Ruben Amorim - Manchester United Head Coach

The crazy thing is a rebuild will cost another 500-600m. RIGHT AFTER we’ve supposedly completed the last rebuild under ten hag.

It’s mental. A bit disappointing that management didn’t select a manager that has a style which would suit our current crop of players. I thought that was the point in having that sporting hierarchy.

I do hope we back Amorim but it’s going to be yet another expensive rebuild if his 3-4-3 doesn’t work.

No the crazy thing is, nobody told you that 600m was a finished rebuild under Ten Hag, that's a false narrative.

That rebuild wasn't even halfway there.
 
I don’t think anyone is disagreeing with the idea of using wingers rather than fullbacks.

More you calling the manager a coward.

An Anfield would you want Garnacho or Rashford at LWB against Salah. Or to try Antony there for the first time?

I don’t think its cowardice to think not. Overly pragmatic maybe.
It's not pragmatic though, because his system needs wingbacks to be effective. Actively choosing to use fullbacks, whilst keeping 3 CBs and wondering why our attack is shit - is a bit thick from him.
 
I don’t think anyone is disagreeing with the idea of using wingers rather than fullbacks.

More you calling the manager a coward.

An Anfield would you want Garnacho or Rashford at LWB against Salah. Or to try Antony there for the first time?

I don’t think its cowardice to think not. Overly pragmatic maybe.
Can't disagree here, Anfield is not the place for such an experiment. Might consider having some more threat at RWB, but certainly not on Salah's side of the pitch
 
I don’t think anyone is disagreeing with the idea of using wingers rather than fullbacks.

More you calling the manager a coward.

An Anfield would you want Garnacho or Rashford at LWB against Salah. Or to try Antony there for the first time?

I don’t think its cowardice to think not. Overly pragmatic maybe.
Yesterday we were playing Newcastle at home. He had plenty of evidence that the Dalot-Mazraoui combo makes us toothless and impotent. His line-up yesterday was cowardly, plain and simple.
 
But we're at the midpoint of the season, not a few games in. Everybody has played everybody once. Your position in the table is a reflection of all of your performances and results to this point - not one game against us
Fair enough. As long as games against Villa, Brighton and Spurs are considered easy fixtures against mid table teams that sit 9-11. Not to mention Wolves.
 
Not really, he went for a workhorse midfield 3 (firstly was Can, Lucas Leiva and Lallana) with an intense front 3.

His first seasons many freak results but he kept with it and brought in players to fit that. Out went Coutinho, Clyne, Moreno and Mignolet and he brought in Mane, Salah, Van Dijk and Allison.

It was a 4231 not 433 and sometimes he adapted to 442 diamond
 
IMO smarter coach would have recognized it right away that you can’t cook with these players in any system and you will need an overhaul. What he should be doing is playing to their strengths in the short term to increase their sale valuation in the jan / summer in order to raise funds for your own vision given the tight financial situation we’re in. The current approach helps no one as in the market we will be taken advantage of whilst knowing that current lot (whole squad basically) is not part of your long term plans as such there’s little sense in trying to brute force your system into their heads since they simply won’t be here in a few months.
 
It's not pragmatic though, because his system needs wingbacks to be effective. Actively choosing to use fullbacks, whilst keeping 3 CBs and wondering why our attack is shit - is a bit thick from him.

This, and it’s blowing my mind to see people defending it.
It’s even more bizarre when our fullbacks are proper defensive fullbacks too, it’s not like we have Patrice Evra or Trent playing there.
 
Can't disagree here, Anfield is not the place for such an experiment. Might consider having some more threat at RWB, but certainly not on Salah's side of the pitch
It shouldn't be an experiment though, he has played this system and knows what is required. It's not as if it's made us any more defensively solid so far - if anything it's made us look worse.
 
Its not hard. He has had 4 training sessions with the entire squad as a group because of the 11 games..
If this is correct, why change formation/tactics until you can have a good crack at the team ? Seems kamikaze stuff to hope the team will just play itself into form when you can’t even coach them.
 
It shouldn't be an experiment though, he has played this system and knows what is required. It's not as if it's made us any more defensively solid so far - if anything it's made us look worse.
Again not disagreeing, whatever the intention was it clearly hasn't worked. But do you really want to see a team devoid of any confidence field Antony, who hasn't played the position before, against Salah at Anfield?
 
This, and it’s blowing my mind to see people defending it.
It’s even more bizarre when our fullbacks are proper defensive fullbacks too, it’s not like we have Patrice Evra or Trent playing there.
Don't get me wrong, I don't want to throw a kid like Amass in there and destroy his confidence, but this surely isn't the only option?
 
Again not disagreeing, whatever the intention was it clearly hasn't worked. But do you really want to see a team devoid of any confidence field Antony, who hasn't played the position before, against Salah at Anfield?
True, but I also don't want to see a team devoid of confidence, playing players who've shown to not be able to play the position, against Salah at Anfield! You have to make trade offs, I get it, this just seems like a very strange one to stick with.
 
Yesterday we were playing Newcastle at home. He had plenty of evidence that the Dalot-Mazraoui combo makes us toothless and impotent. His line-up yesterday was cowardly, plain and simple.

Anyone playing 5 out and out defenders plus a defensive midfielder is being cowardly in my book, no amount of hysterical cafe defending of the new manager will change that.
To get away with these current tactics in the Prem you’d at the very least need 3 absolute World class players up top, we have Højlund, Zirk and Amad.
When I looked at Ruud’s team selection, I saw a decent side that I felt was balanced and could give most teams a decent game.
When I looked versus Wolves and last night, I feel I’m honestly looking at a relegation side that will be lucky to average more than 1 goal a game over a season.
 
If it is true that we can’t spend in January, we shouldn’t have gone for Ruben until the summer. Ruud had settled the team and we would’ve probably had an unremarkable but decent season under him. This new system, with no new players to suit it is a wasted venture. We have no players that suit as a wingback.
 
People can moan about team selections all they like but there's enough evidence to suggest we'll lose these sort of games whoever we play. I mean people bang on about a Casemiro and Eriksen midfield, and I get that it isn't ideal, but we just lost 3-0 to Bournemouth with Ugarte and Mainoo there regardless.

It genuinely doesn't matter because we're massively lacking physically and technically whoever we play. We've just got to ride this storm and hope performances get better as the fixtures get kinder.
 
If it is true that we can’t spend in January, we shouldn’t have gone for Ruben until the summer. Ruud had settled the team and we would’ve probably had an unremarkable but decent season under him. This new system, with no new players to suit it is a wasted venture. We have no players that suit as a wingback.
I think they wanted to avoid another Ole scenario if he were to do well there would be a clamour to keep him in the post.

On another note this from the BBC this morning
Asked by BBC Sport if United were in a battle to avoid the drop, Amorim said: "I think that it is a possibility. We have to be clear with our fans."

Christ on a bike
 
Great coaches adapt and know when to adapt.

If he can’t see this isn’t working and can’t figure out how to arrest the freefall then he’s not a top level manager.

I’ve been as bewitched by everyone else by his charisma, and he certainly ‘feels’ more like a United manager than many of the others we’ve had - but if he’s too stubborn to adapt to a new club and a new league and a new situation and is arrogant enough to believe his one system is so perfect it suits every eventuality then honestly we’re better off without.

First impressions are massive and if the first impression of him and his system in United colours are of failure then he will never turn it around, and huge damage will be done in the interim.

If the last ten years have taught me anything it’s to judge with your head not your heart and right now we look dog shit on the field, and a complete mess overall as a club.
 
People can moan about team selections all they like but there's enough evidence to suggest we'll lose these sort of games whoever we play. I mean people bang on about a Casemiro and Eriksen midfield, and I get that it isn't ideal, but we just lost 3-0 to Bournemouth with Ugarte and Mainoo there regardless.

It genuinely doesn't matter. We've just got to ride this storm and hope performances get better as the fixtures get kinder.
This isn’t fully true though, under Ruud and even Ten Hag we got better results, this is somehow the worst we’ve been this season, due to the new system which we haven’t trained or prepared for.
 
Where does this '4 training sessions' thing stem from and why does he persist in saying this? He's had 11 games...
Right....and if we'd only had 8 games in the same time period we'd of had more than 4 training sessions. It's simple math.
 
Wish people stopped the Ruud comparison. He played the easiest matches he could've hoped for, went with more of the same and got a tiny bit of a new manager bounce. We would've been off worse (in the EL for example) if we stayed with him
 
Yesterday we were playing Newcastle at home. He had plenty of evidence that the Dalot-Mazraoui combo makes us toothless and impotent. His line-up yesterday was cowardly, plain and simple.

The moment he gets a wingback in it'll stop.

And to be fair Dalot did alright a couple of times last night. Put one on a plate for Maguire. Not convinced Antony would produce more. Rashford and Garnacho have had their arses kicked. Options are limited.

Agree Amad needs to be RWB for now but I think a manager has to get able to try something for a few games without being labelled a coward.
 
He's got some time now before the liverpool match ( 4 days exactly) to figure out something in training. Maybe this time he can try to shoehorn a left footed winger into the right wing back spot :smirk:
 
I shudder thinking about the team he'll name for this game
Dalot-Mazraoui as wing backs can not be it. We haven't scored a single goal with that combo, so we sure as feck won't at Anfield.

I'd honestly try Antony-Amad

Antony tracks back and is left footed and Amad has looked good when he has played RWB.
 
He needs to adapt his system to the player’s strengths until he has the requisite players for it. It’s a bit naive to try to fit his system on these players. Something needs to change fast otherwise he won’t have time to implement his system.
 
This ist just not true - two of the least creative and limited players we have in our already limited and uncreative squad.

Both been having poor seasons yet still 3rd and 4th for goal contributions behind only amad and Bruno.

In a team that is struggling to make chances and score goals I think I would be looking at playing at least one or both of them ahead of Hojlund or zirkzee or one of the wingbacks.
 
He won’t be here this time next year. And not necessarily because he was sacked.

I feel bad for him. I don’t think he realised what he was getting into.
 
Just take a month off football if you are feeling bad atm. We have had 4 training sessions only, we will have more of them now as the fixture congestion gets better and we got to do some chill on-the-pitch work within the tactical nuances.
 
Right....and if we'd only had 8 games in the same time period we'd of had more than 4 training sessions. It's simple math.
Simple math :lol:

Less games (1 a week, rather than 2) means there is much more time to implement a system rather than just maintaining & training for the next game.

It’s simple logic.
 
I'm starting to get concerned by his lack of pragmatism. He's inherited a terrible squad and has limited options for wingbacks and CMs, but appears to be very stubborn. I'm going to give him the benefit of the doubt but he's definitely raising eyebrows with some of his decisions
Changing style or idea is not pragmatism but giving up on why you were hired. Amorim has shown that he can be pragmatic in game but if people want him to give up on his style to appease the players for short term goal then we should have hired Ole back.
 
He won’t be here this time next year. And not necessarily because he was sacked.

I feel bad for him. I don’t think he realised what he was getting into.
Not because he was sacked…. Ah the old give up and walk away thought process that no one in the real world actually thinks.

Good grief
 
I'm starting to get concerned by his lack of pragmatism. He's inherited a terrible squad and has limited options for wingbacks and CMs, but appears to be very stubborn. I'm going to give him the benefit of the doubt but he's definitely raising eyebrows with some of his decisions
Ten Hag was sacked for his pragmatism and NOW you want pragmatism back?!
 
He needs to adapt his system to the player’s strengths until he has the requisite players for it. It’s a bit naive to try to fit his system on these players. Something needs to change fast otherwise he won’t have time to implement his system.
He doesn't come across as pragmatic in his interviews. He has his system and won't change it too much.
 
His character fits the type of manager we need. The things he's said in regards to fixing this team are true. He's looking beyond immediate results and wants to improve us long term. Isn't that what we all want? Aren't we all sick of going around in the same cycle of false dawns? Who gives a shit about some pointless manager bounce if we just slide into the same rut again in 12 months time?

feck this season off and let's see what he's made of after a summer of reshaping the team and having time to properly coach it.
 
Great coachen adapt.
Even the great Sir Alex did.IIRC When mourinho came to England with 433/4231,sir Alex had to switch from 442 to 433 to counter the numerical disadvantage of the 442 System in midfield.

He can only work with what he has, he should be smart enough to win enough matches till the end of the season.

He appears dogmatic,I have never seen him sub one of the 3 cbs for an attacker when we are chasing games.

If he us not careful he will be another AVB
 
He needs to adapt his system to the player’s strengths until he has the requisite players for it. It’s a bit naive to try to fit his system on these players. Something needs to change fast otherwise he won’t have time to implement his system.
This is the bit that worries me about him - what's wrong with trying our wingers at WB? Is he worried about the defensive frailties of our back 3? We're not expecting him to drop his style of football completely but he's made a lot of naive decisions I think