dinostar77
Full Member
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2014
- Messages
- 8,825
It's a daft take, because it assumes Casemiro can maintain this level the entire season.I don't mind Julien Laurens but that's just a stupid take
It's a daft take, because it assumes Casemiro can maintain this level the entire season.I don't mind Julien Laurens but that's just a stupid take
Banking on Casemiro and relying on him over a long hard season would be mind boggling naive and dumb.
You are correct everyone is intitled to their opinion and no ones opinion is any more correct than anyone else'sBut then we can close this whole forum down for good, no? Because everyone is an armchair expert on here technically. The only difference in my opinions is that they're often not popular with other armchair experts.
What if we sign a player that the masses on here will not be happy with, like Sander Berge? Will then the scouts and directors be stupid?
What I do understand is that you will read anything in a way that enables you to have a pop at the club. It's beyond hilarious at this point and just tedious.
It's not hard to understand though, he doesn't fit into Enrique's possession based football approach. That doesn't mean he's a poor player. Theirry Henry didn't fit in at Juventus and they sold him to arsenal. Doesn't make Henry a poor player.I do think fans need to take into account the reasons why Enrique is so eager to move on from Ugarte.
I also think United were hugely unfortunate that Benfica were willing to move on from Neves this summer.
You'll have to admit it's really weak PRopaganda though.Briefing a couple of journos that Casemiros good form makes Ugarte less of an essential purchase is exactly what a serious club would do when working to have PSG lower their asking price.
You'll have to admit it's really weak PRopaganda though.
See, this is the issue I have with ETH set up.It's not hard to understand though, he doesn't fit into Enrique's possession based football approach. That doesn't mean he's a poor player. Theirry Henry didn't fit in at Juventus and they sold him to arsenal. Doesn't make Henry a poor player.
Neves would have been ideal, however he's gone to the one club who are a basket case and move on players for any number of reasons. There's every chance we could sign him in the next few years.
Yeah, in isolation it would seem that way. I get that.That post read to me as being incredulous of the opinion of the journalist i.e. the club would have to be stupid to think that way.
Regardless of the history of the poster a warning seems quite harsh in this instance.
No offense but that's just what you as a fan want . May be ETH and our hierarchy has a different plan ?See, this is the issue I have with ETH set up.
I would like us to actually control the games.
Nah, he's daft as feck. He's good fun as a pundit, but he comes out with some ridiculous things.I don't mind Julien Laurens but that's just a stupid take
The hold up being we don't want to pay whatever inflated price the seller demands of us as we always have in the past. Think it's clear the new management are trying to set a new precedence with us not simply caving everytime we want a player. We have a decades worth of having the reputation of willing to be fleeced that we're trying to undo.Wonder what the hold up is as our new management has shown itself to be quite capable of swiftly getting things wrapped up when it comes to it.
Briefing a couple of journos that Casemiros good form makes Ugarte less of an essential purchase is exactly what a serious club would do when working to have PSG lower their asking price.
Wonder what the hold up is as our new management has shown itself to be quite capable of swiftly getting things wrapped up when it comes to it.
Is there really any need to rush with it? Personally I think that if the answer was "yes" then we'd really be in trouble.Wonder what the hold up is as our new management has shown itself to be quite capable of swiftly getting things wrapped up when it comes to it.
We don't want to pay the €60m they're looking for. They want to get their money back when they're trying to offload him a year after buying him so we're playing a little bit of hardball.
If the hardball results is a deal that sees Utd pay a lower price then I can understand that, just hope it doesn't cost us any league points against Brighton or scousers in next two games.
Yeah absolutely agree but then it could also depend on outgoings. We don't have much actual cash, do we?
100%, we seen this before with Matic starting well but burning out due to age. I don’t think anyone at the club is seriously thinking this anyway I’d hopeThe problem is what if Casemiro’s form doesn’t last and he’s only capable of producing performances like this now and again? It’s a big risk making a decision like that based off a couple of performances at the start of the season. Who knows what he’ll be like when we start playing two games a week and the workload gets ramped up. I would hate for the window to shut and we realise Casemiro’s resurgence was only a little patch of form and now we have to rely on a second rate option like Berge or Amrabat because we tried to do things on the cheap.
Casemiro isn't all that when it comes to passing either, lest we forget his first 2 seasons. The system and teammates' movement are as important in making him look good. I think this post 2 years ago from a Madrid fan is really on point:
100%, we seen this before with Matic starting well but burning out due to age. I don’t think anyone at the club is seriously thinking this anyway I’d hope
Been thinking this myself. On current form would he even start?
Such a short sighted take when we also have to play 60+ matches this season...
We absolutely need someone besides soon to be 33 year old Casemiro in that role in the team. The whole point is to not have to run him into the ground while mitigating any massive drops in quality at that position when he's being rested/rotated.
That's the only way that we'll be able to consistently get the most out of this fitter, leaner version of Casemiro this season.
Been thinking this myself. On current form would he even start?
We should certainly be concerned that Casemiro has aged another year during the last page or so. At this rate he'll be done before the next game.Such a short sighted take when we also have to play 60+ matches this season...
We absolutely need someone besides soon to be 33 year old Casemiro in that role in the team. The whole point is to not have to run him into the ground while mitigating any massive drops in quality at that position when he's being rested/rotated.
That's the only way that we'll be able to consistently get the most out of this fitter, leaner version of Casemiro this season.
Been thinking this myself. On current form would he even start?
Casemiro doesn't really play as a no.6 anymore so Ugarte would be a different profile of player if we brought him in.People are just not reading that tweet properly. Laurens is not suggesting we rely solely on Casemiro, he suggesting that if he's number one then we may choose to spend less on a backup to him. We obviously are doing that with the interest in Berge.