Ruben Amorim - Manchester United Head Coach

New guy comes in, reverts to whatever "works": "See? A good manager gets instant results!"

A few weeks later, we suck again: "It was a new manager's bounce, honeymoon is over!"

A few months later: "At least Amorim was trying to implement his style, don't know what this guy is trying to achieve!"

Final decision: "Sack the fraud!"

Rinse and repeat.
„Rashford would have been perfect in this new system“

Bafffled about the level of criticism he gets… not saying he didnt make mistakes but way over the top for me
 
How long have ancelotti and simeone been the coaches with an actual footballing hierarchy?

Simeone transformed Atletico, a notoriously poorly managed club in a matter of weeks. From memory they were utterly useless defensively and almost magically, he made them shut the shop and play with high intensity. Within a year, they were the undisputed third best team behind two all time great teams.
 
We should definitely be winning one of the two.

Teams that could beat us in the Europa League: Bilbao, Sociedad, Frankfurt, Lyon and Spurs.

Teams that could beat us in the FA Cup: City, Bournemouth, Newcastle, Brighton, Villa/Spurs, Forest.

You and I have a very different definition of “definitely”

We should almost certainly be getting dropped out of both, because we are a poor side. However, we do have an outside chance at each.
 
While what you say isn't strictly wrong, I would argue that these are examples of how a great manager is important to get great results and squeeze as much as possible out of less than ideal or undesired players. While Klopp didn't want Salah when he got him, he made the absolute best out of the situation, Mourinho didn't trust De Bruyne but he had Hazard, Oscar and Willian playing at a very high level and SAF was SAF by the end any player was playing way above his anticipated abilities.

The reason these abilities are extremely important is because mistakes in the transfer market are common, all clubs have to deal with options that weren't at the top of their lists and money is finite, you can't spend without limit. A good head coach, a worthwile head coach needs to maximize his options whether they are part of his ideals or not, it's a prerequisite if a head coach refuse to do it or lacks the abilities to do it then he shouldn't be part of any ambitious club future because these managers will cost you a fortune by being highly inefficient.
I 100% agree with you as a great coach will find a way with players they wanted or players that were recruited for them and in a worst case scenario they tweak their system in order for things to work, the problem is we have none of the above happening and for all Amorim’s statements of not enough time to coach on the training pitch there has been time to work out his best eleven and to tweak things in order for things to work for now.

It goes back to what I originally said though in that it’s why non footballing people shouldn’t be making footballing decisions and Ashworth as Sporting Director and the person heading the footballing department should have been allowed to do his job in regard to whether ETH stayed on or not, our footballing style and identity, instructing the scouting and recruitment departments and who replaced ETH whether it was Amorim or not and it 100% should not have been Brailsford or Berrada as they are no different to Woodward or Arnold.

I think Amorim is potentially a fantastic head coach but I do think he needs the right set up in place so he can have the players he wants, play his system and has footballing people above him like he did with Hugo Viana whereas at United no one knows who’s in charge as Brailsford and Berrada seem to be making footballing decisions whilst an actual football person in Wilcox is just kind of there, having a genuine structure and hierarchy where everyone has set roles and a Sporting Director in charge of the footballing department would stop things like every new manager having a different system to the last and needing an overhaul wouldn’t keep happening.
 
Teams that could beat us in the Europa - any of them, since we struggled to beat Southampton

Teams that could beat us in the FA Cup - any of them, since we struggled to beat Southampton

We could win them both, as easily as we lose to the worst team in it. Liverpool, City and Arsenal showed when we get going, we can play and knock these teams out of cup competitions. But a lot of the time we are just shit.
 
Simeone transformed Atletico, a notoriously poorly managed club in a matter of weeks. From memory they were utterly useless defensively and almost magically, he made them shut the shop and play with high intensity. Within a year, they were the undisputed third best team behind two all time great teams.

While mentioning this are you going to mention Amorim transformed Sporting and won the league twice against the bigger, richer and better teams of Benfica and Porto.
 
While mentioning this are you going to mention Amorim transformed Sporting and won the league twice against the bigger, richer and better teams of Benfica and Porto.

I don't know Amorim, so no I won't mention something I'm not familiar with.
 
This is a weird comment. Those managers actually made CL football and did win trophies (Ole unlucky not to win Europa).

Amorim almost has as many losses as wins for us. Which is not to put him down, but I don't share the optimism many have that he's playing some high level 4D chess that no one else understands.

So, any examples of people saying this or... ?
 
I know what Simeone the coach has done, I followed Atletico closely. I used to follow SCP until Jorge Jesus left and know very little about what happened since.
But using a search engine takes 2 minutes, especially if you are going to use other managers achievements vs Amorim, in the Amorim thread.
 
But using a search engine takes 2 minutes, especially if you are going to use other managers achievements vs Amorim, in the Amorim thread.

You see that's the thing. I don't consider that 2 minutes of Google gives me any clear idea about what a manager is and isn't, or what he has actually done from a technical standpoint. But that's only me.

Also I there is no reason for me to mention Amorim, the question was how long simeone and Ancelotti coached their current teams with an actual Football hierarchy. Simeone took over a fire tire of a Football club.
 
Simeone transformed Atletico, a notoriously poorly managed club in a matter of weeks. From memory they were utterly useless defensively and almost magically, he made them shut the shop and play with high intensity. Within a year, they were the undisputed third best team behind two all time great teams.

I'm aware of Atletico since I have family in Madrid, theres also the fact other teams fell off the cliff such as Valencia losing David Silva and Villa and Unai Emery.

I think the league is weaker too, we cant compare La Liga with the Prem with Liverpool, Chelsea, Arsenal, City, Man Utd, Tottenham and now Newcastle and Villa.
 
While mentioning this are you going to mention Amorim transformed Sporting and won the league twice against the bigger, richer and better teams of Benfica and Porto.
You’re reinforcing their point. Regardless of the situation at Sporting, Amorim did well.

He was clearly a good coach for that level. Remains to be seen if he can do it in the PL, with multiple coaches of similar and better experience.
 
I'm aware of Atletico since I have family in Madrid, theres also the fact other teams fell off the cliff such as Valencia losing David Silva and Villa and Unai Emery.

I think the league is weaker too, we cant compare La Liga with the Prem with Liverpool, Chelsea, Arsenal, City, Man Utd, Tottenham and now Newcastle and Villa.

Fair enough, Simeone made no difference.
 
I don't post much on here but I'll try to give my view on our manager by comparing him to others in a similar time frame.
Klopp took 3 seasons to get Liverpool flying.
Lego Pep again took 3 seasons to get Arsenal as a title challenger/big team.

Our club has been ruined by mismanagement upstairs with them cretins the Glazers family and their idiot workers doing their work for them.
Now Ruben is here with a plan and with upstairs people backing him. This season, I don't care about. Next season, with a transfer window, he gets his players in. We stuck with a bunch from Jose, Ole, Erik squads.

Look up when Ruben first started out as a manager players and fans didn't like him and his tactics. By the end of that season, they loved Ruben and his tactics.
 
Folks, Amorim is going to build a young, hungry, athletic and dynamic Manchester united team, but it's going to take time.

Stop worrying about the next game and take a longer term view of it with what I've said above in mind at all times.

The recruitment strategy is very clearly aimed at this long term goal.

I hope the leadership team have the balls to see it through and to ignore the fecking whining of fans wanting an instant fix.
 
Fair enough, Simeone made no difference.
He has made a huge difference we all know that but I'm saying the league isn't as competitive.

Simeone is a modern great, he has made a team of assholes but with technicality nobody likes to play them.

The conveyor belt of talent he's helped too I have no doubts, I'm saying that Spanish football has been shit for a long time, Valencia fell off a cliff during the same time.

I don't think Simeone would be a great Prem manager but in Italy and Spain I think his style works.
 
He has made a huge difference we all know that but I'm saying the league isn't as competitive.

Simeone is a modern great, he has made a team of assholes but with technicality nobody likes to play them.

The conveyor belt of talent he's helped too I have no doubts, I'm saying that Spanish football has been shit for a long time, Valencia fell off a cliff during the same time.

I don't think Simeone would be a great Prem manager but in Italy and Spain I think his style works.

La Liga dominated the 2010s at a continental level and especially the early 2010s, no league was more dominant. If La Liga was so poor then why other leagues struggled to beat spanish teams in both the EL and CL?
 
La Liga dominated the 2010s at a continental level and especially the early 2010s, no league was more dominant. If La Liga was so poor then why other leagues struggled to beat spanish teams in both the EL and CL?
This point seems to be raised a lot, we're talking about the relative strength of the league meaning anyone can beat anyone in the Prem, in Spain you assume a win for the top 3.

Hence managers come to the Prem from other leagues and it's not always easy.

Also Messi and Ronaldo were dominant in that era. Which is why Real won the majority of the CLs and Barca.

Yes we had Villarreal win a lot of ELs in that time too.
 
This point seems to be raised a lot, we're talking about the relative strength of the league meaning anyone can beat anyone in the Prem, in Spain you assume a win for the top 3.

Hence managers come to the Prem from other leagues and it's not always easy.

And the point was that assuming a win for Atletico wasn't a thing before Simeone, he created that expectation with his work. Surely that point is obvious?

Also the PL part is BS, the bottom half PL teams don't win more than in other leagues.
 
And the point was that assuming a win for Atletico wasn't a thing before Simeone, he created that expectation with his work. Surely that point is obvious?

Again within Spain yes, I think in Spain and Italy his style is great.
 
Again within Spain yes, I think in Spain and Italy his style is great.

That wasn't point, you keep moving the goalpost. And you share fallacies, have a look at La Liga right now and compare it with the PL, look at how many wins teams have across the board, do the same with Serie A.
 
Malacia is a fullback though, don’t understand how that relates to Antony or why a few people persisted with this idea of Antony doing a defensive job just because he’s a shit forward.
That’s the point Malacia is fullback, while Antony is winger. The idea is Amorim considers wingback as winger. That’s why my original question was ‘’Why didn’t he try Antony as RWB if he considers wingback as winger then?’’
 
Lets debase some myths here.

Its not petulant, lacking patience, knee jerky or having a meltdown to be unconvinced on Amorim.

-Results and performances are much worse than Ten Hag. There has been no new manager bounce. Players are being played out of position (Mainoo striker, Bruno CM, Dorgu and Dalot inverted).
-The squad clearly cant play his formation and style, RA is getting more and more frustrated, so much hes doing training sessions on the OT pitch after games. How long before he loses the dressing room, if he hasnt already?
-I was concerned even before his first match because of his formation. The fact of the matter is, successful clubs that play wing backs are in the minority. I can only think of Inter and Conte's Chelsea that have deployed it and won things
-Liverpool have already turned RA down because they thought he would not suit their squad. Look how Slot has hit the ground running
-Ashworth was touted as the best in class, and was sacked because he refused to green light Amorim due to the issues we are now experiencing
-If RA had shown any green shoots of progress or cause for optimism in the 3 months he has been here I would be willing to give him a chance. But it clearly isnt working. The team is vastly underperforming. Its not a crap squad of players. There are internationals galore. Its a top 8 team, not 16th.
-Given a manger time, does not mean things will be turned around
-Has RA given any signs that he deserves 200m and carte blanche to buy and sell who he chooses in the summer?
-What happens if it all goes tits up, hes sacked next October, and we have a squad full of 532 players? Are we going to have to find another 532 manager?
-IMO it was downright negligent, after the last 15 years for United to hire such an extreme system manager. There is nothing wrong with playing 4231/433 and simply upgrading a few players in key positions. The road to success would have been 3 times quicker and cheaper
-I feel like people give hipster managers too much time and credit. People are too scared to call RA to account. Hes been shite. Absolutely shite. He talks a good game, but the results are awful and the selections head scratching.
-People say what good has 4231 done us? Its the personel thats the issue not the formation. Madrid, City, Barcelona, Chelsea, Liverpool, PSG, Bayern....all the big and winning clubs deploy some sort of 4231/433. Christ, Fergie won all those trophies playing a straight forward 442.
-RA's inability to accept that the squad cant play his way means he either has an ego or he doesnt know how to play any other way. That tells me he is inexperienced and a bit of a one hit wonder. Ange Postecoglu is getting slated for the very same thing and doing equally bad.
-Anyone can win a title in these smaller leagues. OK he gets some Kudos for doing it with sporting. But its a three horse league. RVN was at PSV, Ange at Celtic. Ten Hag at Ajax. What has RA done in the game to make so many people believe he is the messiah? He has a worse managerial record than Ten Hag. People quickly turned on him.
-The reason RA is getting an easy ride comes down to fans desperately wanting to believe. They are tired of manager merry go round. They want him to succeed so badly, they cant see the wood for the trees. RA is an inexperienced manager, that is way out of his depth, and he doesn't know what to do. Thats the truth. Some of us have accepted it. Most fans are in the denial phase still. The parallels with Ange Postecoglou is uncanny

"RA is getting an easy ride," is just not the case. It's so bizarre when people say stuff like that which is blatantly false.
 
So, any examples of people saying this or... ?

I'm not talking verbatim. But there are many sentiments of "just wait, Amorim will improve us and you are just impatient" in response to any criticism. That might be the case but on current sample size of Utd games and his broader CV I see zero objective evidence to convince me yet.

I also include anyone trying to make the assertion that 3-4-3 is inherently a better formation or better than 4-2-3-1 in that bucket.
 
I'm not talking verbatim. But there are many sentiments of "just wait, Amorim will improve us and you are just impatient" in response to any criticism. That might be the case but on current sample size of Utd games and his broader CV I see zero objective evidence to convince me yet.

I also include anyone trying to make the assertion that 3-4-3 is inherently a better formation or better than 4-2-3-1 in that bucket.

I mean, the above is fine, but when you come out with complete fabrication such as "many people say he's playing some high level 4D chess that no one else understands," it's going to get called out, because it shows you're either not discussing in good faith or incapable of understanding nuance in others' opinions. You come across as quite disingenuous.
 
Last edited:
Dealing with player power. Sticking to his philosophy and unlike LVG & ETH not abandoning it the minute results went against him. Sometimes you need long term pain to make greater long term progress.
 
Has a fantastic chance and 1 or 2 trophies how. feck the league and go for it I say.
We do and we’ve been to Wembley at lot in the last two years but this might genuinely be the year of a Forrest, Brighton, Bournemouth, Palace, Newcastle or Villa to win the cup.

Perspective they are all much better than us right now!
 
Who said that out of interest? Neville? And has he been critical of Amorim? I've not really seen any unfair criticism of him in the media so I'm interested to know.

Neville used always be “a manager needs 3 transfer windows before he can be judged” other pundits used to follow that line. But this “3 windows” nonsense was shouted most loudly when Ole was manager.

Unfair criticism. It’s beginning to pile on. Scholes, is suddenly an expert on inverted fullbacks and fully opposes it. Funnily enough not a word against it when Pep did/does it. In general the theme is becoming Amorim needs to abandon his tactics.
 
Spot on analysis.
Unfortunately with the financial situation we'd probably have to sell Garnacho + Mainoo to fund this otherwise it may take 2/3 windows to fully address everything.
Either Mainoo or Garnaucho will be sold in the summer, neither really suit Amorim’s system.
 
While this is concerning to be fair wouldn’t it be taking Ten Hags games into account also?

The thing about Amorim and his insistence on rigidly sticking to 343 that has me puzzled is.

He says he had to implement it right away mid-season so the players get used to it. OK fair enough I see the logic in that. But more than once when asked why thinks the performances and results have been so bad. He puts it down to the low number of training sessions we're afforded between a hectic schedule not allowing the players to get used to his formation.

But surely he would have known this would be the case before making the decision to switch. Maybe he underestimated how difficult it would be to take over a struggling team, low on confidence and ask them to learn a new system in arguably the most competitive league on the planet.
I think there’s been an overestimation of his own managerial abilities coupled with an underestimation of how much more difficult the PL is from the Portuguese league. Part of that is the PL has players in every team that are as good as the best players in Amorim’s team. The drop off is not as dramatic. Every once in a while we get clubs that are heading straight for the drop from the first game, but more frequently the newly promoted clubs have some fight in them.
 
Folks, Amorim is going to build a young, hungry, athletic and dynamic Manchester united team, but it's going to take time.

Stop worrying about the next game and take a longer term view of it with what I've said above in mind at all times.

The recruitment strategy is very clearly aimed at this long term goal.

I hope the leadership team have the balls to see it through and to ignore the fecking whining of fans wanting an instant fix.
ETH had a similar strategy to build a team not playing on the counter. He failed spectactularly. Amorim's first 3 months suggest that he might also not be up to the task. There is very little progress. If he manages us next season I hope we don't buy any systems players.
 
Before Amorim joined Sporting mid season they finished previous seasons

3rd 74 points, 11 off Porto in 2nd
3rd 78 points, 3 off Benfica in 2nd
3rd 70 points, 6 off Porto in 2nd

Amorim managed two titles getting them into the 80 point range and also finished 4th in 2023.

Amorim's 2024 title really was impressive with the arrival of Gyokeres, they finally racked up lots of goals and points. Sporting weren't that far off before Amorim and under him their results in the CL and Europa are quite a mixed bag with defeats against poor to average sides and some hammerings.
 
Neville used always be “a manager needs 3 transfer windows before he can be judged” other pundits used to follow that line. But this “3 windows” nonsense was shouted most loudly when Ole was manager.

Unfair criticism. It’s beginning to pile on. Scholes, is suddenly an expert on inverted fullbacks and fully opposes it. Funnily enough not a word against it when Pep did/does it. In general the theme is becoming Amorim needs to abandon his tactics.
Never seen the 3 windows thing until recently TBH. Probably just seen it in different forms.

Ole got my backing because he got performances and results. That's the standard. Achievements.
 
How long have ancelotti and simeone been the coaches with an actual footballing hierarchy?

Simeone transformed Atletico, a notoriously poorly managed club in a matter of weeks. From memory they were utterly useless defensively and almost magically, he made them shut the shop and play with high intensity. Within a year, they were the undisputed third best team behind two all time great teams.

I'm aware of Atletico since I have family in Madrid, theres also the fact other teams fell off the cliff such as Valencia losing David Silva and Villa and Unai Emery.

I think the league is weaker too, we cant compare La Liga with the Prem with Liverpool, Chelsea, Arsenal, City, Man Utd, Tottenham and now Newcastle and Villa.
Wait, so you post a question as a rhethorical, then get an actual answer that shows the question didn't help your argument as planned, then you proceed to completely and ramdomly move the goalposts?
Kind of embarrassing :lol:
 
I mean, the above is fine, but when you come out with complete fabrication such as "many people say he's playing some high level 4D chess that no one else understands," it's going to get called out, because it shows you're either not discussing in good faith or incapable of understanding nuance in others' opinions. You come across as quite disingenuous.

As I said you're taking a throwaway expression verbatim, yes no one literally said that but underlying sentiment I completely stand by.

I'm very happy to hear your views on where you think Amorim is showing enough promise that you think there is solid ground to expect improvement with new players, pre-season etc.

It's not just the results which are the issue for me (which are worse than we'd hope) but his tactical and personnel choices are very questionable/inconsistent. One example being Garnacho he's talked about needing to learn how to play inside per his formation etc, who was then dropped for Leicester. 45 mins in he changes his mind and brings him on, and we proceed to effectively win the game through Garnacho consistently running on the outside. To me it still feels like he's throwing mud and seeing what sticks on basically everything other than the nominal formation shape.