hellhunter
Eurofighter
I'm not even sure it matters all that much. Confidence is shot and unless we can conjure up some big time spirit fighting our nemesis, we'll go underI shudder thinking about the team he'll name for this game
I'm not even sure it matters all that much. Confidence is shot and unless we can conjure up some big time spirit fighting our nemesis, we'll go underI shudder thinking about the team he'll name for this game
Fair enough. As long as games against Villa, Brighton and Spurs are considered easy fixtures against mid table teams that sit 9-11. Not to mention Wolves.But we're at the midpoint of the season, not a few games in. Everybody has played everybody once. Your position in the table is a reflection of all of your performances and results to this point - not one game against us
I shudder thinking about seeing Dalot at LWB again. Please let it end.I shudder thinking about the team he'll name for this game
Not really, he went for a workhorse midfield 3 (firstly was Can, Lucas Leiva and Lallana) with an intense front 3.
His first seasons many freak results but he kept with it and brought in players to fit that. Out went Coutinho, Clyne, Moreno and Mignolet and he brought in Mane, Salah, Van Dijk and Allison.
It's not pragmatic though, because his system needs wingbacks to be effective. Actively choosing to use fullbacks, whilst keeping 3 CBs and wondering why our attack is shit - is a bit thick from him.
It shouldn't be an experiment though, he has played this system and knows what is required. It's not as if it's made us any more defensively solid so far - if anything it's made us look worse.Can't disagree here, Anfield is not the place for such an experiment. Might consider having some more threat at RWB, but certainly not on Salah's side of the pitch
If this is correct, why change formation/tactics until you can have a good crack at the team ? Seems kamikaze stuff to hope the team will just play itself into form when you can’t even coach them.Its not hard. He has had 4 training sessions with the entire squad as a group because of the 11 games..
Again not disagreeing, whatever the intention was it clearly hasn't worked. But do you really want to see a team devoid of any confidence field Antony, who hasn't played the position before, against Salah at Anfield?It shouldn't be an experiment though, he has played this system and knows what is required. It's not as if it's made us any more defensively solid so far - if anything it's made us look worse.
Don't get me wrong, I don't want to throw a kid like Amass in there and destroy his confidence, but this surely isn't the only option?This, and it’s blowing my mind to see people defending it.
It’s even more bizarre when our fullbacks are proper defensive fullbacks too, it’s not like we have Patrice Evra or Trent playing there.
True, but I also don't want to see a team devoid of confidence, playing players who've shown to not be able to play the position, against Salah at Anfield! You have to make trade offs, I get it, this just seems like a very strange one to stick with.Again not disagreeing, whatever the intention was it clearly hasn't worked. But do you really want to see a team devoid of any confidence field Antony, who hasn't played the position before, against Salah at Anfield?
Yesterday we were playing Newcastle at home. He had plenty of evidence that the Dalot-Mazraoui combo makes us toothless and impotent. His line-up yesterday was cowardly, plain and simple.
I think they wanted to avoid another Ole scenario if he were to do well there would be a clamour to keep him in the post.If it is true that we can’t spend in January, we shouldn’t have gone for Ruben until the summer. Ruud had settled the team and we would’ve probably had an unremarkable but decent season under him. This new system, with no new players to suit it is a wasted venture. We have no players that suit as a wingback.
This isn’t fully true though, under Ruud and even Ten Hag we got better results, this is somehow the worst we’ve been this season, due to the new system which we haven’t trained or prepared for.People can moan about team selections all they like but there's enough evidence to suggest we'll lose these sort of games whoever we play. I mean people bang on about a Casemiro and Eriksen midfield, and I get that it isn't ideal, but we just lost 3-0 to Bournemouth with Ugarte and Mainoo there regardless.
It genuinely doesn't matter. We've just got to ride this storm and hope performances get better as the fixtures get kinder.
Right....and if we'd only had 8 games in the same time period we'd of had more than 4 training sessions. It's simple math.Where does this '4 training sessions' thing stem from and why does he persist in saying this? He's had 11 games...
Yesterday we were playing Newcastle at home. He had plenty of evidence that the Dalot-Mazraoui combo makes us toothless and impotent. His line-up yesterday was cowardly, plain and simple.
Dalot-Mazraoui as wing backs can not be it. We haven't scored a single goal with that combo, so we sure as feck won't at Anfield.I shudder thinking about the team he'll name for this game
This ist just not true - two of the least creative and limited players we have in our already limited and uncreative squad.
Simple mathRight....and if we'd only had 8 games in the same time period we'd of had more than 4 training sessions. It's simple math.
Changing style or idea is not pragmatism but giving up on why you were hired. Amorim has shown that he can be pragmatic in game but if people want him to give up on his style to appease the players for short term goal then we should have hired Ole back.I'm starting to get concerned by his lack of pragmatism. He's inherited a terrible squad and has limited options for wingbacks and CMs, but appears to be very stubborn. I'm going to give him the benefit of the doubt but he's definitely raising eyebrows with some of his decisions
Not because he was sacked…. Ah the old give up and walk away thought process that no one in the real world actually thinks.He won’t be here this time next year. And not necessarily because he was sacked.
I feel bad for him. I don’t think he realised what he was getting into.
Come on mate.He won’t be here this time next year. And not necessarily because he was sacked.
I feel bad for him. I don’t think he realised what he was getting into.
Ten Hag was sacked for his pragmatism and NOW you want pragmatism back?!I'm starting to get concerned by his lack of pragmatism. He's inherited a terrible squad and has limited options for wingbacks and CMs, but appears to be very stubborn. I'm going to give him the benefit of the doubt but he's definitely raising eyebrows with some of his decisions
He doesn't come across as pragmatic in his interviews. He has his system and won't change it too much.He needs to adapt his system to the player’s strengths until he has the requisite players for it. It’s a bit naive to try to fit his system on these players. Something needs to change fast otherwise he won’t have time to implement his system.
This is the bit that worries me about him - what's wrong with trying our wingers at WB? Is he worried about the defensive frailties of our back 3? We're not expecting him to drop his style of football completely but he's made a lot of naive decisions I thinkHe needs to adapt his system to the player’s strengths until he has the requisite players for it. It’s a bit naive to try to fit his system on these players. Something needs to change fast otherwise he won’t have time to implement his system.
Interesting that you're saying I broke rules considering I got no warnings for them, but anyway you do you. And here's a couple of extra smilies just for youDoesn’t matter how many green smilies you use (literally in every post trying to persuade the cafe you weren’t wound up as feck), you broke caf rules and named called two posters in a matter of seconds because you were clearly wound up.
Listen his first ever interview where he said that it's less dangerous to use natural defenders at the wings, than wingers at start - because teaching wingers to defend at these positions takes more time than to teach defenders the attacking freedom. Our "wingers" are very bad at defending mostly, so they can't be trusted there yet.This is the bit that worries me about him - what's wrong with trying our wingers at WB? Is he worried about the defensive frailties of our back 3? We're not expecting him to drop his style of football completely but he's made a lot of naive decisions I think
My concern is that more he continues on his do-or-die path, the worse our rut will become. A few small adjustments to help the players adapt quicker would go a long way imho.Changing style or idea is not pragmatism but giving up on why you were hired. Amorim has shown that he can be pragmatic in game but if people want him to give up on his style to appease the players for short term goal then we should have hired Ole back.
ok, that makes a bit of sense.Listen his first ever interview where he said that it's less dangerous to use natural defenders at the wings, than wingers at start - because teaching wingers to defend at these positions takes more time than to teach defenders the attacking freedom. Our "wingers" are very bad at defending mostly, so they can't be trusted there yet.