Richarlison was a better fit for us.
And we still had negative goal difference for most of last season with Rashford as the only attacking player who looked like he could get a goalWe had Shaw, Martinez and Varane starting fairly consistently. Had none of that to date. Casemiro and Eriksen starting regularly. None of that to date. Add that to an inform Rashford.
Even a player like Cunha, who currently has some big deficiencies, would have been a waaaay better signing than Hojlund. At the very least he's a genuinely elite ball carrier - something we're desperate for - a very good passer, uses his physicality really well and is one of the best pressing forwards in Europe. A lot more obvious qualities to build on than Hojlund has.
From an attacking perspective, yes. Though we functioned far better as a team last season. That was largely due to several players who have been consistently unavailable for us this season.And we still had negative goal difference for most of last season with Rashford as the only attacking player who looked like he could get a goal
Ive been talking about the attack quite obviously in the striker thread…From an attacking perspective, yes. Though we functioned far better as a team last season. That was largely due to several players who have been consistently unavailable for us this season.
Exactly. Good players stand out even in rubbish teams.
That was his fifth or sixth goal in the league now...
First class kneejerk caf. Whoever's scored in the last few minutes is indeed the player to fix us.
The original post I replied to stated that the team functioned better with Weghorst up top. I merely commented that there are many contributing factors, not just Weghorst.Ive been talking about the attack quite obviously in the striker thread…
Dreamland for us from a striker.That was his fifth or sixth goal in the league now...
Fair enough. I assumed they were also talking about the attackThe original post I replied to stated that the team functioned better with Weghorst up top. I merely commented that there are many contributing factors, not just Weghorst.
Richarlison was a better fit for us.
Yeah but he is 47 years old so we can give him a passEven Ruud Van Nistelrooy would look bad in this team.
To be fair, that's the same amount Garnacho and Antony combined gave Hojlund today.Yeah but he is 47 years old so we can give him a pass
Yeah but he is 47 years old so we can give him a pass
Of course he wasn't better. But he wasn't worse either. Which is damning thing when you consider 72 mil difference.I get that Højlund is a big disappointed, but the rose tinted glasses for Weghorst here are kind of hilarious. He was certainly no better.
Is he actually? What is so top about him which tells you that he will score 20 goals per season?Poor kid. He’s a top talent and in a proper team would be scoring goals already. He’s been set up to fail by a shocking team, poor supporting cast and a fanbase who can’t get behind their players. Seriously hope this club doesn’t bring in any more talented players until the culture of fixed too to bottom because it’s career suicide!
Those of them who are good enough don't either want to come or want over 500k per week wages after 100m+ transfer fee + nothing says they will be a instant Robin van Persie like success either.A lost little boy.
We're such a stupid club. We spent years buying ancient past it and not good enough strikers; Cavani, Ronaldo, Ighalo, Weghorst.
Then we go the exact opposite route. A very young, completely unproven player tossed into the lion pit.
God forbid we just buy a good solid striker in their mid to late 20s. Nah, that would be too fecking sensible.
Of course he wasn't better. But he wasn't worse either. Which is damning thing when you consider 72 mil difference.
We do but don’t say it too loudlyWe play better with Martial
Yeah might injure his earsWe do but don’t say it too loudly
Thing is, we didn’t need a RVP quality player or to splash 100m. There were sensible options around - Cunha quoted before, Solanke that I mentioned still before his goals tonight - they were just not flashy enough for us.Those of them who are good enough don't either want to come or want over 500k per week wages after 100m+ transfer fee + nothing says they will be a instant Robin van Persie like success either.
He’s strong, quick and his movement is actually very good. He showed that in the champions league and in his early league form. Clearly he’s lacking abit of confidence now and he’s playing in a terrible team with zero service. From what I’ve seen so far (very limited chances) he also looks a very good finisher, but we don’t truly know because he’s had literally no chances.Is he actually? What is so top about him which tells you that he will score 20 goals per season?
He started the season with a spark, but slowly started fading. It's not easy for someone his age to deal with this, but at the moment he's very poor.