Sorry, got a wee bit carried away there.
In this age of entrenched opinions and Internet rage, you two are a beacon of light, a ray of hope for all of us. God bless you both.To be fair, I was actually being a moron.
Rather them than you:This is what happens when 15 year olds give player analysis a try
Pay WHATEVER we need to pay!Antony is the piece we need in our attack to give us a front three who ALL can keep the ball. Currently we only have Martial and Sancho as our only attackers that are good at keeping the ball in the final 3rd. In addition to that, he is a specialist RW that can cut in on his left which is a threat we don’t currently have and will add another dimension to our attack. Especially when this means Sancho will take the right side and be able to cut in as well. Add to that, he already knows the style EtH wants and the effort it requires. Pay whatever we need to pay and get him in because he will transform our attack.
when you consider we got erickson on free. Malacia for 15mil. Then I don’t mind over paying for a position we badly need. It averages out I think it a positive way.
And they have all disappeared from the thread since he started scoring for fun.Feck it.. he's on a good run, just a reminder of some of the shit posts from earlier on in the season.
This is what happens when 15 year olds give player analysis a try
Feck it.. he's on a good run, just a reminder of some of the shit posts from earlier on in the season.
Bet it took you a while to think of that one. Never been the sharpest though.@Leftback99 .. in the changing rooms. Cleaning Hojlunds boots.
Bet it took you a while to think of that one. Never been the sharpest though.
Nah I'll always own it. Lets have a look:I’d have let you off if you hadn’t of been a cowardly custard and instead chose to hold your hands up.
We can’t all be right all of the time you know. It’s okay to accept being wrong
I personally don’t remember any performances that I would say were ‘poor’, particularly in context (maybe there were a couple). Also, questioning whether a nineteen year old would ever be good, despite displaying some good potential? Very strange take.Nah I'll always own it. Lets have a look:
Pre summer I didn't want Kane said we should go for a younger striker, most disagreed. I was right.
Start of this thread defended him and lack of service. A fair point which is still true.
After a series of poor displays I questioned whether he'd ever be good enough for us to challenge again. Jury still out but he's definitely better than my posts suggest.
Poor performances were poor. Recent goals don't rewrite that history.
Recent performances have impressed. Maybe my previous criticism was over the top. Great if he keeps going.
The last 'I told you so' I got for being 'wrong' was Rashford last season. Hasn't exactly gone well since.
Nah I'll always own it. Lets have a look:
Pre summer I didn't want Kane said we should go for a younger striker, most disagreed. I was right.
Start of this thread defended him and lack of service. A fair point which is still true.
After a series of poor displays I questioned whether he'd ever be good enough for us to challenge again. Jury still out but he's definitely better than my posts suggest.
Poor performances were poor. Recent goals don't rewrite that history.
Recent performances have impressed. Maybe my previous criticism was over the top. Great if he keeps going.
The last 'I told you so' I got for being 'wrong' was Rashford last season. Hasn't exactly gone well since.
Nope. At the time Hojlund was offering nothing better. Don't need to rewrite history because he has improved.You said Martial was better than Hojlund. Just admit it was an absolutely awful opinion and move on.
Nope. At the time Hojlund was offering nothing better. Don't need to rewrite history because he has improved.
Calm down there. We get it, you don't like Martial."We play better with Martial" three days before Hojlund begins a run of returning 7 goals and 2 assists across the next six league games, helping us to five wins and a draw. The one game he didn't play since that proclamation, we lost. History happens quick huh?
Martial has seven league goals across the last two seasons as a comparison.
Worst part about that opinion is you based it on a game Hojlund was forced to play despite being ill, because Martial was too ill himself to play. And Martial hasn't been available for a single minute since that point either.
Yeah, agree about Galatasaray, I was so frustrated with the team, mainly Onana, for letting Hojlunds great work go to waste.This is still in the back of my mind tbh. There's no way a 65% shot conversion rate is sustainable - so he's doing unbelievably well in front of goal at the moment. If you look at his league goals - apart from the Wolves one (Shaw assist) and I guess Villa (from set piece), all of his goals have been him feeding off scraps and good improvisation. I am struggling to recall a single chance that Bruno has created for him (apart from Luton at Home from a set piece), feels as though his instinct/instruction is to find a wide player.
Also those saying this was his best performance - we may have wiped it from our memories but Galatasaray at home by a distance for me - it's criminal he was on the losing side that night.
Calm down there. We get it, you don't like Martial.
Your rant also didn't change my mind about that point in time.
Feck it.. he's on a good run, just a reminder of some of the shit posts from earlier on in the season.
I've given the lad plenty of criticism, mostly due imo, but fair play and hands up. He is improving with the team, well played.
Nope. Physical presence is a quality, not an actual tangible contribution. Should've had a penalty against Arsenal maybe, but that's one single situation. He doesn't turn defenders that often, nor does he actually have a lot of through passes. Neat layoffs, sure, but again, how much does that happen? The volume of these things don't add up to the sort of player who makes a big contribution even if he doesn't score.
Actually I find this whole debate slightly absurd. It is AFAICS completely obvious that Højlund is the sort of striker who builds his game around goal-scoring. He's not like Gabriel Jesus, he's like Haaland, considered as a type. As such, you'd think it wouldn't be too surprising or controversial to argue that to be a success, he needs to score goals. But that's not enough for some around here, who seem to either need to think that's not being positive enough, or to read that as an underhand claim that he's not really a good player.
And I have equally praised. Guess you missed that...
Perhaps you should look at your own shit posts about some of our other players like Shaw for example.
I may have, but I couldn't find any.
Care to quote me on the Shaw post? I've probably called him the f word, lazy and said he should be sold numerous times. The difference with Shaw is that he's technically an excellent footballer, but we've had 8 years of injuries and up and down performances, I'd have binned him off 3 or 4 years ago. But, occasionally he goes on these mini runs where he looks a top player, then he either gets injured or just looks like he can't be arsed bothering.
I don't think I've written off a player as soon as lot of poeple where willing to write Hojlund off.
Well look harder, I quoted it for you in my reply.
Well that's exactly the point, he does in fact contribute a lots of other things.I've argued no such thing. On the contrary I've written the exact opposite several times. The only thing I'm trying to argue is that with the type of striker he is, he needs to score goals. Because he is not contributing a huge amount of other things. No matter how good his hold-up play is. And he is. So I'm really, really happy with him.
Yeah, after I already responded.
Do you see him scoring 15 to 20 goals in 2 to 3 seasons yet?
I think you're spot on and with the players young players you've highlighted in your post along with some of the young players that are yet to emerge from the youth teams, I absolutely feel the current regime will at the very least leave INEOS, Berrarda and the prospective new DoF a platform to build from that has the potential to propel the club to bigger and better things. I think from the squad left behind by Woodward to the one that will be left behind currently has big potential in the mid to long-term. And there's quite a few young players in the youth team that could also emerge as genuine options in the near future.The prospect of Højlund developing along side Garnacho is incredibly tantalizing, arguably the highlight of the season (aside from Mainoo's emergence as a mainstay, of course).
As lads who are expected to mature and develop over the coming years (individually, and as a pairing), they are more likely to sacrifice and make concessions for each other — compared with finished articles who have already developed sizable egos and are accustomed to things going their way.
Shearer seems to have taken a real liking to him, hasn't he? Which isn't surprising as their games are comparable in certain respects (discounting Shearer's aerial supremacy, most prominently — at least for the time being).
Considering his profile, Rasmus should be gunning for Rooney's goal-scoring tally with Manchester United. Plenty of time on his side and it's never too early to set ambitious targets for youself (unrealistic and premature as they may seem right now). Should also strive to be one of the flag-bearers of the post-Benzema/Suárez/Lewandowski era of center forwards — why not, everyone starts somewhere?
Players like him, Mainoo and Garnacho (as well as some of the lads coming through the ranks) give us so much hope and infectious energy for the future, following a spell where things looked rather bleak and listless (both on and off the pitch). It is now the club's responsibility to ensure that they are given the platform to improve and succeed, and are surrounded by others like them (in terms of profile) — that will be key to our proposed resurgance.
I’m not interested in shaming people for comments they made, but I am curious as to why you and other posters who criticized him still think, that it was warranted? I’ve followed his every move and he rarely set a foot wrong in his first many games - he actually did more or less excactly the same things as he does now aside from scoring (though he was unlucky not to get two goals quickly and some assists because Garnacho and Rashford couldn’t score).Yeah sorry I wanted to edit my post within two minutes of posting it. Silly me. I should have known you'd be on it like a hawk. Averaging just under 10 posts a day, you must live on here.
I don't care for people calling me out for comments I made, I'll happily back them up or accept I was wrong, but don't try and make me look like a prat by only cherry picking ones that suit your agenda.
Hojlunds starting to prove me wrong....great. Why would I have a problem with that? Why would I not be happy to hold my hands up, as I did? I support Utd, if he is doing better then its better for the club. He deserved criticism for a poor first half of the season and he deserves praise now.
Grow up.
I love everything about him. Rapid progression, desire, ability. Hope he stays in the club for a long, long time.
Deserved criticism?Yeah sorry I wanted to edit my post within two minutes of posting it. Silly me. I should have known you'd be on it like a hawk. Averaging just under 10 posts a day, you must live on here.
I don't care for people calling me out for comments I made, I'll happily back them up or accept I was wrong, but don't try and make me look like a prat by only cherry picking ones that suit your agenda.
Hojlunds starting to prove me wrong....great. Why would I have a problem with that? Why would I not be happy to hold my hands up, as I did? I support Utd, if he is doing better then its better for the club. He deserved criticism for a poor first half of the season and he deserves praise now.
Grow up.
I’m not interested in shaming people for comments they made, but I am curious as to why you and other posters who criticized him still think, that it was warranted? I’ve followed his every move and he rarely set a foot wrong in his first many games - he actually did more or less excactly the same things as he does now aside from scoring (though he was unlucky not to get two goals quickly and some assists because Garnacho and Rashford couldn’t score).
As I’ve pointed out before the only big chance he has missed before the last six - seven games was the free header in the FA Cup. And there are plenty of posts here explaining the contributions he made even though he didn’t score.
I’m really curious: Why do you still think he was “poor”?
Deserved criticism?
No, what he actually deserved was your patience.
Perhaps it's you that needs to grow up?
Do we not give young players time anymore?Some of his play deserved criticism, yes. Why? Is he beyond it?
Any whys that pal?