Rolaholic
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2016
- Messages
- 12,941
Bet after all the moaning in here, we don’t end up paying this €60m being touted today and it’s actually closer to what we are demanding.
I haven't seen anyone say that who is as reliable as the Athletic podcast guys. If Ornstein says we don't need to sell to buy then I'll take it.It’s being well advocated here that we don’t need to sell to buy. We are still within the PSR limits.
It's what they said. Makes sense if they want to keep the wage bill down too. We have too many players on the payroll, including ones who never actually play like Shaw.Yeah that’s obvious bollocks considering it’s an initial loan probably.
Or he could just be a load of English hype and also have a bang average season this year.
You still seem to be missing the point by an impressively large distance.
So what if some people thought Sancho was worth it at the time? Some didn’t. Just like some people think Ugarte is worth it and some don’t. There is no substantive difference between the two except for your entirely arbitrary opinion that one was worth it even though he ended up a flop, and one isn’t worth it even though we haven’t actually signed him yet, don’t know what the deal will be if we do, or how he will fit and and perform over time.
People forget the importance of a dirty bastard in our midfield along with footballing abilities and let me remind you that we are signing an absolute shithouse. Time to repost that recent clip against Argentina where he calls De Paul a Messi cocksucker.
Didn't the Athletic say we had £50million to spend this summer bar player sales?I haven't seen anyone say that who is as reliable as the Athletic podcast guys. If Ornstein says we don't need to sell to buy then I'll take it.
It's what they said. Makes sense if they want to keep the wage bill down too. We have too many players on the payroll, including ones who never actually play like Shaw.
So did Orstein actually say we need to sell to buy?I haven't seen anyone say that who is as reliable as the Athletic podcast guys. If Ornstein says we don't need to sell to buy then I'll take it.
It's what they said. Makes sense if they want to keep the wage bill down too. We have too many players on the payroll, including ones who never actually play like Shaw.
Obviously not no.So did Orstein actually say we need to sell to buy?
That's some serious edging.The exciting thing is that we will only be even closer tomorrow. No backwards steps now.
You can find floor-raisers for 25m and reasonable wages. I love those types of signings, especially early on in a team's project. Paying 51m for a player who's arguably worth closer to 25m than 51m is not a "very good" signing. Even if he raises the floor, the ceiling is limited.
With every post you make you keep reducing his market value. What’s your reasoning or calculation for coming up with these imaginary “market value” numbers?You can find floor-raisers for 25m and reasonable wages. I love those types of signings, especially early on in a team's project. Paying 51m for a player who's arguably worth closer to 25m than 51m is not a "very good" signing. Even if he raises the floor, the ceiling is limited.
Manuel Ugarte ever closer to Manchester United
The outcome is near but at this time there is still no total agreement between PSG and Manchester United
Paris Saint-Germain wants 60M € .
A loan with purchase option is also being studied
Fabrizio Romano is quite good - and he's been fairly quiet tooThe only one I trust for fees is Ornstein and he has been quiet on this, no? I will wait and see.
I dont really believe this.
Quite funny if true though.
I dont really believe this.
Quite funny if true though.
Castles does have links to Mendes. Who happens to be involved in this deal I believe...Sounds like bollocks.
No single player will transform Manchester United. Again, this is not the super man films. Ugarte is a quality player with specific skills which will be added to the central midfield. United need to bring more quality in, it is constant work. It seems a lot of people can't process this simple logic.Ugarte will probably improve us. But from everything I've seen so far, he's a floor-raiser with a limited ceiling. This has been my point ever since we've been linked with him. He's far too expensive for what he provides, both short-term and especially long-term. Wages will be high too.
Some are clearly trolls and others act as if they are footing the bill for the transfers and their wages. FM has truly ruined reality for some people.I'm not really seeing what some are getting making the same relentlessly negative posts over and over again. Surely it's not making them feel any better?
So did Orstein actually say we need to sell to buy?
Obviously not no.
What frustration?Whats wrong with you two? That’s quite clearly not the point I was making
I’m saying Athletic are the most reliable ones I’ve seen comment on it either way
Stop dishing out your frustration. I was just sharing what I heard
I think you’re the one frustrated mate. I just asked a question.Whats wrong with you two? That’s quite clearly not the point I was making
I’m saying Athletic are the most reliable ones I’ve seen comment on it either way
Stop dishing out your frustration. I was just sharing what I heard
Sounds a bit believable, actually. Would explain why PSG have been so bullish. Castles is normally a spoofer but on Mendes clients he does have a scoop some times.Sounds like bollocks.
Yeaaah I call bullshit on that.(Can't quoute media...)
Punching above their weight there the same way they were when they tried it with Real