Both these bolded points are 100% wrong. If you think they are correct, then you have to accept that it’s the clubs fault that Greenwoods character is lacking with regards to how he treats women.
The clubs number one job is to raise, train and educate young boys as they become men. That’s not to say we’re a school. But personal and professional development go hand in hand. The more well rounded an and well cared for a child is, the better they learn. Countless studies support this.
It’s also certainly not the job of parents to educate a child with regards to;
-How it feels to be a millionaire at 16
-How it feels to be surrounded by older men 24/7, with close to no women present, and certainly none your age.
-How having money young will open up doors that should (and will) remain closed for everyone you go to school with.
-How his schoolmates will engage with him in a different way to his peers.
-How the media and ‘fame’ will affect him.
-And, most crucially, how girls and latterly, women, will engage with you.
It’s no criticism of you, but there’s really a lot in this. Kids in football academies now are taught about the perils of social media in a way that school kids are not. Mainly as asset protection, because capitalism, but also base level of care.
Put it this way; If I’d dumped one million pounds into your bank account at 15, and given you a near guarantee that another £10-100m would be following it, with women pursuing you daily, through a device you carried at all times, and that women would want you for no reason other than who you are… how much would you listen to schoolteachers? How much do you listen to a parent telling you to ‘Be careful’?
Without those early adolescent years of self doubt, working your way through a co-ed school, finding your path through puberty, becoming a man… do you honestly think you’d pop out a well rounded man with a respect for women? It’s impossible for these kids. Especially those with almost guaranteed stardom ahead.
Beyond that, it’s 100% a clubs role to provide spaces for these kids to grow together. To have open forums where they learn to report on each others behaviour. To first of all understand what bad behaviour is, and then instill confidence in them to report when they see bad behaviour amongst boys and young men around them.
I’m tempted to just post the Daniel Sloss explainer at this point. Greenwood doesn’t just ‘become’ an abuser. There are hundreds, if not thousands of points of incidence along the way that lead to it. Loads of people would have seen behaviour they’d not have tolerated towards their sister, or friend. That can be as generic as how someone talks about women.
It’s a giant problem in sport. Football has a really dark spot inside it and through agents, clubs, and money, lots of it never becomes public.
So when a case so shocking comes to light, it fcuks me off to see people take a stance that puts money above all else (not saying that’s you).
If we made it a site condition that before anyone posted in this thread they had to listen to the audio and look at the photos, before hitting post?… this thread would be empty.
It’s not really about there being ‘dark forces’ at the heart of the club. We do wonderful things for so many kids. Most kids we never even see play. It’s a wonderful thing and I’m immensely proud of it. But analysing the clubs role in one of its failed men, is normal. It should happen. I suspect that it has/does. But still we seek to profit from it.
Had the club whacked £1 on every ticket and announced ‘This is because we have made a financial decision to not profit from the sale of Mason Greenwood. We will continue to support the player in every way that he needs. We have also reviewed our internal processes and have brought external specialists in to talk to the young men at this football club on an ongoing basis’… who complains?
Yet the way we have handled it, profiting, not commenting, moving on and sweeping it under the rug? Truly awful.