Ralph1386
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2008
- Messages
- 3,443
I wonder which of our rival clubs would consider offering Murtough the position he has at United if they were recruiting. There’s your answer.
How is McT easily valued above market when the only offer for him was at 30m?Great window. Definitely not a poor one as others are saying. They just want to blame the leadership for every fecking thing. Better to ignore them.
Signed 2 midfielders, 1 forward and a GK.
And No, not taking peanuts for McT or Maguire isn't a negative. Maguire wanted a pay off while McT is easily valued above 30m+ . That's the market.
I wonder which of our rival clubs would consider offering Murtough the position he has at United if they were recruiting. There’s your answer.
I would take Edu think hes doing a great jobFlip it. How many of the rivals clubs people would we want?
Mbappe market value is 150m + but that doesn't mean he is actually worth that amount. Because he is valued above market.How is McT easily valued above market when the only offer for him was at 30m?
Ask Arsenal fans how he did until last year. Murtough has been with us on a recruiting role doing the similar jobs of a DoF for years now. @Adnan has written detailed posts related to his experience.I would take Edu think hes doing a great job
Quite obviously take City and Newcastle DOFs too
Murtough is not a DOF we should stop pretending he is
Ask Arsenal fans how he did until last year. Murtough has been with us on a recruiting role doing the similar jobs of a DoF for years now. @Adnan has written detailed posts related to his experience.
Ofcourse you are free to "stop " pretending whatever you want, but let's not twist the facts for the sake of it.
8 is a bit high for incomings considering your question marks and fees paid for those players imo. Overall though I think a 6 is fairIncomings : 8/10(needed another CB, and question marks still on Hojlund/Mount)
Outgoings : 4/10(self explanatory)
Total : 6/10.
Who do you think he could have sold and should have sold given their fat wages?3/10.
Overpaid for our signings, can’t get rid of players who aren’t needed in the squad and most of the transfer outs were academy players sold on the cheap.
Took till the last day of the window and we’re still light in midfield and upfront.
Like I said before, he’a far better at briefing the press about what he’s doing or supposed to do than actually doing.
Ok, so the best solution that he has is to keep them in the squad and paying them full wages.Who do you think he could have sold and should have sold given their fat wages?
I’d easily take City’s DOF Txiki Begiristain and his team. He’s one of the main reasons Pep joined City. He had done excellent work at Barca. Doubt City would even look at Murtough if Txiki leaves.Flip it. How many of the rivals clubs people would we want?
We can't afford every to bolster in every area in this window. What do you bring a striker to the cost of? Amrabat? Then you'd have a big whinge about no second midfielder. You cant sit like you think this is football manager and we can buy for every squad weakness area amid of FFP.So ETH didn't want a striker in to replace Greenwood then, united paying some of his wages for a year was the answer.
I didn't try and miss out DDG, I thought that was obvious. It was well reported everywhere but if you want to rewrite narratives then go nuts.Love how you left out De Gea too, offering a contract and then taking it away, disgraceful. The Spurs reject and Evans not mentioned, you have the balls then to say it's a whinge. It's complete frustration at this stage, United should the best in class and have inept people in there role, another Summer window of these owners. Giving this role to someone who is not up to it.
The club is in a laughing stock position and Glazers are the problem. This thread is on how Murtough operated - and you can feel free to visit the OP for a better picture if you want.No positive spin for the absolute carnage at the end of the window. I blame a lot on his incompetent actions, second summer in. Club is an absolute laughing stock but some posters still refuse to admit it, because we need positivity. Some are calling it for what it is, while some bury there head in the and sand as usual.
Continue paying most their wages whilst they represent a mid table club, all whilst weakening our own squad as we hunt for multiple silverware? That sounds like bad idea.Ok, so the best solution that he has is to keep them in the squad and paying them full wages.
At the very least send them out on loan. We don’t need a bunch of players sulking on the bench with limited playing time which kills their value even more and ruining the mood at the club.
I’d easily take City’s DOF Txiki Begiristain and his team. He’s one of the main reasons Pep joined City. He had done excellent work at Barca. Doubt City would even look at Murtough if Txiki leaves.
I was hoping for a striker, GK, CM, backup striker and backup CB.
We have ended up with a GK and an expensive back up striker. The rest has been totally wasted imo.
Did we originally pay one for McT?It is from the point of view that there was no transfer fee originally.
And yet Chelsea managed to get the likes of Khoulibaly, Aubameyang, Havertz, Mount, Mendy, Loftus Cheek, and Pulisic out the door (many of whom were apparently on high wages.)Who do you think he could have sold and should have sold given their fat wages?
Because there was a market for them.And yet Chelsea managed to get the likes of Khoulibaly, Aubameyang, Havertz, Mount, Mendy, Loftus Cheek, and Pulisic out the door (many of whom were apparently on high wages.)
he didn’t do enough; you’re just sounding like an apologist. There was a market for Maguire and McTominay in the form of an offer from West Ham, which we should have accepted.Because there was a market for them.
You cant force players out the door if they don't want to leave.
The ones with comparable wages to Maguire ended up in Saudi. Those comparable with Baily aren't crocks.
Murtough did still get Telles, Elanga, Henderson and Fred out the door. You're acting like he did nothing.
What a load of bollocks.He did fecking shite, just like last summer. He's the first that needs to be shown the door by the new owners.
You would keep Murtough on?What a load of bollocks.
And this is a classic example of why we continually can’t get rid of players we don’t want and don’t intend to use.We can't afford every to bolster in every area in this window. What do you bring a striker to the cost of? Amrabat? Then you'd have a big whinge about no second midfielder. You cant sit like you think this is football manager and we can buy for every squad weakness area amid of FFP.
I didn't try and miss out DDG, I thought that was obvious. It was well reported everywhere but if you want to rewrite narratives then go nuts.
DDG staying was the plan but a series of calamitous performances in big games (West Ham away, Sevilla, FA Cup final being major ones) led to Ten Hag reprioritizing the areas he wanted to strengthen in the summer. It's worth noting Murtough did offer DDG a deal that better reflected his abilities, and lest just say theres a reason literally no club has gone in for him this window.
And you're whinging about what, Murtough trying to adapt to the reprioritized needs for the manager? feck off
The club is in a laughing stock position and Glazers are the problem. This thread is on how Murtough operated - and you can feel free to visit the OP for a better picture if you want.
Continue paying most their wages whilst they represent a mid table club, all whilst weakening our own squad as we hunt for multiple silverware? That sounds like bad idea.
Im not an apologist, I'm just calling out lazy posts like " there was a market for Maguire and he should have accepted".he didn’t do enough; you’re just sounding like an apologist. There was a market for Maguire and McTominay in the form of an offer from West Ham, which we should have accepted.
No, the big wages is why we can't force them off the books. And the big wages was a strategy of the Judge and Woodward era, not the Murtough one.And this is a classic example of why we continually can’t get rid of players we don’t want and don’t intend to use.
It’s mental that you think the same approach would change anything.
We should have paid whatever extra was needed to get him out - a strong DOF also would’ve gone full Don Corleone on his mercenary ass.Im not an apologist, I'm just calling out lazy posts like " there was a market for Maguire and he should have accepted".
In Maguires case, we did accept it. It's a good illustration of posters whinging for the sake of it.
Says a random keyboard warrior with no context or facts. I rest my case.Last year was Edus second year in the job.
Murtough was working at youth and womens football not in the mens game. Its totally different. Also he was not a DOF and he clearly does not have have the relationships required.
If they were in the same positions in any company they would been sacked already, they have failed in every metric possible, unless their metrics were to fail, if that’s the case they have exceeded expectations
And what, not fund Amrabat? Are you aware of our FFP situation?We should have paid whatever extra was needed to get him out - a strong DOF also would’ve gone full Don Corleone on his mercenary ass.