Who was the Liverpool fan who was on here repeatedly refusing even the vague notion that he would go this summer?
Probably feels a tiny bit silly now, as the best result is he does go, and for huge money.
Otherwise you have him hanging around gutted, probably a bad influence, and you have a heck of a job getting him back on side
Sigurdsson and Walker were better than Martial last season.Your opinion of Martial's talent is funny.
IIn a world where sigurdsson and walker is going for 50m, martial is worth more despite last seasons dissapointment.
NO way is Coutinho worth twice + more than Martial.
Davidson Sanchez from the dutch league is going for 45m pound. Am pretty sure United won't even sell as this market will get even worse.
Signing squard players is now 50m pounds.
We spent 35m up front and the rest is add ons right?Why would we sell Martial at a loss?
Yeah. We've paid €60m so far.We spent 35m up front and the rest is add ons right?
We sold Depay, Schneiderlin and Di Maria at cut prices.Yeah. We've paid €60m so far.
Sigurdsson was better than Micki last season, is he worth more than him?Sigurdsson and Walker were better than Martial last season.
Because none of them did well here. Martial was one of our best players in his first season and is still just 21.We sold Depay, Schneiderlin and Di Maria at cut prices.
Martial hasn't done well here. Not "60m pound well" anyway.Because none of them did well here. Martial was one of our best players in his first season and is still just 21.
Transfer fees aren't always to do with how talented a player is.Sigurdsson was better than Micki last season, is he worth more than him?
Football wasn't invented last season.
I'm not? Still makes no sense to sell Martial at a loss.Martial hasn't done well here. Not "60m pound well" anyway.
He scored the other day so I wouldn't sell him this window but let's not act like he was ever absolutely outstanding and would command a 120m fee. That's delusion.
It looks like he might not feature as a starter in Mourinho's team.I'm not? Still makes no sense to sell Martial at a loss.
That's a joke offer considering they got the €222m, everybody is aware there are in a very bad situation and desperate.
I'd tell them €120m without any addon BS or feck off.
He could be a Utd player for 10 or more yearsIt looks like he might not feature as a starter in Mourinho's team.
Like I said, he did good against West Ham so we'll see what happens tomorrow. If he's not gonna play every game, I don't see the point in wasting him on the bench when we could get our money back. Let's face it, Mourinho didn't sign him after all.
You may have said this already, but what do you think is the correct price for him? Someone here said 82+36 (addons) is what was offered. What would be the price where you'd want to sell at?
Barca having an extra €222mil in the bank is irrelevant in regards to if their offer for Coutinho is enough or not. It's not like they would offer more for him than they think he is worth even if they had €2bil to spend on transfers.
I'm supporting Liverpool in this. They don't want to sell and they shouldn't. Let him rot in the reserves. Players need to respect their freaking contracts.
Problem is that Liverpool will get mugged as it is. Too late in the window and other clubs would know that he just received wads full of cash.Get Draxler and two defender. Jheeze how stupid is that club.
I'm supporting Liverpool in this. They don't want to sell and they shouldn't. Let him rot in the reserves. Players need to respect their freaking contracts.
Problem is that Liverpool will get mugged as it is. Too late in the window and other clubs would know that he just received wads full of cash.
They are paying for potential. We are at a premium to charge what ever we want cause we are talking about how the player is going to turn out in the "future". 50m is nowhere that fee for Martial.What? Martial won't go for that fee. 50m tops.
Why £120m though? Why not £110m or £130m?£120m cash, no add ons and we simply can't refuse. Anything else and we can easily make the no deal call. Is he worth that? No way.
I am enjoying both those scenarios though.Yeah they would but similar to Barca, they've got no choice but to spend the money and if you use the Andy Carrol logic. It's PSG's money. If the player wasn't too bothered if he stayed then yes refuse to sell.
Only flaw is that this Griezmann clause is £100m only in January. Right now, it's £200m.Barca: '£90m is our best offer'
LPool: 'Didn't you just sell Neymar for something stupid?'
Barca: 'Ok you win, £100m is our final offer'
LPool: 'I could have sworn it was like £200m?'
Barca: 'Si si but Paulinho...'
LPool: 'Understood. Neymar fee minus Paulinho fee = our fair and reasonable price'
Barcelona announce signing of Griezmann for £100m....
£120m cash, no add ons and we simply can't refuse. Anything else and we can easily make the no deal call. Is he worth that? No way.
KingMinger's idea about clubs spending power has been off for a while.Doubt that. Barca's revenue for 16/17 is €708M
85% of that would be in the region of €550/600M, seriously doubt Liverpool got anywhere close to that...