Manuel Ugarte | Romano - he’s signed | Awaiting Club announcement

Status
Not open for further replies.


A full 90 compilation against a PL team, to give a more accurate idea of the type of player he is.

Ngl, he looks too limited to me. Similar to a Schneiderlin, great defensive stats, but perhaps not good enough at the highest level.

That was an awful setup from Enrique tbf in the game with 3 CFs, and Dembele and Zaire Emery playing like AMs. At times Ugarte was left 1v4.
 
If he allows our most technically gifted players like Mainoo/Bruno to flourish and do what they do best, he'll be a great addition.
 
No brainer until he gets upset for playing too little games and risks losing his spot in the WC squad in his second season. Mum starts complaining about the manager etc etc.. no thanks.

I feel like he’d be the new Sabitzer.. and look how few games he got.
Mainoo will need rest, Bruno will need rest, Ugarte will need rest. If you experiment in using Mainoo more forward when Bruno is rested, or against teams that you need so thing different, a Mainoo, Rabiot, Ugarte midfield would be strong. In that sense, even if he wasn’t starting, he could get near 30 starts a season with all competitions. Maybe he even starts over Ugarte for a bit. He could use learning skills from a very underrated technical DM, while still getting tons of playing time himself.

You want to get top 4, compete in two cups, and Europa League? You need at least 5 or 6 real quality midfielders. Rabiot is on a fee and wants YOU. I’d take that.

And Ugarte you absolutely take. Mainoo is the only “undroppable” player in your midfield right now for me.
 
I think people are getting a bit too wound up over this.

Yes, we would all like to have a Carrick/Busquets/Rodri in the team who can be the defensive base AND play mouth watering passes, but if no such player is readily available, that does not mean we should not try to upgrade the team in other ways. Last season the biggest problem with our midfield was how defensively open we were and how easy it was for teams to run through. If Ugarte can help make that better, even if he isn't a hugely 'progressive' passer, then I say he is definitely worth bringing in.
 
For those who have watched more of him - why is he a better fit for us than someone like Onana?
 
I'm all for him and think he's a profile we need. Is he THE ideal profile? Maybe not. But he can play at the highest level and be an absolute terrier out of possession. He can play in a 2. We will gain a lot of bite and speed in MF that we don't have. What we will lack is that calmness and vertical passing, which we might need to find more from Shaw, Martinez and Yoro.

I think we could be thinking about long term succession planning here, in a post-Bruno world for me we might play a 3. Mainoo, ball winner and tempo setter. Ugarte could be that ball winner. Sure we don't have the tempo setter yet, but we don't need to rush things.

Sign the right players as they come available and the results will follow.
 
I think people are getting a bit too wound up over this.

Yes, we would all like to have a Carrick/Busquets/Rodri in the team who can be the defensive base AND play mouth watering passes, but if no such player is readily available, that does not mean we should not try to upgrade the team in other ways. Last season the biggest problem with our midfield was how defensively open we were and how easy it was for teams to run through. If Ugarte can help make that better, even if he isn't a hugely 'progressive' passer, then I say he is definitely worth bringing in.

Especially in a context where last season's squad saw Casemiro, McTominay, Amrabat and Eirksen play the combined equivalent of 92+ full games in terms of minutes, at an average age of 29 years old. There's no shortage of scope to improve the team in what everyone at the club sees as a multi-year rebuild.
 
For those who have watched more of him - why is he a better fit for us than someone like Onana?

Last season we played a very high and aggressive press. Problems arose because the defensive line was very deep, meaning once the press was broken, teams were running at our back five almost unimpeded.

Clearly we are focusing on bringing in defenders who enable us to play a higher line and be more compact, condensing the play. Which is vital.

Ugarte excels at an aggressive, preemptive press. He steps up to intercept in passing lanes more aggressively than nearly every other player out there. He plays in midfield like Martinez does in defence. Looking to step forwards and take the ball before it reaches the opponent, and he does it very well. There’s a reason he’s been called the Uruguayan Kante. So in that regard he’s ideal for a high pressing team. Onana, by contrast, does more of his pressing once the opponent has received the ball. He doesn’t have the same level of anticipation.

In terms of deficiencies, they are fairly similar. I don’t think either are particularly great receiving it under pressure facing their own goal, but I think that is an area of weakness for Onana that is even more pronounced.

To be honest, there isn’t a huge difference between their levels, but having watched both a fair amount, I will tell you that I came away feeling that Ugarte is the better player. His energy is incredible and his technical skills, especially running with the ball, vastly overlooked. Onana has never been a player that I was worried on United missing out on.
 
Seen quite a few of his game compilations, and they are mostly similar. It could be a bad game, or it could be his median level.



There's a reason PSG want to get rid after only one year. We might be too eager to overlook his faults because he's our current flavour of the month/saviour/only reliable midfield transfer we have been linked to.

This looks better than the Newcastle and Milan games which were disasters for him, he was also only 20 against City tbf.



He looks genuinely good in this compilation against Spurs. If he comes though, he will need to tone down his aggression a bit. He doesn't have the same level of control as Martinez when going for strong challenges.
 
I think people are getting a bit too wound up over this.

Yes, we would all like to have a Carrick/Busquets/Rodri in the team who can be the defensive base AND play mouth watering passes, but if no such player is readily available, that does not mean we should not try to upgrade the team in other ways. Last season the biggest problem with our midfield was how defensively open we were and how easy it was for teams to run through. If Ugarte can help make that better, even if he isn't a hugely 'progressive' passer, then I say he is definitely worth bringing in.
My doubts are mainly because I'm not sure how good he is as a destroyer. Considering Ten Hag's system and the profile of our other midfielders, Ugarte needs to be especially good at this aspect.
 
My doubts are mainly because I'm not sure how good he is as a destroyer. Considering Ten Hag's system and the profile of our other midfielders, Ugarte needs to be especially good at this aspect.
Did you see his defensive stats for the last three seasons? About half of all the defensive parameters are at 99, others are not far away
 
Apparently we're willing to let Mount go too now. I wonder how much it would cost us to make Crystal Palace an offer they can't refuse for Wharton. I think he would be the perfect defensive partner for Mainoo.
 
Apparently we're willing to let Mount go too now. I wonder how much it would cost us to make Crystal Palace an offer they can't refuse for Wharton. I think he would be the perfect defensive partner for Mainoo.

Not sure where you got that from. I haven’t seen one credible, or half-credible suggesting we’ve given up on Mount after one injury ridden season.
 
Last season we played a very high and aggressive press. Problems arose because the defensive line was very deep, meaning once the press was broken, teams were running at our back five almost unimpeded.

Clearly we are focusing on bringing in defenders who enable us to play a higher line and be more compact, condensing the play. Which is vital.

Ugarte excels at an aggressive, preemptive press. He steps up to intercept in passing lanes more aggressively than nearly every other player out there. He plays in midfield like Martinez does in defence. Looking to step forwards and take the ball before it reaches the opponent, and he does it very well. There’s a reason he’s been called the Uruguayan Kante. So in that regard he’s ideal for a high pressing team. Onana, by contrast, does more of his pressing once the opponent has received the ball. He doesn’t have the same level of anticipation.

In terms of deficiencies, they are fairly similar. I don’t think either are particularly great receiving it under pressure facing their own goal, but I think that is an area of weakness for Onana that is even more pronounced.

To be honest, there isn’t a huge difference between their levels, but having watched both a fair amount, I will tell you that I came away feeling that Ugarte is the better player. His energy is incredible and his technical skills, especially running with the ball, vastly overlooked. Onana has never been a player that I was worried on United missing out on.
Good post well explained.
 
Apparently we're willing to let Mount go too now. I wonder how much it would cost us to make Crystal Palace an offer they can't refuse for Wharton. I think he would be the perfect defensive partner for Mainoo.
That bs rumour has already been squashed
 
Apparently we're willing to let Mount go too now. I wonder how much it would cost us to make Crystal Palace an offer they can't refuse for Wharton. I think he would be the perfect defensive partner for Mainoo.
Stop reading gossip
 
Personally i would go for Adam Wharton instead of Ugarte. More creative, more controlling and dictating the ball.

Plus Wharton is left foot and can be back up for Martinez as CB with left foot.

Like this :

Bissaka - Yory - Wharton - Shaw

If Shaw can play LCB and Wharton can it too in needed and crisis.

De Ligt + Ugarte = Adam Wharton

60 -70 mill euro for Ugarte vs 30 -40 mill euros for Adam Wharton. If it was me. I would go for Wharton


Wharton = playing more dominating and controlling against team that park the bus. The way Ugarte controlling and spreading the ball around is not the same as Wharton. Ugarte is most useful against top teams with high line.

Ideally it will be :

Wharton for Eriksen

Ugarte for Casemiro

But Wharton has top tackling and defensive ability too. Break up opponent attack:

https://www.whoscored.com/Players/430774/History/Adam-Wharton


Wharton had 3 tackles average in each game for Palace last season. Interception 1.3

Ugarte 3.9 tackles average and 1.6 interception.

So average on tackle lesser than Ugarte.

But with key passes. Ugarte 0.6 vs Wharton 1.3 in avg in key passes

https://www.whoscored.com/Players/408962/Show/Manuel-Ugarte

Like above. Adam Wharton is better with the ball and with the creative and offensive. When Ugarte had around avg 1 more tackle.

And if United and Ten Hag want to play proactive and dominating football. If only one of them. United need Wharton more thand Ugarte. A more complete cm player.
There is zero reality where Palace would sell Wharton for an easy 30m :lol:

Clubs in the league would be lined up for him if that were the case
 
Did you see his defensive stats for the last three seasons? About half of all the defensive parameters are at 99, others are not far away
They are quite good albeit in weaker leagues. He did disappoint massively in the CL last season defensively which is where my doubts are coming from.
 
I feel like this is De Light deal for Midfield - there is clearly a deal to be done, but we’re playing smoke and mirrors while working under the radar for a primary target.. could be another good week for transfers.

Camavinga?
 
I feel like this is De Light deal for Midfield - there is clearly a deal to be done, but we’re playing smoke and mirrors while working under the radar for a primary target.. could be another good week for transfers.

Camavinga?
Tchouameni?
 
we badly need a DCM....this kid fits the profile of what we want and what we need
 
The feeling on him in this thread seems to be we can do better,however the question is who?
 
I'm all for him and think he's a profile we need. Is he THE ideal profile? Maybe not. But he can play at the highest level and be an absolute terrier out of possession. He can play in a 2. We will gain a lot of bite and speed in MF that we don't have. What we will lack is that calmness and vertical passing, which we might need to find more from Shaw, Martinez and Yoro.

I think we could be thinking about long term succession planning here, in a post-Bruno world for me we might play a 3. Mainoo, ball winner and tempo setter. Ugarte could be that ball winner. Sure we don't have the tempo setter yet, but we don't need to rush things.

Sign the right players as they come available and the results will follow.

If we had a Modric/Scholes/Kroos type playmaker, hell even Eriksen in his prime...we wouldnt really be asking for a do it all DM. We need a DLP type DM because our other 2 midfielders arent necessarily great on the ball(Mainoo exception).

If we can get a CM in who is a proper ball player eventually(This season or next), I would be fine with a more destroyer type DM like Ugarte.
 
I feel like this is De Light deal for Midfield - there is clearly a deal to be done, but we’re playing smoke and mirrors while working under the radar for a primary target.. could be another good week for transfers.

Camavinga?

We aren't doing another yoro type deal unfortunately
 
I think the problem is that they allegedly want €70 million for him, so we would need someone who either has world class potential or is world class for that amount of money.
Ah of course we shouldn't go along with silly Everton pricing he's a EUR40-50M player.
 
That’s what I mean too. We have to move beyond transition footy and learn how to play football matches in the opponents half in congested spaces if we are ever to again become a great team.
Real Madrid doesn't play possession football but they are a top team.
The idea that we can only be a top team by possession football is not based on reality but the preference of some fans.
 
Fan from Uruguay here. I wanted to get my opinion on Ugarte.

Ugarte is a quality player without a doubt, very good defensively and while hes not a creative specialist, hes more than decent on ball. He even played more avanced positions early in his carreer, hes not a límited player at all.

Also hes a winner, determined and very smart player. I think United has been missing a player like him for a long time and hes going to improve the team.

For that price tag hes for sure a solid bet.

PSG is a mess and Luis Enrique is a fundamentalist coach who only looks at possesion based offense, it wasnt a good place for him. Hes a great fit in Ten Hag high pressing, more direct style, just like Bielsa in our national team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: roonster09
Fan from Uruguay here. I wanted to get my opinion on Ugarte.

Ugarte is a quality player without a doubt, very good defensively and while hes not a creative specialist, hes more than decent on ball. He even played more avanced positions early in his carreer, hes not a límited player at all.

Also hes a winner, determined and very smart player. I think United has been missing a player like him for a long time and hes going to improve the team.

For that price tag hes for sure a solid bet.

PSG is a mess and Luis Enrique is a fundamentalist coach who only looks at possesion based offense, it wasnt a good place for him. Hes a great fit in Ten Hag high pressing, more direct style, just like Bielsa in our national team.

That’s what we want to hear !

Hopefully we get this one over the line this week.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.