but Rashford, Sancho, Antony will probably all be out the door already. If we negotiate a casemiro sell or even a garnacho one, I'd imagine he has all he needs to reshape the squad with a big window.
 
I will again say, I fear for amorim. Ultimately football is a result oriented business. Lose tomorrow and next week against Everton we could be 16th. No matter how much you want to belittle this squad, it is never as bad as 16th. Something has to give soon. Either he becomes bold and start using academy players smartly and the result and performance improve or someone like Hojlund Garnacho explode and save our season to some extent.
 
Same. The financial crisis is a great talking point for the media and fan channels but despite how pathetic the club is right now, generating revenue isn’t one of our problems.
We generate a lot of revenue, unfortunately not as much as we spend. It’s all out in the public domain, I’m not sure why this is even a debate.

The club has been losing significant sums each year since covid, despite fairly high premier league finishes and European football. We will lose about £30 million just for finishing 10 places lower than before. No european football tv money and the subsequent lack of match revenue could cost another £40million. Add to that the sacking of ten hag and hiring of Amorim and other appointments.

That’s almost £100 million on top of the general losses that we’ve sustained every year recently. You guys are delusional.
 
Our most technical players in the front line and back line are injured with Amad and Martinez for the rest of the season. Not to mention that Amad has been involved in 43% of our goals this season. Mount and Shaw will have another niggle and be out for the rest of the season, so you can’t count on both to cover Amad and Martinez positions.

Our rivals in the relegation battle as gaining form too.

Too many things are going wrong. We may ACTUALLY be in regulation battle. Look at our remaining fixtures ffs.

 
Our most technical players in the front line and back line are injured with Amad and Martinez for the rest of the season. Not to mention that Amad has been involved in 43% of our goals this season. Mount and Shaw will have another niggle and be out for the rest of the season, so you can’t count on both to cover Amad and Martinez positions.

Our rivals in the relegation battle as gaining form too.

Too many things are going wrong. We may ACTUALLY be in regulation battle. Look at our remaining fixtures ffs.


The other players simply have to step up and there's no way around it. If Hojlund, Zirkzee, and Garnacho don't start firing then we're in big trouble, but they simply have to, no excuses.
 
Same. The financial crisis is a great talking point for the media and fan channels but despite how pathetic the club is right now, generating revenue isn’t one of our problems.
Some of you really need to read the room. Or just some of the financials.
 
We generate a lot of revenue, unfortunately not as much as we spend. It’s all out in the public domain, I’m not sure why this is even a debate.

The club has been losing significant sums each year since covid, despite fairly high premier league finishes and European football. We will lose about £30 million just for finishing 10 places lower than before. No european football tv money and the subsequent lack of match revenue could cost another £40million. Add to that the sacking of ten hag and hiring of Amorim and other appointments.

That’s almost £100 million on top of the general losses that we’ve sustained every year recently. You guys are delusional.
This. It's no secret our financials are absolutely fecked.
 
We generate a lot of revenue, unfortunately not as much as we spend. It’s all out in the public domain, I’m not sure why this is even a debate.

The club has been losing significant sums each year since covid, despite fairly high premier league finishes and European football. We will lose about £30 million just for finishing 10 places lower than before. No european football tv money and the subsequent lack of match revenue could cost another £40million. Add to that the sacking of ten hag and hiring of Amorim and other appointments.

That’s almost £100 million on top of the general losses that we’ve sustained every year recently. You guys are delusional.
Don't we lose a chunk of the Adidas money as well?

Amazing people still think we're going to somehow spend our way out of this mess.
 
Some of you really need to read the room. Or just some of the financials.
Huge amounts of debt (check)
30 mil+ interest payments (check)
Recurrent annual losses worth 10s-100s of millions (check)
100s of millions of outstanding payments in player purchases (check)
Disintegrating infrastructure (check)
Near worthless squad (check)
Leeches of majority owners who:
1. Refuse to put own money into the club
2. Refuse to allow minority owners to put money in for equity (check and check)
Incompetent minority owners who are in over their head (check)

Yeah, some people need to wake up, that's for sure. I wouldn't be surprised if we go into administration in a few years time
 
Feel for him. He has a crap squad of players, the financial situation is dire, and confidence is rock bottom. I think 12-13th place finish is the best we can hope for.
 
We're working on improving long term tangible and intangible aspects and people are acting pressed over league position in a throwaway season