Yakuza_devils
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2016
- Messages
- 4,369
Dare I say, the target to win the PL by 2028 suddenly seems realistic?!
Exactly. I don't know how people can say we need a rebuild . we may be short of 2-3 players but he has almost everything he needs to emulate that 343 here .
League they won in 2019 was Ajax's first since 2014. In 2019 CL they beat Ronaldo's Juve and also Real Madrid 4-1 at Bernabeu.
I'm sorry if I sound negative or am spoiling the fun it's just trying to avoid another disappointment. It's been frustrating 11 and a half years.
I think That's debatable. The defence I'd say is an upgrade on what he has at sporting, and Ugarte will likely be fine, but everyone else im not sure about being able to emulate it properly, particularly the wing backs.
That's why I said 2-3 players .
Defense and GK fits like a glove.
Bruno, Hojlund, Ugarte will do alright.
One of Dalot and Maz will be good for that right position too.
Partner to Ugarte , left wing back and a dribbler to partner Bruno.
Not perfect for sure but our new management just started. Give them 2 summer windows atleast.
A 'formality' they haven't done since and hadn't done for 4 years before. Won scoring 119 goals. They beat three-time champions Real Madrid 4-1 in the Champions League. Nobody had beaten them over two legs in three years by that point.
I was happy Ten Hag was sacked, but no need to shit on the great job he did at Ajax.
We are so back
I don’t know, but do they look coachable?So what are you suggesting here, that tonnes of different players with different personalities come to Old Trafford, and even under top managers, they instantly become “uncoachable”?
Why would that be?
They finished 2nd for 4 years, then they invested, Ten Hag was the beneficiary not Ajax.
As far as after him, FC Twente won the league under Mclaren they then didn't win a thing after does that make Steve Mclaren special or is the league poor?? Ajax went down hill because Ten Hag raided the best players.
When this guy comes in there are a lot of players that will surprise people. Our players are better than a lot of you think. For starters I really don’t think we will need a new right back.As you seen with Gyokeres first goal today, the winers are also capable of sliding balls in behind, Dalot/Mazaroui assist/key passes numbers aren't great. They don't fit 343 at all IMO. We should be after the likes of Estupinan and Frimpong
What was That?
Gotta give credit to Hugo Viana as well tbf.
That sporting team has some serious gems especially we you think about the players they've sold over the past few years.
Hopefully our director can support Amorim as well as he has.
Nah, he can't adapt to the players, that's partly why ETH moved away from what he tried at rhe start. Took him 2 games to abandon it.
It has to be his way or no way from the start, the players have to sink or swim.
This is what I'm saying. Plus ETH fecked up his chance to build his team through signings.
This time, it's Ineos doing the signings to make sure it fits Amorim style of play.
As you said, the players that cannot fall in line can do one.
I have some bad news…..
The character limit cuts it off but he says “we will have to adapt”
He only loves Ronaldo this man. Everyone else is unacceptable to him.They're lifting him up and giving him signed pictures
He's not won the champions league, I mean God, wait till he's won a trophy
![]()
But Roy, he's won numerous trophies in 2 seasons and he's beaten City 4-1, in last home game don't you think he deserves a good send off?
![]()
Its true that our players are better than theirs, save for a few like the striker whos currently on his peak. However our players have been bad mentally. And that is the most important thing, bad mentality can easily make world class talents turn average.
Sometimes I wonder how would anyone fix that part, other than to replace them with players that are willing to put in the effort. I gues we will see, if Amorim lives up to his reputation being a great communicator, maybe he can fix it.
I had the same thought too but decided to try to be optimistic about it. Afterall, we've all been sold on this best in class idea that Ineos has assembled. Let's give them a chance to prove it. They also picked this guy to play their type of football.This is my worst fear. ETH succeeded with major help from Ajax's football structure and Overmars. Amorim had Hugo Viana and Sporting's great football structure especially the academy.
No doubts Amorim is a great coach, hope our football structure do their parts. We can't keep signing players like Antony, Mount, Malacia, Zirkzee, Ugarte.
Yeah, I'm not convinced we're better either. That front three for example, I think is better suited to Amorims style of play than anything we have. Their wingbacks are too and, I would argue those are the most important positions for this style of play.That's debatable. Based on what exactly? Performance wise this Sporting team / players outperform Man Utd in most aspects.
At best you are talking in terms of potential but even in that department, Sporting has some of the best prospects / players in Europe at the moment.
Couldn't watch the match. How did Sporting win 4-1 when City had 73% possession?
I hope Sporting didnt only counter attack at home?
What sought of football did they play?
Ah yes! Good to hear! I want us to dominate, not counter.The stats don't tell the story of the game. Man City dominated for the first 35 minutes and they weren't clinical enough to capitalize.
The second part was all Sporting for the most part and schooled city though
Couldn't watch the match. How did Sporting win 4-1 when City had 73% possession?
I hope Sporting didnt only counter attack at home?
What sought of football did they play?
He will probably be the new "special one". More polite and charming. An excellent communicator and very intelligent in his speech to the outside and inside of the club. Journalists and commentators enjoyed his talks in the press room. There was mutual respect. He doesn't leave any player behind and if for some reason one player is criticised by the fans he has no problem putting him on the pitch. He also doesn't like vain, pseudo-star players who don't work hard. The cohesion of the group comes first and that's almost an obsession. He had a motto that became famous among fans: "Where one goes, all go". I'm sad and disappointed that he's leaving in the middle of the season, but he deserves to be happy and he'll certainly make you happy with his work, and you'll return to great victories.Its true that our players are better than theirs, save for a few like the striker whos currently on his peak. However our players have been bad mentally. And that is the most important thing, bad mentality can easily make world class talents turn average.
Sometimes I wonder how would anyone fix that part, other than to replace them with players that are willing to put in the effort. I gues we will see, if Amorim lives up to his reputation being a great communicator, maybe he can fix it.
Based on purely individual talents, not how they work together in a team. If you want to take a look at team metrics then Sporting destroy us. Which is why I expressed my concern about their mentality within the club.That's debatable. Based on what exactly? Performance wise this Sporting team / players outperform Man Utd in most aspects.
At best you are talking in terms of potential but even in that department, Sporting has some of the best prospects / players in Europe at the moment.
Ah yes! Good to hear! I want us to dominate, not counter.
Ah right we should have another manager be forced into building the squad around two players that have never sniffed a title race in their long careers.Don’t be silly
I see what you're saying about how he uses the midfield. Would explain why a player like Ugarte shone for him. The progressive requirements in there is nonexistent.I remain reserved on this one. There’s a lot I like about his profile in theory - young manager, at a big club in Europe, won trophies and at the right time to test himself at a really big club, seemingly charismatic. That said, I’m not a huge fan of the system and to me, he appears to favour playing around a midfield rather than through one. I felt Ten Hag seemed to have a bit of a disrespect for the centre of the park, and treated it as something to be jumped over rather than weaved through, and it’s a fear I have with Amorim. His two midfielders appear to be in the team to play against the ball rather than with it, and I worry about control from such a set up.
Anyway, these are observations, and reasons why he wasn’t top of my list, although he was always a candidate that I wouldn’t have been mad at either, as there are clear and obvious upsides too. Just some niggling thoughts that bother me a bit.
Not really sure I agree our players are better. They are far more athletic and technical in many key areas.Its true that our players are better than theirs, save for a few like the striker whos currently on his peak. However our players have been bad mentally. And that is the most important thing, bad mentality can easily make world class talents turn average.
Sometimes I wonder how would anyone fix that part, other than to replace them with players that are willing to put in the effort. I gues we will see, if Amorim lives up to his reputation being a great communicator, maybe he can fix it.
I don’t mind the system and approach, especially since it’s better suited for a 343 than it was Ten Hags 424 thing. But the key (as always) is having real athletes at the back and in midfield that can compress that space out of possession to help gain control. Our biggest issue in majority of those Ten Hag disasters was having a backline unable to step up and defend high and wide and midfielders that (already weren’t incredibly gifted physically) be forced to defend impossible amounts of pace.I remain reserved on this one. There’s a lot I like about his profile in theory - young manager, at a big club in Europe, won trophies and at the right time to test himself at a really big club, seemingly charismatic. That said, I’m not a huge fan of the system and to me, he appears to favour playing around a midfield rather than through one. I felt Ten Hag seemed to have a bit of a disrespect for the centre of the park, and treated it as something to be jumped over rather than weaved through, and it’s a fear I have with Amorim. His two midfielders appear to be in the team to play against the ball rather than with it, and I worry about control from such a set up.
Anyway, these are observations, and reasons why he wasn’t top of my list, although he was always a candidate that I wouldn’t have been mad at either, as there are clear and obvious upsides too. Just some niggling thoughts that bother me a bit.
I have some bad news…..
The character limit cuts it off but he says “we will have to adapt”
I find that really encouraging for two reasons: 1) he is not overly emotional and getting carried away by such a big win like fans or even some managers like Ole who couldn't understand that anyone can win a one off game or kill a giant on a specific day but it's about looking at the level of performance and look for a sustainable way of playing because that's only way you can win consistently. and 2) which is related to the last part, is that he understands that we cannot play like that consistently. That's not because of aesthetics or principles but for pragmatic reasons. You cannot compete regularly at the top by devising overly defensive strategies where you rely so much on the opponent missing chances or your GK having a worldly. The best teams have control and play on the front foot the majority of the time. There are few exceptions of course but why should we look at imitating the exception when we have all the resources to aim for the best.He meant in the context of that one match. Sporting were defensive vs City and very lucky. Look at the highlights, City should have been up 3 within 20 minutes.
Key thing he said.
“United cannot play so defensively”
Pretty much his entire interview was about the win and scoreline vs City being misleading. He actually wasn’t happy with the performance, happy with the result.
the amount of running they did in that City game to open them up , I'm not sure out current players will like itNot really sure I agree our players are better. They are far more athletic and technical in many key areas.