Different approaches for different games. Against low block teams, this unit would keep the ball better, have better off the ball movement, and more creativity. Pace doesn’t help much when there’s no space behind, which is 70% of our games. You also of course have the option of Rashford and Garnacho against tired legs. Plus, Amad is pretty rapid and has the ability to beat a man with relative ease, which disrupts shape.
Against other high pressing teams, like City or Spurs, I’d play Garnacho and/or Rashford (not both) for those runs in behind. You’ve also got Hojlund for those runs into the channels and in behind. Different horses for different courses.
As a rule of thumb, I’d always go for my most technical players with the best work rate. All three of Mount, Bruno and Amad work very hard off the ball. Given current form, I think Mount offers much more than Rashford does, who needs a spell fighting for his place in the team to get the best out of him. Right now he’s a guaranteed pick and that just isn’t good for his mentality.
Mount has been used as an 8 here, then as a rotating false 9. He’s far too good of a player to continue to be misused. On the left he will provide us with quality deliveries into the box, superb work rate, intelligent pressing, the ability to tuck into midfield and help out, and he has very good off the ball movement. He’s very quick over the first five yards too. He’s so much better than he’s been able to show for us so far, and I’d love to see him given a run at LW and hopefully become part of a much more cohesive unit. Ball retention is a very important part of controlling games and defending, and he gives us 100% more in that regard than Rashford does. Rashford is at his best when he’s playing on the shoulder of the last man and making runs for a ball over the top. At that he is world class, but it requires space behind for it to work. At nearly everything else, he is pretty average.