Subbing him off changed feck all.
We got worse after he came off. The stick this lad is getting is ridiculous.
Subbing him off changed feck all.
Abysmal striker. £70m Weghorst.
It actually got worse. Haha. Yet he's the problem apparently. People on here do not live in reality.Subbing him off changed feck all.
ln what world is that true?Awful today and contributed nothing again, should have had 2 goals in the first half but ended up with none and was rightly dragged off after 57 minutes.
Hopefully he is dropped for the next game as even Joe Hugill or Charlie McNeil would offer more
Weghorst was more of a nuisance!He’s not even a nuisance anymore… I remember the game against Arsenal where he was competing for every ball and gave Gabriel a tough time, but now he just joggs a bit and gets outmuscled/outjumped on every ball, his touch is shaky and he doesn’t make any runs.
I see that people still treat strikers as some stationary objects who stand in penalty box and ball must come directly to them.
Exactly. Good players stand out even in rubbish teams.‘No service for him’ is slowly becoming the new ‘We need a DM to unlock Pogba’.
While he can have more service, he’s been shite independent of that. Zero aerial presence, bad first touch and being a step behind the play is a consistent theme with him in the PL.
ln what world is that true?
The central striker in Rashford was even worse than he is. The team is clearly missing a central striker than can play at this level as it was last season.I feel for Hojlund. He went off today and what changed? Did the team suddenly start playing well with a different central striker? This team simply doesn't know how to use a #9. Could be Hojlund could be Van Nistlerooy. Easier to get service at closing time in a packed pub.
Even if we're kind enough to give you the Antony cross, where are you getting 2?This one
Even if we're kind enough to give you the Antony cross, where are you getting 2?
He also wasn't worse.I get that Højlund is a big disappointed, but the rose tinted glasses for Weghorst here are kind of hilarious. He was certainly no better.
JfcThe one where Bruno played right to his feet in a great position to score and he let it role straight past him
Wasn't just Weghorst though. Last season's side was a very different team. Literally.We were more of a functional team with Weghorst up top.
He was no worse and was a loan who didnt cost us 72mI get that Højlund is a big disappointed, but the rose tinted glasses for Weghorst here are kind of hilarious. He was certainly no better.
Not really. The main difference is we had an inform Rashford. Our attack was still poor and we had negative goal difference for most of the season. Signing Hojlund as the only front 3 signing was a quite obvious mistake.Wasn't just Weghorst though. Last season's side was a very different team. Literally.
We had Shaw, Martinez and Varane starting fairly consistently. Had none of that to date. Casemiro and Eriksen starting regularly. None of that to date. Add that to an inform Rashford.Not really. The main difference is we had an inform Rashford
At what point do we need to have a inquest into how we've managed to spend over £100m on two players from Atalanta with less than 2000 Serie A minutes between them?
Young enough to come good eventually, sure, but that really doesn't help us or them in the immediate future.
He's shite.Richarlison was a better fit for us.