RedRocket08
Full Member
Swiss Rumble has already explained that we don’t effectively have many limits on PSR anymore. They calculated we can easily spend 250m this summer without having any concerns.
So the only limits financially are actual cash flow, and our internal limits on sustainable spending. I don’t believe any player has to leave for us to be able to sign anyone unless we literally have no cash in the bank and no access to credit facilities.
I believe we will be working hard to balance the books over the course of the summer and we will see plenty of outgoings to accomplish that, but I don’t believe for a second that we aren’t able to buy anyone without selling. The hard data just doesn’t support it.
We have cleverly repositioned the perception of the club as being unable to spend, thus proving a powerful negotiating tool, but the idea that we HAVE to sell to buy, from a purely financial perspective, has been debunked by those willing to look hard enough into the facts.
PSR was a concern up to June 30th, but with 21/22’s exceptional losses now dropping out of the three year cycle, we no longer have any PSR concerns. In fact, it’s been explained that will the pure profit sales of academy players this summer, and the wage reductions from losing Martial, Varane, and not playing in the CL, we could effectively afford to sign 4 players for 100m each on 300k p/wk contracts and still not breach PSR this season. We’ll never come close to that outlay, but it’s perfectly within the clubs reach to spend 200-250m this summer without selling anyone.
Great post, I agree and I think that we as a club are trying to get the best players possible this summer while also working on the sustainability of our business.
Part of that is offloading some of those expensive contracts, coupled with this new (and better imo) approach of signing good young players (on reasonable wages) that we can develop further via instalment-contracts. I doubt we will be spending 250M of actual money, but we may get players worth around that and pay it over a number of years - a bit like Chelsea but without the ridiculous transfer fees, and with a good footballing structure making the calls. We’re spending wisely on transfers even though we have the funds to spend callously like we’ve done in the past, so that we can sort out our debt / stadium plans - Seems smart/obvious but it’s taken a change in ownership to get there.
We’ll push hard to sell one of Scott/Case, but if we aren’t able to sell, we’ll still go out and get Ugarte closer to the deadline - the angle of ‘we need funds to buy Ugarte, but we are restricted by PSR, hence why we’re demanding this much for Case/Scott’ will help United get the best value they can for those two midfielders.