LDUred
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2019
- Messages
- 2,470
To me it feels like whatever was wrong with his hip has led to other problems with his leg, because the muscles there are obviously interconnected and compensate (in this case overcompensate) for his issues with hip mobility.That's strongly exaggerated. He was in Chelsea's first team for four years, and he basically didn't get injured at all in that time until the final three months when he had one pelvic injury. He took a month off, tried to come back but then had to go off for surgery as it wasn't healing.
Buying him on the back of that surgery does carry some risk of course, but he wasn't suffering a 'rapidly increasing amount of injuries in his last year or two'. It was four years of almost perfect fitness followed by one fairly serious injury. Unfortunately that one injury (or the surgery that it required) seems to have resulted in the absolutely worst-case scenario and destroyed him physically.
The better question is whether pelvic injuries and surgeries do carry a significantly higher risk of creating long term injury problems? Or if there was something unique about this one that the medical should have picked up? If either of those are true, then that's definitely something to hold against the club. But if not, then we've just been incredibly unlucky as the vast majority of injuries and surgeries don't result in anything like this.
Yes, he was largely injury free, but he was playing a lot of games for Chelsea and also for England. Over that four year period it seems like his body has not had enough recovery time with those 200 + competitive games and training.
We've bought a player who appears chronically injured, sadly. I feel that the hip injury should have been analysed in more detail and as having the potential to lead to resultant muscle problems.