Because Scholes was a complete and utter legend of the game and one the greatest passers we've seen?
Pogba is brilliant. His creative passing is up there with anybody but Messi and possibly KDB right now. But Scholes was a better passer in general. The short little passes (not just the Hollywood ones), Scholes was considerably better. I mean it's not really close in that regard
I don’t think anyone sees Pogba pass it 5 yards and say ‘Scholes would be proud’. They say it after he makes passes like he did against Leicester, which he is simply better at than Scholes was.
Scholes was ‘better’ at passing the ball short though. Although there’s little wrong with Pogba’s short passing, it’s something he can occasionally be sloppy with, but it’s massively blown out of proportion on here. He regularly completes the large majority of his passes, and that is when they are looked at in their entirety too, short-passes, backheels, through passes etc. I’d imagine he’s mid-80s typically.
I don’t think ‘better passer in general’ is fair either. Scholes short-passing is better. Their respective roles also play a part in that tbh. I don’t think Jorginho is a ‘better passer’ than Pogba, although he probably completes more. Lindelöf probably has a higher accuracy.
And you kind of alluded to, but didn’t quite say, that Pogba is a better creative passer than Scholes was. That’s a part of passing too. Short passing deserves no extra weight IMO. The fact that Pogba is a sensational creative passer and a very good short passer doesn’t make him an inferior passer to a sensational short passer and a very good creative one.
His passes to Rashford against Leicester and Spurs shouldn’t be dismissed as ‘Hollywood’ either, they are very difficult and very important ones in the winning of the game. I agree that Scholes’ passing was key to us controlling the game, as he kept us in possession too, but both serve their purpose.