criticalanalysis
Full Member
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2015
- Messages
- 7,709
I don't disagree with you that Amorim's showing his limitations.
I have lost all faith in the Amorim experiment, and I have been vocal about it too, but I can understand his difficulties to some extent.
Part of the reason why his box midfield doesn't work is the lack of physicality we have. Take someone like Zirkzee who's currently playing as one of the 10s. He simply lacks the pace and power to get behind the ball on defensive transitions and ahead of it on offensive transitions. His limitations as an athlete always mean he's going to be slow getting out and getting back in. Invariably that leaves gaps to play into.
We have too many players like that, who lack the required level of pace and power, meaning it generally only takes a couple of wall passes or a progressive carry to tear apart our defensive structure. The bulk of our players literally can't keep up with Amorim's approach.
But that is where my real frustration with Amorim comes from. Because it's clear now that this is not something you can just teach. It's the same as Villas Boas trying to make the muscle memory of what was fundamentally a Mourinho spine disappear. No amount of training was going to make John Terry into the centre back Villas Boas wanted. You can say the same for any number of United players and Amorim.
As a good coach he will have known very quickly that the bulk of these players cannot do what he wants. Doggedly sticking at it is like banging his head against the brick wall. It's led to some of the ugliest, most uninspiring football United have played in 40 years. And it's not doing anything but destroying the confidence of our squad in Amorim and themselves.
Yes, I don't disagree. My particular issue is more specific in that yes he doesn't have the right players but surely he can improve them or provide them with a platform to some sort of a middle ground to get them to where he wants.
In my opinion, there a lot of 'quick wins' that he really should be implementing that are overlooked or that he's unaware of. I understand not wanting Maguire to play a high line but surely you can tell him to move the ball faster across the back line? Why is it that every single time one of our 3 centre backs get pressed or fronted by an opposition player, the ball almost always go back to Onana? Surely he can tell to them take a touch, dribble with it and/or tell our WBs and MF to recognise this and offer short options or for a ball over the top (like we did today)? Why do we never challenge on the 2nd, 3rd or 4th ball? Always attacking the 1st and getting done on touch? Why can't we put first time balls in?
Either 1) he's extremely tolerant of these players making these choices, 2) he told them repeatedly and they are not doing what he wants or 3) he's not recognising this, all three which are extremely problematic.
Our general approach play is basically a slightly better version of the end of Ole and ETH tenures, which was basically 'here's the team line ups, have a go and let's see'. It's such a low bar for me to really see any positives atm.