passing-wind
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2013
- Messages
- 3,041
Think it will either go really well or really bad. I don't think there's any middle ground with Artetas appointment that's just a gut feeling.
poch truly lifted spurs to a serious club. Winning 1 cup and causing havoc won’t be worth it. If Mourinho gets his way his clubs will be filled with late 20s early 30s tall players with big contracts. Once he leaves it’s your mess
Yep. ClassicsYes and "I would rather qualify and get KOed in round of 16 of CL than winning Europa league".
May sound odd but you lot should sell Auba before his value goes down. I would even say sell Lacazatte and look to build a young squad. Martineli seems a good option to rely on, replace Auba or Laca with another striker and fix your defence.We spent around 180M in our front 3 to get a quick fix and win something. We failed miserably. Now we're making another gamble, and one that just cannot produce results before at least a year or two. We're gonna have to give Arteta time and be very patient; the issue is Aubameyang probably won't stick around for this little experiment.
For every one new manager that comes in and does really well there are many more who have utterly failed. As I've said I'll be interested to see how it goes but if I was an Arsenal fan I'd be absolutely furious at him even being seen as an option. I was cracking up at the thought of Eddie Howe getting the Spurs job when Poch left and he is vastly more proven that Arteta.
All is missing is GerardI am really getting old..Solksjaer at United, Arteta at Arsenal and Lampard at Chelsea
I am really getting old..Solksjaer at United, Arteta at Arsenal and Lampard at Chelsea
Seems to be a phase clubs are going through. Weird to have half the top six managed by recent(ish) former players.There are few clubs with managers who played for the clubs
Arsenal - Ljungberg, Arteta
Bournemouth - Howe
Chelsea - Lampard
Crystal Palace - Hodgson (academy player)
Everton - Duncan Ferguson
ManUtd - Solskjaer
Sheffield United - Chris Wilder
They could get relegated if going by current formDon't know what Arsenal fans are expecting, a miracle? This season is already a write off. The new coach should use the remaining half of the season to assess the state of the players and make decision before the summer, who fits his playing style or not, who can adapt or not, who stays or goes, and identify quality targets to bring in especially in midfield and defence. They are in a diabolical state as it is.
Who is worried about Arteta?
If my memory serves me correctly, he wasn't even that inspiring back then in Arsenal midfield.
To be fair, those that are calling the shots do not have an idea either. If they do, they do not need to keep sacking the managers that they hired.My point is that your (and my) risk and talent evaluations of managerial appointments are shit. You or I have no idea of what qualifications correlate to success on the job.
For me it's simple. Does Arteta have his UEFA badges? Does he pass the interview of the board, demonstrating that he understands what is required, and accepts the constraints and challenges of this specific position? If so, he's qualified.
Your (and other's) talk about trophies won and "experience" matters not one bit. There are plenty of examples (including Mourinho) where that experience mattered for little at the end of the day. There are examples of managers that came in with zero experience and did decent jobs. So let's drop the pretense of there being some gold managerial experience standard that Arteta isn't meeting. It's all bullshit.
With Liverpool and City as good as they are right now, this is the best chance for clubs to do the high risk high reward thing, which makes Levy's decision to appoint Jose a bit bizzare.It makes sense to be honest. Putting in ex-players is the only way big clubs in England can justify going for unproven names especially with the money involved. Also I think that the ex-players might get more time and patience from the fans as well to get things right and not lose support during a bad run (which most up managers go through).
With Liverpool and City as good as they are right now, this is the best chance for clubs to do the high risk high reward thing, which makes Levy's decision to appoint Jose a bit bizzare.
There's no point appointing win now "proven" managers if the odds are you won't win now, so why not turn a negative into a positive and build something a bit more sustainable?
This could go laughably wrong, but equally it could turn into just the reboot they needed.
Almost like the clubs have gone on a rebound after falling out with a continental manager. I'm sure Pep and Zizou have given clubs confidence as well in hiring ex players with limited experience although Ole has been a manager for 10 years at a lower level.
Good post, and I'd also be optimistic at this appointment if I was a gooner. Of course there's a chance he may not turn out well, but I don't see how he could be any worse than Emery. Do you see the owners spending big for him or are they going to do it cheaply and hope he develops players?
- He captained Arsenal and ended our trophy drought. He's shown that he can lead and he's not just a number 2 or someone who works behind the scenes.
- He worked with Pep and surely picked up a few things from him.
- He was Pep's trusted advisor. Pep doesn't mess about and he wouldn't put so much trust in someone inexperienced unless he has something about him.
- He helped City win the league. He has seen what it takes for a manager to lead a team to a league title.
- He worked with world class players and winners so he has experience in dealing with big personalities.
- Arteta has always been spoken about as a potentially great manager and following his career path it's clear that he had his sights focused on a job as a manger. He's not someone who stumbled onto a job in management.
- Highly experienced premier player and knows all about the league.
- He was a very clever player and these type of players usually do well in management (e.g. Simeone, Guardiola, Zidane)
The alternatives are Allegri and Ancelloti
At Juventus Allegri lived off the team Conte built. He inherited a team that won the Seria A 3 years in arow.
At AC he won the league in the 1st year where there were no other challengers Rafa was too busy dismantling the team that Jose built at Inter and Juve were still recovering from the match fixing scandal. He didn't win anything in the following 3 years and ended up getting fired with AC sitting 11th in the league. Also, he has no experience in the premier league and apparently his English was so poor that he let his agent do the talking during the interview with Arsenal. For me he's just another Emery.
Ancelloti is a great man manager who does well with great players. Not sure if he's up for a rebuilding job and his methods might be outdated. Wouldn't have minded him taking over till the end of the season to steady the club but I'm not sure he would go for that.
Sure, Arteta is a gamble given the lack of experience but at the moment he's the best option and could introduce fresh ideas. Guardiola and Zidane barely had any experience when they started management and they did well so it seems pretty premature to completely rule Arteta out.
You regularly see city have 70-80% possession, yet commit more fouls than the opposing team. They also take turns fouling the opposing players, a slight nudge, a shove, making it difficult for the referee. Think even Pellegrini complained earlier this year, Mourinho when he was managing us.That style of play is fecking annoying. Yet again players and managers pushing the rules and making life hard for refs yet always the first to moan when it's done to them.
Time for sinbins for professional fouls.
Success with longevity. Not necessarily 20 years worth, but maybe 5–10 years.What's the high reward?
That style of play is fecking annoying. Yet again players and managers pushing the rules and making life hard for refs yet always the first to moan when it's done to them.
Time for sinbins for professional fouls.
Success with longevity. Not necessarily 20 years worth, but maybe 5–10 years.
Hiring Mourinho was a massive risk.
Actually, how does the Caf evaluate the risk of a managerial appointment?
Not sure where invoking SAF comes into this. High risk high reward and low risk high reward are not mutually exclusive, if that's what you're getting at.SaF wasnt a high risk though. Considering what he has won before he comes to united
Not sure where invoking SAF comes into this. High risk high reward and low risk high reward are not mutually exclusive, if that's what you're getting at.
Its not so much that they can last 20 years but up and coming managers can if selected right be top appointments.I just dont understand this fascination with long term. I bet saf didnt even plan beyond 3 years let alone 5 or 10.
You managed what's ahead of you, plan sideways for the future if you can, then see how it goes from there.
The notion that if you employ young and unproven and they'll somehow becomes the next 10 years one club manager is weird.
Even pep who's a thru and a thru barcelona fans and one career man only lasted 4 years at barcelona.
The only time a manager stays 10 plus years is only when they're on their comfort zone, not good enough to push on and too good to get the boots like Wenger and moyes. And yes, i know saf exist, but he's an anomaly
Its not so much that they can last 20 years but up and coming managers can if selected right be top appointments.
The reality is Arsenal are not challenging for the title anytime soon. What's the point of getting in an Ancelotti, Allegri or Jose if the league is out of reach? You appoint those type of managers to get over the line for big titles. Arteta if he's anything like Pep will build a sustainable way of playing that even if he doesn't turn out to be good enough to reap the rewards himself he will leave a healthy squad for a manager capable of taking the next step.
Who is worried about Arteta?
If my memory serves me correctly, he wasn't even that inspiring back then in Arsenal midfield.
Guardiola was never a risk with the players he helped bring throughRight, because last time we passed on Arteta for an established coach, it turned out so well for us. The fact that you're comparing Arteta to Adams, Merson and Henry suggests that you know very little about him. I recognize that it might not work out but Arteta has shown a lot of promise and has been talked about by Wenger, Guardiola and Pochettino as potentially being a world class manager which is not something that I've heard being said about Adams, Merson or Henry.
Wasn't Guardiola a gamble for Barca or Zidane for Madrid? Last time we took a massive gamble on a coach, it got us 3 premier league titles, 7 Fa cups and propelled the club into the top tier of world club football. I'm actually quite excited by this, it could turn out to be a great move or it could fail, but that you're already writing off Arteta simply because you've never seen him manage is pretty premature.
It's going to go really bad. There is no way on earth you can give a man with no managerial experience an appointment like this at a big club that is in crisis. What are the Arsenal board thinking of? $$$Think it will either go really well or really bad. I don't think there's any middle ground with Artetas appointment that's just a gut feeling.