dichinero
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2013
- Messages
- 7,153
And probably be sent to the dungeon after a good game
And probably be sent to the dungeon after a good game
Bet he has a bag full of snacks there.Shaw 'requests' Mourinho meeting
Luke Shaw is back in the Manchester United squad for Tuesday’s game vs Everton after a clear-the-air meeting with Jose Mourinho, according to reports.
The 21-year-old’s future looked bleak under the Portuguese after he was slated for ‘the way he trains, the way he commits, the focus, the ambition’.
But, according to the Daily Mail, Shaw responded to being left out of Saturday’s draw with West Brom by holding a meeting with Mourinho at Carrington on Monday morning.
1. You talk to the player privately in one-on-one conversations.
2. You talk about it in a professional manner in front of the team.
3. You decide to let the player go, if he does not want to or cannot meet your demands.
He could have already done this throughout the season.
Again, could have done this throughout the season.
For someone who cost us 30 million pounds, I'd rather he tried one final public way to get the player to cut the crap instead of letting him go.
But when has this ever worked? And is it sustainable to publicly call out a player every two months so he tries hard, when he´s paid millions to do his job.
Just say the others in his position have trained better and leave it open to interpretation what exactly that means. Also protects the value of Shaw, when you sell him. Which then benefits Mourinho as he gets more money to spend on his type of player.
I thought that he misunderstood the question and assumed that the reporter was asking how come he couldn't get more out of an English International player. Which is why he stated that another English International (Joe Hart), didn't also make the cut at City and was offloaded on loan to an Italian club.I think he's using it as an example to show how committed an England international can/should be - Hart is out on loan in Italy of all places to salvage his career. Shaw is [supposedly] half-heartedly training.
Yeah I think that sounds right, my comments were before seeing the interview.I thought that he misunderstood the question and assumed that the reporter was asking how come he couldn't get more out of an English International player. Which is why he stated that another English International (Joe Hart), didn't also make the cut at City and was offloaded on loan to an Italian club.
Oh yes I'm sure Fergie was like that with all the players. Absolutely.
Or maybe he does it at every given opportunity because in all honesty, he has criticised players on more occasions than all the PL managers combined. He is the only manager that has a issue with players once a month.He could have already done this throughout the season.
Good on the lad. Desperate for him to make it here.
Agreed. It took fergie 4 years to win things as well. I think Jose will get at least 2 years and possibly 3, and by then I think he will have won the league at least once. If this has happened he will probably stay for a bit longer.Fergie is no longer here. People on here need to stop comparing everything to Fergie, those days are gone ffs. He's retired, move on with your lives.
Back in squad, doesn't really mean anything as someone with his apparent potential surely should be starting? I doubt he cares if he sits on the bench (and doesn't come on) or stays at home tbh
I really want to see him succeed so would hope he gets a chance - especially given Everton are without Coleman and an attacking LB should ease some pressure off Martial
Will be another massive blunder by Mourinho if he let Shaw go. I wouldn't be happy about it at all.
So you'd rather reward a player with bad attitude (apparently) over players with less ability?
How do you define best/ better players? Raw potential or performance?I want the best players to play, and I don't really believe that this is all about bad attitude. Shaw must have seen what happened to Martial and Mkhi, and he's had the chance to learn from that, if thats what's been keeping him him out of the side for so long. For me it seems to be more about him not having the kind of mentality that Mourinho prefers. After seeing that he's back in the squad after having a meeting with Mourinho, it kind of confirms that suspicion.
He was at lowry, so probably in the 18. He requested the meeting as per all the newspapers.
So Mourinho has played a blinder yet again.
His message is much needed kick up the big ass that Shaw has, and he is now is is bricking it that he'll be sold, so motivated like never before to deliver.
You guys are always convinced Mourinho is playing some some 8 dimensional game of chess. And this means if Shaw plays well from now on Mourinho will get all the credit.
Darmian and Blind are better LBs than Shaw anyway. Only a biased England fan would say otherwise. On the global scale, those two are certainly better.
I'd be interested in @noodlehair opinion on this latest episode. To be fair, he's been a critic for a long time.
You guys are always convinced Mourinho is playing some some 8 dimensional game of chess. And this means if Shaw plays well from now on Mourinho will get all the credit.
Will be another massive blunder by Mourinho if he let Shaw go. I wouldn't be happy about it at all.
If he did start putting in more effort, you don't think this will have had something to do with it?
Why would it be a blunder?
What has he done in the 2.75 seasons he has played for us? 8 good games?
If you bought a player tomorrow for £30M and he has only 8 good games in 3 seasons, I would classify that as an unmitigated disaster.
You're doing it wrong. They're allowed to be bad for about 6 seasons. Doesn't matter if we're terrible in those seasons either, it's all about looking to the future.
How do you define best/ better players? Raw potential or performance?
When 4 different managers identify fitness as a major flaw - and implore a change - maybe it's the player's professionalism that's the issue
Combo of that. Not saying he's performed very well this year when he's had the chance, but it's not like his competitors with supposed superior attitude has done it either. His potential as a LB is a hell of a lot bigger than Darmian's or Young's. Having him on the sidelines for months is clearly Mourinho's way of solving these matters he's got for whatever reasons, and I'm not a big fan of it so far. Like with most things, no one would probably care about this if we were performing better than we have, but it's hard to give credit to Mourinho for pulling stunts like these when we're that close to having yet another disasterous season by our standards.
If anyone could give me some examples of players from Mourinho's former clubs, who's been through this same treatment, and who's then shined again under Mourinho, I'd love to hear about it.
What is the benefit for Shaw of doing this publicly?
1. You talk to the player privately in one-on-one conversations.
2. You talk about it in a professional manner in front of the team.
3. You decide to let the player go, if he does not want to or cannot meet your demands.
What purpose does it serve to throw a sub-ordinate under the bus in public? It´s a poor management style.
Darmian and Blind are better LBs than Shaw anyway. Only a biased England fan would say otherwise. On the global scale, those two are certainly better.