Šjor Bepo
Wout is love, Wout is life; all hail Wout!
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2011
- Messages
- 16,198
For the love of football, there has to be one category that Beckenbauer can win.
Category: footballer.
For the love of football, there has to be one category that Beckenbauer can win.
There were 5 items in your list. Here they are in random order:Can one of you randomize A, B, C, D and E with random.org, please? Thanks!
Yes, thank you! ♥Does this work for you?
Can one of you randomize A, B, C, D and E with random.org, please? Thanks!
Oh, we've been playing “PM Draft” for a couple of months (5 participants now, hence A to E).What's this about invict?been meaning to ask for ages.
Ahh.Oh, we've been playing “PM Draft” for a couple of months (5 participants now, hence A to E).
I've made the poll. If there are any other options that you want to include, let me know.
Yeah, ball-playing defenders is a more broad definition that includes the likes of Rio/Carvalho/Ramos/Bonucci/Hummels. I've tried to put all the options that I've seen mentioned in the poll.This may have been clarified earlier, but what is the difference between option 2 “sweepers with liberos” and option 3 “ball playing defenders”?
Who falls under option 3 who wouldn’t fall under option 2 for example - does 3 include the likes of Ferdinand and Carvalho ie ‘covering defenders’.
Yeah, ball-playing defenders is a more broad definition that includes the likes of Rio/Carvalho/Ramos/Bonucci/Hummels. I've tried to put all the options that I've seen mentioned in the poll.
I started to ask myself this too - I think all non-sweepers/liberos are simply subsumed under "stoppers" in option 2.What's the difference between options 2 and 3, just the terminology (sweepres vs ball players)?
I started to ask myself this too - I think all non-sweepers/liberos are simply subsumed under "stoppers" in option 2.
But isn't that option 3 you talk about? Option 2 doesn't mention ball-playing CBs as a category, just sweepers/liberos vs stoppers.I took it otherwise. Ball players include sweepers from Beckenbauer to Rio/Nesta types. Stoppers are just that, Kohler types.
Slow is good.. Maybe 20-16,11-15,6-10,5,4,3,2,1?So, the ball-playing CBs thread is up — http://www.redcafe.net/threads/redcafes-all-time-top-20-ball-playing-central-defenders.448892/
I can do a slow presentation of our goalkeeping list (which would probably add some intrigue) from bottom to top or I can post the full list today, what are your thoughts on this?
20? I think it makes sense to post the whole list, it includes 48 namesSlow is good.. Maybe 20-16,11-15,6-10,5,4,3,2,1?
Ah yes.. Sorry.. Probably then 10 names at a time or something20? I think it makes sense to post the whole list, it includes 48 names
Top-20 is simply easier for the voting process.
7. R Koeman
10. Ronald Koeman
if we include stoppers then yes Koeman not a top 10 defenders of all timeNow this is the problem. Surely, not a top 10 'defender' of all time. Not even in top 20 if u add stoppers too.
Yet he makes the list purely based on his build up qualities while defending is largely ignored.
We will have a list by the end, but chances are it won't be very meaningful.
I'll probably pick him in my all-CB top-20. It's not a coincidence that he had managed to won 2 CLs with different clubs and 1988 Euros as a key member of those sides, sometimes being, quite literally, the game-changer. He's such a weird player to assess though.Now this is the problem. Surely, not a top 10 'defender' of all time. Not even in top 20 if u add stoppers too.
Yet he makes the list purely based on his build up qualities while defending is largely ignored.
We will have a list by the end, but chances are it won't be very meaningful.
1 vote. It's quite hard to get it, considering the competition.No love for Carvalho so far?
Completely slipped my mind. He should be in.No love for Carvalho so far?
Last game I've seen from Rijkaard (NED-USSR '88, group stages), he put on an utterly great performance at CB. One of the most dominant I've seen, and much earlier than the more famous switch DM/CB role at Ajax under LvG. I watched it mainly for Dasaev, but Rijkaard was the revelation of that game.Would we reserve the likes of Frank Rijkaard and Uli Stielike in our 'defensive midfielders' ranking?
Yes, near the top of mine too. If we’re looking at composure on the ball, distribution (long vertical balls and short passes), football brain/reading of the game and understanding with teammates movements/positions/space, then Rijkaard is top 20 without a doubt.Last game I've seen from Rijkaard (NED-USSR '88, group stages), he put on an utterly great performance at CB. One of the most dominant I've seen, and much earlier than the more famous switch DM/CB role at Ajax under LvG. I watched it mainly for Dasaev, but Rijkaard was the revelation of that game.
I must check out a bit more, but if that performance was in any way representative of him at CB, he'll be close to the top of my list.
All of this, but what surprised me the most was how physically dominant he was in aeriel duels and as an interceptor/tackler. A joy to watch how he managed to align this with being part of a CB playmaker tandem with Koeman.Yes, near the top of mine too. If we’re looking at composure on the ball, distribution (long vertical balls and short passes), football brain/reading of the game and understanding with teammates movements/positions/space, then Rijkaard is top 20 without a doubt.
They were incredible together with Koeman in that tournament. The weirdest combination of 2 liberos at CB that somehow worked. But I'm not sure if he played much as a center back in other tournaments (pre-Ajax).Last game I've seen from Rijkaard (NED-USSR '88, group stages), he put on an utterly great performance at CB. One of the most dominant I've seen, and much earlier than the more famous switch DM/CB role at Ajax under LvG. I watched it mainly for Dasaev, but Rijkaard was the revelation of that game.
I must check out a bit more, but if that performance was in any way representative of him at CB, he'll be close to the top of my list.
Yeah, that's why I still need to watch a game or two against top opposition. USSR was properly dominated in that game, even though they managed to win in the end. And Protasov was relatively tall, but didn't look imposing at all in aerial duels.Not that i disagree with assessment of Rijkaard's defensive qualities, but probably still worth mentioning that ussr team in attack and midfield duels were imo notably bad in the air so it was a relatively ideal opponent for smart, big athletic players like Rijkaard and Gullit to excel there. Between whole forward line and midfield they probably don't have more than a small handful of headed goals between them in their entire career that i've seen.
.