Withnail
Full Member
Transfer sagas in Red Cafe: 2010-2024. INEOS aren’t giving us muppets the chance to develop any thread into a saga.
End of an era
Transfer sagas in Red Cafe: 2010-2024. INEOS aren’t giving us muppets the chance to develop any thread into a saga.
I don't want us to sign Rabiot but that's just a ridiculous statementUgarte would be an addition to the midfield. Rabiot wouldn't give us anything we're not already getting from McTominay.
Admins this deserves 4 likes at least…Ugarte be kidding me.
Ugarte would be an addition to the midfield. Rabiot wouldn't give us anything we're not already getting from McTominay.
Why one or the other, just get both. They'd compliment each other well.I would get Zubimendi instead.
Ugarte be kidding me.
Ugarte be kidding me.
It deserves banning. Stealing the comedy Dr’s joke.Admins this deserves 4 likes at least…
I don't really love the look of him or think he's what we need but will look forward to hopefully being proven wrong.
I assume it's people distinguishing this window under the new guard, appointed by the new co-owners, to how we've been for so long under the old ones appointed by Glazers.At what point we stop calling them INEOS and start saying Utd? Cause they’re all Utd employees now.
Laughter is the best medicine I'm told.It deserves banning. Stealing the comedy Dr’s joke.
This one was betterCredit card? Ugarte!
Admins this deserves 4 likes at least…
Rabiot gives us more tactical flexibility. Rabiot is a positionally aware midfielder and knows the position well.
McTominay whilst useful as an impact sub as an attacking mid is pretty atrocious at playing deeper in midfield. Positionally he looks lost.
Not quite good enough on the ball for tiki taka.Why would PSG want rid?
I'm not a fan of Rabiot but he's simply a much smarter and technically astute player that Scotty is. He's also often used as a Matuidi-like workhorse by Deschamps (so, he has plenty of workrate if he's motivated) and is a more consistent goalscorer than McTominay (to be fair, he only became a proper goalscoring threat for us last season, before that he only showed this ability sporadically).Ugarte would be an addition to the midfield. Rabiot wouldn't give us anything we're not already getting from McTominay.
There must be two players named "Casemiro" then.
Looks like I missed it like John TerryIt deserves banning. Stealing the comedy Dr’s joke.
I don't disagree that his positioning is one of his shortcomings. I just don't buy that losing McTominay in favor of Rabiot would be a game changer for our midfield. If anything, we should be retaining both, especially given that Rabiot would be coming on a free.
I'm not a fan of Rabiot but he's simply a much smarter and technically astute player that Scotty is. He's also often used as a Matuidi-like workhorse by Deschamps (so, he has plenty of workrate if he's motivated) and is a more consistent goalscorer than McTominay (to be fair, he only became a proper goalscoring threat for us last season, before that he only showed this ability sporadically).
I don't appreciate his style very much and I don't think that he'd be a great addition to the squad (first and foremost as a character, we've got enough of questionable ones as it is), but to say that he wouldn't bring anything that we're not already getting from McTominay is to significantly underestimate Rabiot's ability.
Vitinha, Zaïre Emery and Fabian Ruiz are a better fit for Enrique. He could probably have stayed as a squad player it he wanted.Why would PSG want rid?
Ruiz & Vitinha are simply better at what they do and Zaïre-Emery is their golden boy. Plus, Ugarte is not exactly the type that they envision as their main defensive midfielder going forward.Why would PSG want rid?
It deserves banning. Stealing the comedy Dr’s joke.
I used to think the fan comments on Football Manager were unrealistic.
Apart from abilityUgarte would be an addition to the midfield. Rabiot wouldn't give us anything we're not already getting from McTominay.
Agreed! If we are to move on 2 midfielders, it should be Casemiro and Eriksen. We are one of the most underwhelming midfields in the league in terms of physicality. Rabiot and Ugarte would be good additions in that sense. But we should definitely keep McTominay as he provides that presence in both boxes you often need towards the end of games.I don't disagree that his positioning is one of his shortcomings. I just don't buy that losing McTominay in favor of Rabiot would be a game changer for our midfield. If anything, we should be retaining both, especially given that Rabiot would be coming on a free.
If you’d have sat here and said about each of our signings in the last 10 years that they’d turn out fecking shite you’d have an unreal strike rate.No, he’s terrible. The lads have been on the drink though so we’re signing him for a laugh.