Manuel Ugarte | Romano - he’s signed | Awaiting Club announcement

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm not sure he's the right fit for our midfield. Seems to be great at interceptions and breaking up play, but lacks the ability to dictate the tempo and progress the ball forward like Rodri or Rice.
 
I'm not sure he's the right fit for our midfield. Seems to be great at interceptions and breaking up play, but lacks the ability to dictate the tempo and progress the ball forward like Rodri or Rice.
Rice doesn't dictate tempo. Usually Jorginho or Odegaard. Rodri does. Mainoo does too. We need bite in the middle.
 
I like Ugarte and he's probably the player we need, however anything above the 45m euros mark would be silly. He failed in France so his price must go down. Zubimendi is on 60m euros and he's a better player
 
As much as I want him no way is he worth over 50m. If they won't accept that then walk the feck away.
 
Any danger of buying any English players this summer? Before we know it the club will just be a collection of foreign mercenaries

Good idea! British players are known to be such good value for money.... 70m for the Everton defender who would cost 40m if he had any other nationality seems like a great deal!
 
INEOS targetted him because they could see an opportunity to get him for less than his market value - I'm sure they knew PSG wanted to cash in on him to fund other transfers.

I have faith in them not to overpay. I'm sure sending in a cheeky bid on Neves ourselves might focus PSGs minds.
 
We should point to the Di Maria fee and offer them something like €45m+€5m. If they say no then tell them to get fecked
 
Rice doesn't dictate tempo. Usually Jorginho or Odegaard. Rodri does. Mainoo does too. We need bite in the middle.

But Rice does progress the ball forward. My point is that Ugarte does neither of those things. He would work well in our press but I don't think he'd be effective against teams with a low block that give us a lot of the ball.
 
We should point to the Di Maria fee and offer them something like €45m+€5m. If they say no then tell them to get fecked
Especially because they’re leveraging this sale for the proceeds of whatever deal they’re cooking up for Neves.

If you’re flogging a player after a year because you want the next best thing, you can’t request a profit :lol:
 
I really want him here but that price is absurd. PSG are living in dreamland if they think they are making a profit on this. €50-€55M is reasonable.
 
70 million euros for a player they bought for 60 million a year ago and want to sell to fund Joao Neves. Pass, find a cheaper option for sure

Would take him for £42 million euros (£35 million) else we should just use the money for Neves ourselves.
 
Mainoo certainly doesn't dictate the tempo. Not yet anyway. Obviously the hope is that he develops into doing that over the next few years, but for now he doesn't.

Yeah I think that some confuse being really good at link up play and slick on the ball with being able to control the pace of the game.

We desperately need a Michael Carrick.
 
Yeah I think that some confuse being really good at link up play and slick on the ball with being able to control the pace of the game.

We desperately need a Michael Carrick.
Mainoo is capable of dictating play and growing into that player. His passing isn't expansive, but with the passing that he can do and he does have the natural ability to know how to slow things down, calm the game down, or speed it up.

Our main expansive passing from deep would be handled Martinez, Shaw, Dalot and Yoro/whoever the RCB is.
 
70 million euros for a player they bought for 60 million a year ago and want to sell to fund Joao Neves. Pass, find a cheaper option for sure

Would take him for £42 million euros (£35 million) else we should just use the money for Neves ourselves.
Hopefully we aren’t stupid enough to do it
 
70m! They want us to sponsor their transfers. Walk away.
They bought him for €60m, for a player they hasn't lived upto their expectations and actively want to ship, they can't expect to make a profit on him.
 
But Rice does progress the ball forward. My point is that Ugarte does neither of those things. He would work well in our press but I don't think he'd be effective against teams with a low block that give us a lot of the ball.
But he doesn't need to be against teams in a low block? The point of him is he can cover space and win the ball back quickly, higher up the pitch.
 
It’s clear they need to sell him to sign Neves and we’ve got them by the short and curlies because of it.


Expect another team to suddenly show interest in the next few days…
 
This was never going to be an easy deal to do. PSG are a club that likes to show everyone the size of their bollocks.

Will be done for around 55m but that's still overpaying really.
 
I hope we are able to secure some kind of loan with an obligation to buy based on meeting certain conditions. Far from sold on him and the price PSG are asking is ridiculous. I won't go higher than €5m loan fee and a €30m - €35m obligation. We gave them di Maria for a €15m+ discount then what we bought him for a year before. It's their time to be reciprocate the favor for a player they want to get rid of this time.
 
It is strange how Erik did U turn regarding no6 position. From playmaker like De Jong being priority, he decided to go for destroyers Casemiro and now Ugarte.
That's not how I interpreted it. He wanted both a destroyer plus FDJ. Whether we were going to get them in the same window was probably unlikely due to the fees and the lack of scouting/alternatives. I think Mainoo's rise has since compensated for not having FDJ or similar in midfield - as that would have been the position/characteristics required from FDJ. Now we still need a DM as Casemiro's seemingly on his last legs.
 
Ander did that. What did you think of him when he was here?
I loved him, so maybe I'm biased :lol:. I think Ugarte is more combative and better defensively than Ander. Ander had a better passing range/goal threat. I'd take an Ander clone in a heartbeat!
 
Well it depends, there isn't a rule that all mid fields should have the make-up you're suggesting. No one in the world has a defender as elite in passing between the lines and progressing the ball as Martinez, to the point where Pep singled him and that quality out as the main reason behind the FA Cup final loss, especially tactical loss.Therefore, in our case, that balance is there and being provided by the CB.

I'm also surprised about the notion that Mainoo is not a great passer. His natural technique and the way he zips the ball right to the players strong foot suggests with experience he has the potential to be an elite incisive passer. Just because he is also great at running and progressing with the ball does not mean we should discount his passing. This isn't aimed at you btw, I have just seen a general false narrative that came out of nowhere about Mainoo being limited in that area.
Not all midfielders need to be like that no, but I think this particular team needs that in that position. It's one of the things Casemiro still does very well, so are we really progressing if we exchange him for someone who does all the things well that he doesn't, but at the cost of losing the things he's good at? Martinez is very good at it yes, but can we rely on only one player for that?

I didn't say Mainoo isn't a great passer, he is. With him and ball progression (and this goes for carries as well), it's not a question of quality, but of volume: Simply put, he doesn't do very much of it, not so far at least. So unless that changes markedly, he is unlikely to be someone we can rely on to take care of a large part of that particular business.
 
Not sure why we wouldn’t just buy Neves if the price is 70 millio.

Or got and see how much Porto want for Varela.
 
Mainoo is capable of dictating play and growing into that player. His passing isn't expansive, but with the passing that he can do and he does have the natural ability to know how to slow things down, calm the game down, or speed it up.

Our main expansive passing from deep would be handled Martinez, Shaw, Dalot and Yoro/whoever the RCB is.

It's not really about technical ability, that is required but you need to have a brilliant picture of the game, always have your next pass planned when recieving the ball and be great at finding space in a midfield.

Mainoo is brilliant but he isn't that type of midfielder. Could he become it? Maybe. It might not even be the best thing for him. I think you put him next to that player and then have him float around using his ability to link play further forward and drive with the ball.
 
It's interesting, for sure. We are a team who lacks both physicality & the ability to hold on to the ball well, when under pressure. Ideally, it seems all the available "6's" in the market come across as one or the other (think Ugarte versus someone like Zubimendi). Mainoo himself, doesn't seem to be able to cover the ground as quickly on transition.

I won't claim to be too clued up on much outside of United, so I am wondering if there are a few players at the right level who could provide both attributes in that 6 position? Alternatively, Mainoo would need to develop his game - he's already fairly brilliant at holding the ball under pressure/short passing game/link up play etc. but he'd need develop his longer game if we were to sign more of a destroyer type like Ugarte.
 
Don't we all! I think he carries the ball to progress it (his drop of the shoulder or rolling players) and plays quick passes between the lines. He's not a defense splitter, but the same outcome is achieved, in my eyes anyway. If we can find said unicorn, we should go all out!

Yes, but again, volume. He simply doesn't do very much of either progressive passing or progressive carries. We tend to notice it when he does, because he has the ability to do it really well. He can influence games with key contributions because of that quality, but overall, the volume of his involvement is really limited. That shows up clearly both to the eye, and statistically. Not many passes, not many carries, not many touches for that matter.

It's a fascinating trait of his profile as a player. Is that because he's young and still learning and it will come, or is there some essential tradeoff there between quality and volume? Is he able to make those quality involvements because he's looking to always be in the smart places to set him up for those, rather than the places where he'd be most in the opposition's way or the easiest option for his teammates? I really can't tell. But in any case, he's not presently someone who actually does a big percentage of the ball progression work on this team.

It was really interesting to see him on England, which after all plays pretty much the exact opposite style to United - priority always on safe ball retention, with attacks tending to be measured and based on possession around the oppo box. He looked great in that setup - that's where he can really do some damage, with his smarts and his amazing technical ability. Dare I say it - he'd be really well suited for a team like City. :D
 
Last edited:
My only hope for PSG to come in for Rashford has gone sadly given their need to sell to bring in Neves.
 
Is he any good? If we get him next that will be 3 players in I've never seen kick a ball (not counting the Euros for Zirkzee).
 
I have the same worry. Since Mainoo is more of a ball carrier, and Bruno is the creator, we need our #6 to help out with the progressive passing and help switch play and stuff. But we also need our #6 to be a physical presence(to offset Martinez's weaknesses), and cover for Mainoo and Bruno's lack of physicality. Its a difficult piece of puzzle.

---Ugarte--Mainoo
--------Bruno

Is not a bad midfield, but lacks passing incisiveness in the middle of the park. A prime Carrick would have been a great partner for Mainoo.

If we get Ugarte, we also need to find a Eriksen replacement(preferably with a similar skillset), otherwise we will lack balance in midfield. We need to find a playmaker #8, a Kroos/Modric/Scholes type. If we find that player, eventually that player will replace Bruno, and this will be a solid midfield :

----------Ugarte
Mainoo---Creative #8
I don't think we can find a player to balance this.
 
Yes, but again, volume. He simply doesn't do very much of either progressive passing or progressive carries. We tend to notice it when he does, because he has the ability to do it really well. He can influence games with key contributions because of that quality, but overall, the volume of his involvement is really limited. That shows up clearly both to the eye, and statistically. Not many passes, not many carries, not many touches for that matter.

It's a really fascinating trait of his profile as a player. Is that because he's young and still learning and it will come, or is there some essential tradeoff there between quality and volume? Is he able to make those quality involvements because he's looking to always be in the smart places to set him up for those, rather than the places where he'd be most in the opposition's way or the easiest option for him teammates? I really can't tell. But in any case, he's not presently someone who actually does a big percentage of the ball progression work on this team.
May be an incorrect assessment by me, but I naively think if we can dominate the ball higher and have higher turnovers (as in higher up the pitch), those involvements would naturally go up, by virtue of having more possession. I think the most important thing is to stop us being easily countered on and winning the ball back quickly and Ugarte can address that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.