Bondi77
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2019
- Messages
- 8,469
Only if we are getting rid of Casemiro.Great but we still need one more cm and a LB.
Only if we are getting rid of Casemiro.Great but we still need one more cm and a LB.
I hate to spill cold water on this but he is a midfielder with few goal involvements to his name. Four assists and no goals in 109 appearances over three years in Portugal and France. And we will in return lose McTominay's goals and assists.
My concerns would go if we were also seeking a creative midfielder. But we are not. Where are the goals coming from?
We managed just 57 goals last season.
I hope he makes the team for Sunday, as he would be useful vs liverpool. Glad we got this over the line. Lets hope he adapts quickly and makes us harder to play through.
That wouldn't be 'rubbish'. It's a valid issue.Knowing Ten Hag we won't see him in the team for 6 weeks. Usual rubbish he not ready needs few more training sessions. Rubbish
Get him in Sunday and get going.
Not my video he’s on about.
This is mine.
Yeah that's pretty much what I think will happen. It's also why I'm trying not to look too much into our results and performances until late September/early October.That wouldn't be 'rubbish'. It's a valid issue.
He's had a stop-start summer. Playing for Uruguay in the Copa Amercia, then being out of the picture at PSG so lacking some match sharpness at this stage.
No way should we throw him straight in as a starter in a huge game v Liverpool. Hopefully though he'll be available to come off the bench for half an hour or so. Then, after that, Uruguay have three matches during the international break, two of which are World Cup qualifiers and I'm sure he'll be involved in those, so he'll only arrive back from South America a few days before the league game after the break and so should probably only be a sub again.
Due to his late arrival, and then the international break, I'd say his first start should probably be the Crystal Palace match.
Any chance to plug your vid
These sort of whoppers shouldn’t get away with this sort of tedious shite.
We'll outscore United's attacking playersYou provide the assists and I’ll score
It could potentially be Mount when we've got our strikers back fit.With the way Mainoo and Casemiro run out of steam by the 60th minute, we're looking for two players who can come in to replace them at this point without weakening the team or hampering our creativity in middle of the pitch.
Casemiro/Ugarte seems like a good swap, either way around.
The massive question mark for me is who do we rotate in for Mainoo, assuming Mainoo is the starter.
Don’t know much about Ugarte
Don’t know much the point of Anthony
Don’t know much about the Dutch I took
And I don’t really get Ten Hag’s playbook
But I do know that I feel blue
And I know that if you feel blue too
We should probably go watch City
Yea, no, as you saw it’s just an early suggestion for the Ugarte song thread.Is this some sort of a weird rant? I don't really have time to follow PSG games to have an in-depth analysis of what Ugarte is capable of. It's better to admit that than to feign knowledge that doesn't exist. Besides, my point is Casemiro is done and we can't trust him to play at a decent level week in and week out.
EDIT: Sorry, missed the context!
And thank you too.that's brilliant
I think Ugarte should start in big games and Casemiro should be rotation for him. I dont think we need Casemiro to come on for Ugarte on 60th minute or something, not most of the timeCould be the type of signing that helps keep him in a job in the long run, tbh. His subs continue to be an issue, but part of that is the massive dips that we have throughout the squad where our bench options just aren't good enough. But, suddenly, we have the option to rotate between Casemiro and Ugarte. That should help us to stop being overrun late within games, or should help us to protect any leads that we have.
Defence looks like it's steadily improving with the signings we've made. I'm less convinced by the forward line. I would love a really spicy forward.
Yeah, that's true.Yeah that's pretty much what I think will happen. It's also why I'm trying not to look too much into our results and performances until late September/early October.
Everyone should technically be up and running by then, so if there isn't a wholesale improvement then I'll start to worry for the season.
This is a fair point, you might get attacked for it but it’s a legitimate concern. Many even want him at the expense of Casemiro, who also happens to be an important source of goals and creativity in this team.I hate to spill cold water on this but he is a midfielder with few goal involvements to his name. Four assists and no goals in 109 appearances over three years in Portugal and France. And we will in return lose McTominay's goals and assists.
My concerns would go if we were also seeking a creative midfielder. But we are not. Where are the goals coming from?
We managed just 57 goals last season.
Spot on, it became obvious that signing Ugarte was dependant on selling Sancho or McTominay.Firstly, no we didn’t. They wanted €70m at the start of the summer and have agreed €50m + €10m.
Secondly, it looks like this has only been possible because we’ve managed to move McTominay on. We’ve been trying to sell McTominay and Sancho all summer and the likelihood is that we couldn’t do this deal until we had or we’d face some sort of fine down the line.
We need a ball playing midfielder tooWill Ugarte be the missing piece of the puzzle that finally gets the ETH project clicking? if he isn't then I am not sure what the solution could be!
The best teams don’t play with specialist ball winners now. Not the ones who dominate possession - Arsenal, City, Real etc. They don’t need them as their tactical set up and quality of defenders negates the need for one.Eh? Ugarte is not the player we need if we built the team properly, but we need a ball winner so we need ugarte?
How's that work?
Agree with this. It’s also a point that out midfield has worked very well so far until around the 60th minute, controlling both Fulham and Brighton very well and providing a base for lots of chances vs Fulham and quite a few smaller opportunities against Brighton. The weaknesses were only showing when Case/Mainoo ran out of steam and Mount’s pressing was replaced by Zirkzee’s, who just isn’t so synchronised with the collective press yet.That wouldn't be 'rubbish'. It's a valid issue.
He's had a stop-start summer. Playing for Uruguay in the Copa Amercia, then being out of the picture at PSG so lacking match fitness and sharpness at this stage.
I don't think we should throw him straight in as a starter in a huge game v Liverpool. Hopefully though he'll be available to come off the bench for half an hour or so. Then, after that, Uruguay have three matches during the international break, two of which are World Cup qualifiers and I'm sure he'll be involved in those, so he'll only arrive back from South America a few days before the league game after the break and so should probably only be a sub again.
Due to his late arrival, and then the international break, I'd say his first start should probably be the Crystal Palace match. We may well rush him straight into the team for either of the other two games, but I doubt he'd be at his freshest or sharpest.
70M for Ugarte? So basically they would go ahead and use that 70M to buy Neves instead? No thanks.
70m! They want us to sponsor their transfers. Walk away.
I don't think the way we played last season is sustainable, regardless of personnel. Sure Ugarte can help break up some of the counter-attacks but he won't be able to stop us from conceding 20+ shots on goal on his own.
I did not - I avoided England games mostly as they were boring. But agree that we need a Rodri clone. I would be fine with Ugarte but definitely not at the 70m price range we're being quoted. I'd rather we take a punt on someone Seiwald at a much more reasonable price.
50M EUR tops. They're not getting anything close to 70.
Just having that destroyer profile in the squad is useful both in the short / long term even if we eventually get someone who can sit and dictate the game. So I'm fine with us hobbling along for another season with Ugarte - Mainoo at CM. Or even Ugarte - Mount. (I'm secretly still of the opinion that Mount is going to do fine in the Mainoo role but don't want to say it out too loud because all of the Caf decided to make him the poster boy for the previous regime's failures.)
If the ball progression can come from other players I don't know if such a player is strictly needed positional play or not. City got it done with Fernandinho, Liverpool with Fabinho etc. so I think we'll wait and see the results of the defence being re-worked, players being fit, Mainoo evolving even more and then find that playmaker if we really need one.
With the €70m PSG want, I can see why Zubimendi and Rabiot are being locked at, I think if they insist on that 70m well look elsewhere.
70 millions euros, feck off if that's true. Hopefully we can negotiate a better price.
€70m is laughable considering they want to get rid of him. A straight swap for Sancho would be a fair deal.
It will be stupid if the club accepts PSG unreasonable demand of €70m for Ugarte, anything above 50m in total is too much and not worth it
Ugarte €50m right at the bottom of that list of fees.Just for context, if we take €60m as the proposed fee for Ugarte, this is the list of midfielders who cost +/- €10m of that.
Rodri - €70m
Szoboszlai - €70m
Tonali - €64m
Lavia - €62.10m
Matheus Nunes - €62m
Ndombele - €62m
Pjanic - €60m
Keita - €60m
Joao Neves - €59.92
Onana - €59.35
Fred - €59m
Jorginho - €57m
Ruben Neves - €55m
Palhinha - €51m
Douglas Luiz - €51.5m
Partey - €50m
Seeing all the above quotes it doesn’t matter if it was a month ago or not it was their initial demand. You can see people’s views at that price.The tweet you quoted is more than a month back. Any demands of 70M euros was posturing, nobody was gonna pay that since they got him for 60M euros themselves and now he was unwanted.
Latest reports have all claimed PSG basically want to recoup the 60M they paid for him.
I dont think its the worst compromise, but a how is it a good deal when the overall package is exactly what PSG wanted?
What do you call Rice?The best teams don’t play with specialist ball winners now. Not the ones who dominate possession - Arsenal, City, Real etc. They don’t need them as their tactical set up and quality of defenders negates the need for one.
Our tactical set up is shite and we have inadequate defenders so we actually need a specialist ball winner.
Depends which language I'm speaking.What do you call Rice?
You mean Dan AshworthWilcox delivering the goods. Excellent. Expensive, but I think it's on the limit of fees we're now willing to pay. For a young player with plenty of potential, I think it's a very good deal.
Glad we haven't let this go to deadline day. Still a few days in the window to concentrate on clearing the deadwood and hopefully bring another in.
You mean Joan the dishwasher .You mean Dan Ashworth
Ugarte €50m right at the bottom of that list of fees.
Supplies! Supplies!Depends which language I'm speaking.
Will Ugarte be the missing piece of the puzzle that finally gets the ETH project clicking? if he isn't then I am not sure what the solution could be!
Agreed, I had reservation of the club paying the full €60M, but as you said, it ended up thereabouts of what many thought should be given the context of the player.In the context of that list, €50m+€10m seems fair.
Not my video he’s on about.
This is mine.
Not my video he’s on about.
This is mine.
Only if we are getting rid of Casemiro.