Iker Quesadillas
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2021
- Messages
- 4,957
- Supports
- Real Madrid
but before he took over in his first season we were 11th..
You were 8th when Emery was fired and finished 8th under Arteta.
but before he took over in his first season we were 11th..
You were 8th when Emery was fired and finished 8th under Arteta.
The club needed completely rebuilding, but just so people can know some facts, Arteta so far in his reign:
City
Liverpool
Chelsea - 145 points
United - 142 points
Arsenal - 129 points
Spurs - 124 points
Leicester - 111 points
Since Arteta joined the club, he's 5th in the league on total points. No point looking back at times before that, the league had a lot less money in it whilst Wenger and SAF were around, now the whole league is more competative. This is after having to rebuild the club including getting rid of A LOT of players who were deadwood, and introducing a new style of play after the Wenger era. He's done this whilst also winning some silverware.
So, just to ask you, where exactly do you think Arsenal should be? To me, comparative to spending (we are 4th in spend during Artetas time, behind United, Chelsea and City) and the squad he picked up, Arteta has done a completely fine job. People on here just seem to have a go at him for absolutely no reason, even when the facts are saying he's done the exact job he was meant to and more considering the cup wins. He had a couple rough patches along the way, but considering his experience that was always going to happen. Now after 2 years we actually have some identity and a squad who seem to play together and for each other. If we manage to get top 4 this season, then he's done a fantastic job, and a domestic cup too would be the icing on the cake but we'll see on both of those.
And also, just looking at spend, we spent a fair bit of money on players who we expect to do well in the future, not instant success. I'm not expecting us to suddenly become good because we spent money, it's a long term project. Anyone who says, oh Arsenal spent loads of money so should be doing better isn't really looking at the profile of player. There's some exceptions, aka Pepe mostly though.
You were 8th when Emery was fired and finished 8th under Arteta.
What is purposely misleading is to use a caretaker's track record to pretend Arsenal were in a worse state than they actually were.
Wait, what?What is purposely misleading is to use a caretaker's track record to pretend Arsenal were in a worse state than they actually were.
Surely when judging Arteta the relevant fact is where Arsenal were when Arteta took over.
Yes. We are talking about where Arsenal were as a club. There is no single, 'objective' answer to that question.
Me and others are saying that long-term metrics such as "Arsenal's league placement in the previous season" or "Arsenal's league placement over the previous 3 seasons" are a good answer to 'where Arsenal were as a club'. Someone else is saying that an instantaneous metric such as "Arsenal's league position the minute Arteta was hired" is an appropriate metric.
I disagree that it is appropriate metric because instantaneous metrics are incredibly volatile. For example, if I used an instantaneous metric, I could argue that Arsenal, as a club, were a relegation-level team on the 28th of August. That is, objectively, true: they were 20th on the table. Does that mean Arteta has turned a relegation-level team into a top 4 contender?
It was widely argued that Ole should not have been given the permanent manager job in his first half-season, given that they ended up finishing 6th. There was no clear consensus that he'd done a good job.So are we saying Ole didn't do a good job in the first couple of seasons because Mourinho finished 2nd at Man Utd the season before?
Look, if you want to believe that finishing 8th rocks because the team was in 12th place for two seconds, you can. I'm glad that works for you. Maybe there's a lesson there for the rest of us about finding joy in life so easily.
Look, if you want to believe that finishing 8th rocks because the team was in 12th place for two seconds, you can. I'm glad that works for you. Maybe there's a lesson there for the rest of us about finding joy in life so easily.
The penalty kick has won trophies all over the world. Why should it not count for Arteta and Arsenal?So he's better than Ole because of a penalty kick?
You do realise that we can read what was being discussed, right?Yes. We are talking about where Arsenal were as a club. There is no single, 'objective' answer to that question.
Me and others are saying that long-term metrics such as "Arsenal's league placement in the previous season" or "Arsenal's league placement over the previous 3 seasons" are a good answer to 'where Arsenal were as a club'. Someone else is saying that an instantaneous metric such as "Arsenal's league position the minute Arteta was hired" is an appropriate metric.
I disagree that it is appropriate metric because instantaneous metrics are incredibly volatile. For example, if I used an instantaneous metric, I could argue that Arsenal, as a club, were a relegation-level team on the 28th of August. That is, objectively, true: they were 20th on the table. Does that mean Arteta has turned a relegation-level team into a top 4 contender?
That’s your “instantaneous metric”. The rather obvious point being made is that if we’re going to use starting league position as a data point (your data point - I might add) to analyse Arteta’s performance it makes sense to use Arsenal’s league position when Arteta started. You know, as opposed to when Ljungberg started his six game Caretaker stint where he only won one game.You were 8th when Emery was fired and finished 8th under Arteta.
Arteta was manager when Arsenal plunged to the bottom so that analogy makes no sense. But when he took over from Ljungberg they were 10th and finished 8th.Yes. We are talking about where Arsenal were as a club. There is no single, 'objective' answer to that question.
Me and others are saying that long-term metrics such as "Arsenal's league placement in the previous season" or "Arsenal's league placement over the previous 3 seasons" are a good answer to 'where Arsenal were as a club'. Someone else is saying that an instantaneous metric such as "Arsenal's league position the minute Arteta was hired" is an appropriate metric.
I disagree that it is appropriate metric because instantaneous metrics are incredibly volatile. For example, if I used an instantaneous metric, I could argue that Arsenal, as a club, were a relegation-level team on the 28th of August. That is, objectively, true: they were 20th on the table. Does that mean Arteta has turned a relegation-level team into a top 4 contender?
He has done a good job with cleaning up the ageing and high wage squad replacing them with British core players. It's looking like we will replace Auba,Xhaka and Lacazette over the summer which will be good for club on a longer run. The squad he inherited was a mess and he has struggled a lot, not saying he is perfect but he has done an ok job for steadying the ship.
I think he plays an important role for Arteta's system. I just don't see Arteta will sell him unless Xhaka wants out. I hope Lacazette will renew his contract too so he can give us option up front. His link up play is very good. Hopefully the club can agree a 2 year deal with him, but I believe Lacazette is looking for a longer deal else where.Xhaka out of Arsenal, what a glorious day that will be.
That’s your “instantaneous metric”. The rather obvious point being made is that if we’re going to use starting league position as a data point (your data point - I might add) to analyse Arteta’s performance it makes sense to use Arsenal’s league position when Arteta started. You know, as opposed to when Ljungberg started his six game Caretaker stint where he only won one game.
Will be surprised if they don't make it to EL this season tbf. Leicester have been atrocious, WHU are not in the best of form and even though I expect United and Spurs to finish above Arsenal, for Arsenal to finish below WHU (who are the only other realistic contender for top 6), it would require Arsenal to go into a lower half team form here onIf Arsenal somehow don't make it into the Europa League this season then by definition he will not have turned anything around.
Where exactly do I think Arsenal should be? Better than 8th place in the league, that’s for damn sure. Which is where they’ve finished under Arteta. Twice in a row.
You can spin it whichever way you want but he’s consistently steered Arsenal to a league position that is well below expectations for a club that size. That’s the simple fact that the Arteta fan club are bizarrely intent on ignoring. I remember at the end of last season there was all this bollox about their “points since Christmas” and how this meant they were finally mixing it with the big boys.
Sure enough, they have a shocking start to this season proving they’re once again miles off the pace (with Spurs and United firing managers who had a similar start) but all it takes is a few wins in a row for the revisionism and hubris to kick into gear again. Rinse and repeat.
My lesson for you would be to check your house for lead paint
Id say they're where we were a decade ago. No trophies and all that false hope disappearing by Christmas. The only difference being their football is shite.You don’t rate Arteta, I get it. Time will tell if you’re proven right or not. However, from my perspective, there’s currently much to be positive about. The team is playing consistently with much energy and our players are generally young with much room for further improvement. So, I’m optimistic that we will certainly finish in the top 6 and who knows, maybe even better than that. The club is also looking to strengthen the team.
I have no idea whether Rangnick will turn your current squad into world beaters but based upon their performances to date, I doubt it.
Maguire, Lindelof, AWB, Fred, McTominey and Martial are not good enough. Both Rashford and Greenwood seem to have lost confidence not getting enough playing time up against a 34 and a 36 year old who’ve seen better days.
In terms of where you are, I’d say you’re 2 years behind Arsenal.
In terms of where you are, I’d say you’re 2 years behind Arsenal.
At least the game in hand and we will be above you excuse isn’t possible anymore.
Id say they're where we were a decade ago. No trophies and all that false hope disappearing by Christmas. The only difference being their football is shite.
In terms of where you are, I’d say you’re 2 years behind Arsenal.
And statements like that are why folk have a go at giddy Arsenal fans.
Tbf it wasn't delusion when Ferguson was manager. But yeah assuming we'll win 3 games in hand these days is pure lunacy.The biggest self delusion in football is the belief you’ll win your games in hand…
I think he plays an important role for Arteta's system. I just don't see Arteta will sell him unless Xhaka wants out. I hope Lacazette will renew his contract too so he can give us option up front. His link up play is very good. Hopefully the club can agree a 2 year deal with him, but I believe Lacazette is looking for a longer deal else where.
My metric to judge Arteta is not their position when Emery was fired. It is Arsenal's performance in previous seasons, their track record, and their expectations as a club. If I judged Arteta by Emery's final position, I'd be doing him a favor.
It doesn't make sense to use their league position when Arteta started or when Emery was fired. Nobody believed that Arsenal were, on underlying quality, the 8th or 10th or 12th best team in the Premier League when Arteta was appointed. That's why they fired the manager.
The fundamental claim here is, "Arsenal were in really bad shape." The evidence being offered is "they were 11th or 12th for a few weeks." That is weak evidence for the claim. Football teams have periods of bad form; they are not necessarily a reflection of their underlying quality. A manager hired mid-season is almost certainly taking over a period after a period of bad form. If you judge the manager based on where the team where when they took over (or whereabouts), you are very likely to be using outliers as your reference point.
Nobody actually judges managers this way. Two years into Xavi's stint as manager of Barcelona, 'league placement when he was hired' isn't going to be anywhere on your mind. You're going to judge him based on the standards of your club, previous league finishes under other managers, and take context into account.
Xhaka is very limited, if Arsenal have CL level ambition then will move him over the summer. Laca is not extending his contract, also he isn't a 20 goal a season striker which Arsenal needs desperately.
Striker & CM are two areas Arsenal need upgrades to challenge consistently for top 4.
I would love to replace Xhaka with Kalvin Phillips and I’d snap up Greenwood if he can’t get game time at OT