It was a correct call and without the foul, it would probably been goal. I really don’t see where you are trying to go with this. That he should not make correct decisions if they have big impact? Not giving penalty would have had the same magnitude of impact
Where i was trying to go was obviously not that refs should avoid decisions with big impact on the game. Especially not when they are correct decisions, why in the world would that be my point? I just think refs should be consistent and not confusing. This guy, Oliver, I don't think has the personality of a good ref. We may disagree but i just don't see it.
Let me break it down for you then, this is Oliver:
When a player touches his shirt, its a red card. Headrubbing is allowed tho, if you are English.
When a player goes down easy, its simulation and a yellow card. Looking for the foul tho is different, that's just smart so is allowed and rewarded with penalty or freekick.
Light fouls are clearly allowed to let the game breathe on it's own. Not at the 94th minute tho, that's different, the time is up so the same rules doesn't apply anymore of course, players should know this and act very careful in the last minute.
How any player can follow this guy, i don't understand.
To be more clear about my point in the post you quoted. The reason I asked why you think the last call was more important than other decisions, is because if the last decision was right then a lot of his decisions was wrong earlier in the game. If he was to be considered consistent that is, but he is not. Because he is not trying to be, he is a ref that lives on making these types of decisions with total disregard of earlier incidents and context. (Not narrative, but context)
Has nothing to do with Juve, Buffon, Real or any sort of narrative like that. Not for me at least, I just want to hate on him a bit, because he always makes these calls and it comes with a cost so i don't like that people are buying into it