Paul Pogba image 6

Paul Pogba France flag

2018-19 Performances


View full 2018-19 profile

5.8 Season Average Rating
Appearances
47
Goals
16
Assists
14
Yellow cards
7
Red cards
1
Status
Not open for further replies.
People had the audacity to call me clueless when i said Pogba was a better passer than Scholes.
Im glad someone else has said it.

Oh come on you can't be serious. Play pogba in a two, we will see how well he can pass or playmake or actually influence the game against top opponents.
 
That run was a mark of a world class player, it took so much pressure off of us. He is such a talent

He's insanely good, now that José's gone himself, Lindelof, Herrera and especially Rashford are really showing their worth :)
 
Don’t get me wrong, of course he created goals. I just don’t think he was as prolific as Pogba, and nowhere on a level where we need to be looking at Pogba assists and saying ‘Scholes would be proud’. Like, that’s what Pogba does. Every game. And some of his passes are totally outrageous.

For me, he’s a better passer than Scholes, good as Scholes was. Scholes probably gave the ball away a bit less over shorter distance, as sometimes Pogba gets a little sloppy with it. That said, in terms of chance creation, I do think Scholes assists were a bit less ‘outrageous’, although he did create a few with real magic too. Also, any pass he could make, Pogba can make with his left foot for good measure.

As we’re enjoying videos. And this doesn’t include the last couple month’s specials.



Majestic. Always loved a long pass and Pogba is master of those.
 
Oh come on you can't be serious. Play pogba in a two, we will see how well he can pass or playmake or actually influence the game against top opponents.

To be fair, the main reasons for not playing Pogba in a two are defensive ones, not because he doesn’t have the footballing ability. Scholes wouldn’t play in a two in the current game either. Football has changed. If every team played a flat 4-4-2, then Pogba, like Scholes, could cope. As the game started evolving Fergie had Hargreaves or Park on one side more often than not to help out.
 
Apparently the cafe does not like that side of his game being pointed out. Part of the reason we are never convincing in big games. Matic looses his legs and energy and he falls back playing as a extra defender but still he contributes in our own penalty areas, while pogba is half arsed and moody doing that side of the game, Herrera can't do it alone and we see the whole team dropping so deep as a result .

Probably my favourite player but it really doesn’t sit right with me.
 
Am reading that right? 23 Goal/Assists in 29 games this season. Pretty good considering he played under Jose half the season.
 
If he doesn’t make team of the year this season the EPL has to have a good look at it self.
 
My favorite part of the clip people are using to slag lukaku is the person who passes to young is the same person who is first to the loose ball that Lukaku loses (pogba)
 
Annoys me when Pogba get criticised for sloppy plays sometimes as if other players don't play loose balls.

There is this narrative on the Caf that these other hyped up players by media have these flawless games therefore when Pogba comes out with a game where he's productive but makes some sloppy passes, people always come with comments about his game followed by "but" arguments.

It's actually amazing how little some on these boards watch the players they love over rating and have actually no sense or idea of what would constitute a world class player or midfielder. People will talk up the likes of Modric, Veratti etc yet will be the first to point out how Pogba made some sloppy passes or surrendered the ball which only further show and highlight how these same people don't watch the players they love praising from other teams but instead are just singing some tune they've heard from media and such.

Overall reading the Caf one would think these so called better midfielders than Pogba in other teams have 100% passing success rate or something.
He's a more purposeful passer than those players too which is what I like to see more than 100 passes at 99 ℅ accuracy.
 
People who claim he's better passer than Scholes need to calm down a bit.
 
I don’t think it was ‘quite a lot’. Think it was 2 or 3 times. In general, I think he kept possession very well in circumstances where many would have lost it. Due to his technical ability he can resist the pressure.

Maybe it was 2 or 3 times more than most players I remember seeing. He does it quite too often for my liking. If he can cut that out of his game he would be unplayable. And I’m talking about the easier passes to make not the Hollywood balls out wide etc
 
Our best player by a country mile. Then De Gea. Then the country mile, again.
A country mile better than De Gea? really?

I'd say:
Gen: none
T: De Gea, Pogba
WC: Rashford
VG: Martial
G: Matic, Herera, Shaw, Lindelof, Bailly, Lukaku, Lingard
M: the rest

Gen: generational player
T: talisman/ballon d'or level
WC: world class
VG: very good
G: good
M: mediocre
 
Annoys me when Pogba get criticised for sloppy plays sometimes as if other players don't play loose balls.

There is this narrative on the Caf that these other hyped up players by media have these flawless games therefore when Pogba comes out with a game where he's productive but makes some sloppy passes, people always come with comments about his game followed by "but" arguments.

It's actually amazing how little some on these boards watch the players they love over rating and have actually no sense or idea of what would constitute a world class player or midfielder. People will talk up the likes of Modric, Veratti etc yet will be the first to point out how Pogba made some sloppy passes or surrendered the ball which only further show and highlight how these same people don't watch the players they love praising from other teams but instead are just singing some tune they've heard from media and such.

Overall reading the Caf one would think these so called better midfielders than Pogba in other teams have 100% passing success rate or something.

Mr Mourinho? He was the one to critisize Paul for everything first and foremost :) From what I see at least, here the vast majority of people praise Pogba for creativity and attempts to set up chances. It goes without saying that not all the passes go through, but it's no problem as long as some do. Inability to make a key pass is critical, not 100% reliability in passing.
 
Am reading that right? 23 Goal/Assists in 29 games this season. Pretty good considering he played under Jose half the season.

Pretty good for sure, but it's better to look at stats under Ole as those are more representative. 11 goals/assists in 9 games is quite a respectable amount for a "virus".
 
Am reading that right? 23 Goal/Assists in 29 games this season. Pretty good considering he played under Jose half the season.
Official numbers (PL and UEFA) are a bit lower - only 9 assists combined. Probably don't count things like shots deflected to teammates or being fouled for penalty/free kick goals. 20 in 29 is still outstanding.
 
Last edited:
A country mile better than De Gea? really?

I'd say:
Gen: none
T: De Gea, Pogba
WC: Rashford
VG: Martial
G: Matic, Herera, Shaw, Lindelof, Bailly, Lukaku, Lingard
M: the rest

Gen: generational player
T: talisman/ballon d'or level
WC: world class
VG: very good
G: good
M: mediocre

S: This post.

S: Shite
 
People who claim he's better passer than Scholes need to calm down a bit.

At the very least, it's a debatable topic. Where I give the edge to Pogba is in the variety of passes he can do, especially in short range, near the box, where he can use a bit of skill or body feint to create space for a deadly pass in a way Scholes didn't. As far as long range passing, they're both incredible on their day.
 
I'm very happy with him at the moment. Keep producing the goods.
 
Apparently the cafe does not like that side of his game being pointed out. Part of the reason we are never convincing in big games. Matic looses his legs and energy and he falls back playing as a extra defender but still he contributes in our own penalty areas, while pogba is half arsed and moody doing that side of the game, Herrera can't do it alone and we see the whole team dropping so deep as a result .
The way I see it is that it's impossible to expect to carry us attacking wise, to create, run with the ball and expect him to be as optimal as he can be during defensive phases. I'm sure he'd love to help out the team more when it comes to that but there is a balance to be found and I'm pretty sure it's a struggle in each game.
 
People had the audacity to call me clueless when i said Pogba was a better passer than Scholes.
Im glad someone else has said it.
No chance. Pogba is a terrific creative passer but Scholes' decision making was better, his vision and map of the pitch even split seconds was vastly bette, and his passing was brilliant whether creative or otherwise. The likes of him and Xavi had that special weight and accuracy in all kinds of passes and not just the fancy ones.

Pogba is a terrific passer but a better parallel is KDB.
 
No chance. Pogba is a terrific creative passer but Scholes' decision making was better, his vision and map of the pitch even split seconds was vastly bette, and his passing was brilliant whether creative or otherwise. The likes of him and Xavi had that special weight and accuracy in all kinds of passes and not just the fancy ones.

Pogba is a terrific passer but a better parallel is KDB.

Not at 25 it wasn't.

People remember Scholes's career as though all 20 years was rolled into one. He was a totally different footballer at different stages of his career. He arguably didn't reach his peak until his early 30s.
 
Not at 25 it wasn't.

People remember Scholes's career as though all 20 years was rolled into one. He was a totally different footballer at different stages of his career. He arguably didn't reach his peak until his early 30s.

I agree with this. In my opinion, Beckham was a better midfielder than Scholes when they were young. Scholes however, turned into a completely new player as he approached 30 which highlighted many of his qualities that were not shown in his younger days.
 
Not at 25 it wasn't.

People remember Scholes's career as though all 20 years was rolled into one. He was a totally different footballer at different stages of his career. He arguably didn't reach his peak until his early 30s.

This is what I’ve been saying too. Retired players basically become a YouTube compilation.

The Scholes that scored loads of goals every year did not control football matches, and the one that controlled football matches didn’t score loads of goals. People want Pogba to be Zidane, Xavi and Kanté all at the same time. There would be no need for other midfielders if that was the case. A midfielder who has 23 G+A by the first week in February could never be the problem. If we are conceding too many or don’t have control, the other midfielders need to sort it out.
 
De Bruyne registered 12 goals and 21 assists (52 games) in his most productive season at City (last), that too, in a more functional and positive team.

Pogba has 11 goals and 12 assists in just 29 games this season in an absolute mess.

One is (was) considered the best in the league, the other never seems to get much praise.
 
People who claim he's better passer than Scholes need to calm down a bit.
His long range crossfield switches are as good as Scholes. The difference is Scholes knew how to dictate the tempo and keep the ball moving side to side whereas Pogba is better at finding the killer pass. And i would also say he's got more variety to his passing than Scholes. Crossfield pass, volley pass, through pass... he does it all
 
Not at 25 it wasn't.

People remember Scholes's career as though all 20 years was rolled into one. He was a totally different footballer at different stages of his career. He arguably didn't reach his peak until his early 30s.
I'd say he peaked in his late 20s (he turned 30 at the start of 04/05), but not disagreeing with the overall point of your post.
 
His long range crossfield switches are as good as Scholes. The difference is Scholes knew how to dictate the tempo and keep the ball moving side to side whereas Pogba is better at finding the killer pass. And i would also say he's got more variety to his passing than Scholes. Crossfield pass, volley pass, through pass... he does it all

I think the fact that Pogba can do it all on his left-foot too shouldn’t be underestimated.
 
Oh come on you can't be serious. Play pogba in a two, we will see how well he can pass or playmake or actually influence the game against top opponents.

As rozay said Pogbas passing isnt the reason he "cant" play in a two. Its because of his lack of positional discipline and defensive qualities.
Pogbas a better passer than Scholes.
And also im sure Scholes played a lot of games in a midfield three.
 
As rozay said Pogbas passing isnt the reason he "cant" play in a two. Its because of his lack of positional discipline and defensive qualities.
Pogbas a better passer than Scholes.
And also im sure Scholes played a lot of games in a midfield three.

Pogba a better passer than Scholes is a complete fiction. It's not even close.
 
His long range crossfield switches are as good as Scholes. The difference is Scholes knew how to dictate the tempo and keep the ball moving side to side whereas Pogba is better at finding the killer pass. And i would also say he's got more variety to his passing than Scholes. Crossfield pass, volley pass, through pass... he does it all
Yeah, both great passers but very different. If you want to control a game then Scholes is your man because his selection, intelligence and overall positional sense leave him in position to keep the team ticking and gain control of the match. If you're looking for explosive moments of magic and something out of nothing then perhaps Pogba's your guy. Not that either can't do what the other specialized in but they really play a lot differently. Overall Scholes could pass the football better I'd say. Pogba might have more highlight reel assists though by Scholes delivered some gorgeous passes deeper which may not have been assists but they opened the field up so much.

Scholes really had two phases. One was when he was closer to a number 10, often arriving late in the box and then as he slowed down, he used his knowledge and vision to be an equally valuable asset playing deeper and giving us far better control. Probably why we were consistently better in Europe during his later phase.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.